新生儿重症监护室护士的道德基础、道德情感和道德困扰。

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Nursing Ethics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-23 DOI:10.1177/09697330241262468
Peter Barr
{"title":"新生儿重症监护室护士的道德基础、道德情感和道德困扰。","authors":"Peter Barr","doi":"10.1177/09697330241262468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Moral distress is common in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) nurses.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationships between NICU nurses' moral foundations, moral emotions, and moral distress.</p><p><strong>Research design and method: </strong>This is an observational cross-sectional self-report questionnaire study.</p><p><strong>Participants and research context: </strong>One hundred and forty-two (24%) of 585 Level 3-4 NICU nurses completed pen-and-paper self-report measures of moral foundations (harm, fairness, ingroup, authority, and purity) (Moral Foundations Questionnaire-20), proneness to self-conscious moral emotions (guilt and shame) (modified Personal Feelings Questionnaire-2), and moral distress (futile care, compromised care, and untruthful care) (modified Revised Moral Distress Scale).</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>Participation was voluntary and anonymous. The ethics committees of the participating hospitals approved the study protocol (HREC Reference: LNR/18/SCHN/316).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-parametric statistical analyses showed medium to large correlations between moral foundations and moral emotions. Moral foundations and moral emotions had trivial to small correlations with moral distress. Using a liberal <i>p-</i>value of <.10 for statistical significance because of the small sample size, harm (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.22) and fairness (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.16) predicted futile care, ingroup predicted compromised care (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.19) and untruthful care (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.15), and purity predicted untruthful care (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.15). Guilt-proneness predicted futile care (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.15). Shame-proneness did not predict moral distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The correlations between moral foundations and moral emotions were significant. Moral foundations and guilt-proneness predicted one or more dimensions of moral distress. The smaller than expected effect sizes may have been owing to how moral foundations, moral emotions, and moral distress were conceptualized and measured, or to moral disengagement, including NICU nurses' possible reluctance to countenance aversive but morally warranted feelings of guilt and especially shame. Understanding the nature of these relationships may complement the efforts of NICU administrators, educators, counsellors, and nurses themselves to mitigate moral distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"636-647"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral foundations, moral emotions, and moral distress in NICU nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Barr\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09697330241262468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Moral distress is common in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) nurses.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationships between NICU nurses' moral foundations, moral emotions, and moral distress.</p><p><strong>Research design and method: </strong>This is an observational cross-sectional self-report questionnaire study.</p><p><strong>Participants and research context: </strong>One hundred and forty-two (24%) of 585 Level 3-4 NICU nurses completed pen-and-paper self-report measures of moral foundations (harm, fairness, ingroup, authority, and purity) (Moral Foundations Questionnaire-20), proneness to self-conscious moral emotions (guilt and shame) (modified Personal Feelings Questionnaire-2), and moral distress (futile care, compromised care, and untruthful care) (modified Revised Moral Distress Scale).</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>Participation was voluntary and anonymous. The ethics committees of the participating hospitals approved the study protocol (HREC Reference: LNR/18/SCHN/316).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-parametric statistical analyses showed medium to large correlations between moral foundations and moral emotions. Moral foundations and moral emotions had trivial to small correlations with moral distress. Using a liberal <i>p-</i>value of <.10 for statistical significance because of the small sample size, harm (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.22) and fairness (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.16) predicted futile care, ingroup predicted compromised care (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.19) and untruthful care (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.15), and purity predicted untruthful care (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.15). Guilt-proneness predicted futile care (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.15). Shame-proneness did not predict moral distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The correlations between moral foundations and moral emotions were significant. Moral foundations and guilt-proneness predicted one or more dimensions of moral distress. The smaller than expected effect sizes may have been owing to how moral foundations, moral emotions, and moral distress were conceptualized and measured, or to moral disengagement, including NICU nurses' possible reluctance to countenance aversive but morally warranted feelings of guilt and especially shame. Understanding the nature of these relationships may complement the efforts of NICU administrators, educators, counsellors, and nurses themselves to mitigate moral distress.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"636-647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241262468\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241262468","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新生儿重症监护室(NICU)护士普遍存在道德困扰。目的:本研究旨在评估新生儿重症监护室护士的道德基础、道德情感和道德困扰之间的关系。研究设计与方法:这是一项观察性横断面自我报告问卷调查研究。参与者和研究背景:585 名 3-4 级 NICU 护士中的 142 人(24%)完成了纸笔自我报告测量,内容包括道德基础(伤害、公平、内群、权威和纯洁)(道德基础问卷-20)、自我意识道德情绪(内疚和羞耻)(修订的个人感受问卷-2)和道德困扰(徒劳护理、受损护理和不真实护理)(修订的道德困扰量表)。伦理考虑:参与自愿且匿名。参与医院的伦理委员会批准了研究方案(HREC 编号:LNR/18/SCHN/316)。研究结果非参数统计分析显示,道德基础与道德情感之间存在中到大的相关性。道德基础和道德情感与道德困扰的相关性很小。使用宽松的 p 值 rs = 0.22)和公平性(rs = 0.16)可预测徒劳的关怀,内群体可预测妥协的关怀(rs = 0.19)和不真实的关怀(rs = 0.15),纯洁性可预测不真实的关怀(rs = 0.15)。愧疚感预测无用关怀(rs = 0.15)。羞愧倾向并不预测道德困扰。结论道德基础与道德情感之间存在显著相关。道德基础和内疚感可预测一个或多个方面的道德困扰。影响大小小于预期的原因可能是道德基础、道德情感和道德困扰的概念化和测量方式,也可能是道德脱离,包括新生儿重症监护室护士可能不愿意面对厌恶但在道德上有正当理由的内疚感,尤其是羞耻感。了解这些关系的性质可以补充新生儿重症监护病房管理者、教育者、辅导员和护士自身为减轻道德困扰所做的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moral foundations, moral emotions, and moral distress in NICU nurses.

