支气管扩张对非严重哮喘临床特征的影响。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Kyung-Il Han, Hyun Lee, Bo-Guen Kim, Yoomi Yeo, Tai Sun Park, Dong Won Park, Ji-Yong Moon, Sang-Heon Kim, Jang Won Sohn, Ho Joo Yoon, Tae Hyung Kim
{"title":"支气管扩张对非严重哮喘临床特征的影响。","authors":"Kyung-Il Han, Hyun Lee, Bo-Guen Kim, Yoomi Yeo, Tai Sun Park, Dong Won Park, Ji-Yong Moon, Sang-Heon Kim, Jang Won Sohn, Ho Joo Yoon, Tae Hyung Kim","doi":"10.4168/aair.2024.16.3.291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current literature primarily delves into the relationship between bronchiectasis and severe asthma, and only a few studies have evaluated the impact of bronchiectasis in patients with non-severe asthma. Therefore, this study investigated the clinical impact of bronchiectasis in patients with non-severe asthma. A prospective observational study of 140 non-severe asthmatic patients with (bronchiectasis group) and without bronchiectasis (control group) was conducted between September 2012 and February 2022. The bronchiectasis and control groups were compared in terms of demographics, lung function, asthma control test (ACT) results, exacerbation history, and respiratory medications. Among 140 non-severe asthmatic subjects, approximately 15.7% (n = 22) had bronchiectasis. The most common type of bronchiectasis was cylindrical type (90.7%). The left lingular division was the most frequently involved lung lobe (20.4%). There were no significant differences in the demographics (age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, and comorbidities) or ACT results between the 2 groups. The bronchiectasis group used inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-agonists (<i>P</i> = 0.074) and mucolytics (<i>P</i> < 0.001) more frequently than the control group. Compared to the control group, the bronchiectasis group had lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (L) (1.9 ± 0.7 L vs. 2.3 ± 0.9 L, <i>P</i> = 0.039) and FEV1%predicted (67.2 ± 22.2%predicted vs. 77.1 ± 20.0%predicted, <i>P</i> = 0.038). The rate of hospital admission to a general ward in the preceding year was significantly higher in the bronchiectasis group compared to those of the control group (23.8% vs. 3.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.005) with an adjusted odds ratio of 6.308 (95% confidence interval, 1.401-28.392). Patients with non-severe asthma and bronchiectasis had lower lung function and more frequent exacerbations requiring hospitalization than those without bronchiectasis. More attention is needed for asthmatic patients with bronchiectasis, even if the asthma is not severe.</p>","PeriodicalId":7547,"journal":{"name":"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research","volume":"16 3","pages":"291-299"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11199153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Bronchiectasis on the Clinical Characteristics of Non-Severe Asthma.\",\"authors\":\"Kyung-Il Han, Hyun Lee, Bo-Guen Kim, Yoomi Yeo, Tai Sun Park, Dong Won Park, Ji-Yong Moon, Sang-Heon Kim, Jang Won Sohn, Ho Joo Yoon, Tae Hyung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4168/aair.2024.16.3.291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current literature primarily delves into the relationship between bronchiectasis and severe asthma, and only a few studies have evaluated the impact of bronchiectasis in patients with non-severe asthma. Therefore, this study investigated the clinical impact of bronchiectasis in patients with non-severe asthma. A prospective observational study of 140 non-severe asthmatic patients with (bronchiectasis group) and without bronchiectasis (control group) was conducted between September 2012 and February 2022. The bronchiectasis and control groups were compared in terms of demographics, lung function, asthma control test (ACT) results, exacerbation history, and respiratory medications. Among 140 non-severe asthmatic subjects, approximately 15.7% (n = 22) had bronchiectasis. The most common type of bronchiectasis was cylindrical type (90.7%). The left lingular division was the most frequently involved lung lobe (20.4%). There were no significant differences in the demographics (age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, and comorbidities) or ACT results between the 2 groups. The bronchiectasis group used inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-agonists (<i>P</i> = 0.074) and mucolytics (<i>P</i> < 0.001) more frequently than the control group. Compared to the control group, the bronchiectasis group had lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (L) (1.9 ± 0.7 L vs. 2.3 ± 0.9 L, <i>P</i> = 0.039) and FEV1%predicted (67.2 ± 22.2%predicted vs. 77.1 ± 20.0%predicted, <i>P</i> = 0.038). The rate of hospital admission to a general ward in the preceding year was significantly higher in the bronchiectasis group compared to those of the control group (23.8% vs. 3.