Background: Moral distress is common in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) nurses.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationships between NICU nurses' moral foundations, moral emotions, and moral distress.

Research design and method: This is an observational cross-sectional self-report questionnaire study.

Participants and research context: One hundred and forty-two (24%) of 585 Level 3-4 NICU nurses completed pen-and-paper self-report measures of moral foundations (harm, fairness, ingroup, authority, and purity) (Moral Foundations Questionnaire-20), proneness to self-conscious moral emotions (guilt and shame) (modified Personal Feelings Questionnaire-2), and moral distress (futile care, compromised care, and untruthful care) (modified Revised Moral Distress Scale).

Ethical considerations: Participation was voluntary and anonymous. The ethics committees of the participating hospitals approved the study protocol (HREC Reference: LNR/18/SCHN/316).

Results: Non-parametric statistical analyses showed medium to large correlations between moral foundations and moral emotions. Moral foundations and moral emotions had trivial to small correlations with moral distress. Using a liberal p-value of <.10 for statistical significance because of the small sample size, harm (rs = 0.22) and fairness (rs = 0.16) predicted futile care, ingroup predicted compromised care (rs = 0.19) and untruthful care (rs = 0.15), and purity predicted untruthful care (rs = 0.15). Guilt-proneness predicted futile care (rs = 0.15). Shame-proneness did not predict moral distress.

Conclusion: The correlations between moral foundations and moral emotions were significant. Moral foundations and guilt-proneness predicted one or more dimensions of moral distress. The smaller than expected effect sizes may have been owing to how moral foundations, moral emotions, and moral distress were conceptualized and measured, or to moral disengagement, including NICU nurses' possible reluctance to countenance aversive but morally warranted feelings of guilt and especially shame. Understanding the nature of these relationships may complement the efforts of NICU administrators, educators, counsellors, and nurses themselves to mitigate moral distress.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信