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.005) with an adjusted odds ratio of 6.308 (95% confidence interval, 1.401-28.392). Patients with non-severe asthma and bronchiectasis had lower lung function and more frequent exacerbations requiring hospitalization than those without bronchiectasis. More attention is needed for asthmatic patients with bronchiectasis, even if the asthma is not severe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"291-299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11199153/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2024.16.3.291\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2024.16.3.291","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的文献主要探讨支气管扩张与重症哮喘之间的关系,只有少数研究评估了支气管扩张对非重症哮喘患者的影响。因此,本研究调查了支气管扩张对非重度哮喘患者的临床影响。2012 年 9 月至 2022 年 2 月期间,对 140 名患有支气管扩张症的非重度哮喘患者(支气管扩张症组)和未患有支气管扩张症的非重度哮喘患者(对照组)进行了前瞻性观察研究。研究人员对支气管扩张组和对照组的人口统计学、肺功能、哮喘控制测试(ACT)结果、病情恶化史和呼吸系统药物进行了比较。在 140 名非重度哮喘患者中,约 15.7%(n = 22)患有支气管扩张。最常见的支气管扩张类型是圆柱型(90.7%)。最常受累的肺叶是左肺叶(20.4%)。两组患者在人口统计学(年龄、性别、体重指数、吸烟史和合并症)或 ACT 结果方面无明显差异。支气管扩张组吸入皮质类固醇激素/长效β2-激动剂(P = 0.074)和粘液溶解剂(P < 0.001)的使用频率高于对照组。与对照组相比,支气管扩张组的 1 秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)(L)(1.9 ± 0.7 L vs. 2.3 ± 0.9 L,P = 0.039)和 FEV1% 预测值(67.2 ± 22.2% 预测值 vs. 77.1 ± 20.0% 预测值,P = 0.038)均低于对照组。与对照组相比,支气管扩张组患者前一年入住普通病房的比例明显更高(23.8% vs. 3.5%,P = 0.005),调整后的几率比为 6.308(95% 置信区间,1.401-28.392)。与无支气管扩张的患者相比,非重度哮喘合并支气管扩张的患者肺功能更差,需要住院治疗的病情加重次数更多。即使哮喘并不严重,也需要对患有支气管扩张的哮喘患者给予更多关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Bronchiectasis on the Clinical Characteristics of Non-Severe Asthma.

Current literature primarily delves into the relationship between bronchiectasis and severe asthma, and only a few studies have evaluated the impact of bronchiectasis in patients with non-severe asthma. Therefore, this study investigated the clinical impact of bronchiectasis in patients with non-severe asthma. A prospective observational study of 140 non-severe asthmatic patients with (bronchiectasis group) and without bronchiectasis (control group) was conducted between September 2012 and February 2022. The bronchiectasis and control groups were compared in terms of demographics, lung function, asthma control test (ACT) results, exacerbation history, and respiratory medications. Among 140 non-severe asthmatic subjects, approximately 15.7% (n = 22) had bronchiectasis. The most common type of bronchiectasis was cylindrical type (90.7%). The left lingular division was the most frequently involved lung lobe (20.4%). There were no significant differences in the demographics (age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, and comorbidities) or ACT results between the 2 groups. The bronchiectasis group used inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-agonists (P = 0.074) and mucolytics (P < 0.001) more frequently than the control group. Compared to the control group, the bronchiectasis group had lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (L) (1.9 ± 0.7 L vs. 2.3 ± 0.9 L, P = 0.039) and FEV1%predicted (67.2 ± 22.2%predicted vs. 77.1 ± 20.0%predicted, P = 0.038). The rate of hospital admission to a general ward in the preceding year was significantly higher in the bronchiectasis group compared to those of the control group (23.8% vs. 3.5%, P = 0.005) with an adjusted odds ratio of 6.308 (95% confidence interval, 1.401-28.392). Patients with non-severe asthma and bronchiectasis had lower lung function and more frequent exacerbations requiring hospitalization than those without bronchiectasis. More attention is needed for asthmatic patients with bronchiectasis, even if the asthma is not severe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal features cutting-edge original research, brief communications, and state-of-the-art reviews in the specialties of allergy, asthma, and immunology, including clinical and experimental studies and instructive case reports. Contemporary reviews summarize information on topics for researchers and physicians in the fields of allergy and immunology. As of January 2017, AAIR do not accept case reports. However, if it is a clinically important case, authors can submit it in the form of letter to the Editor. Editorials and letters to the Editor explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion among physicians dealing with allergy, immunology, pediatric respirology, and related medical fields. AAIR also features topics in practice and management and recent advances in equipment and techniques for clinicians concerned with clinical manifestations of allergies and pediatric respiratory diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信