评估将有关膝关节内侧副韧带损伤的 YouTube 视频作为患者教育资源的可靠性和质量。

IF 2.7 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jason H Kim, Richard M Danilkowicz, Zachary D Meeker, Kyle R Wagner, Zeeshan A Khan, Jorge Chahla
{"title":"评估将有关膝关节内侧副韧带损伤的 YouTube 视频作为患者教育资源的可靠性和质量。","authors":"Jason H Kim, Richard M Danilkowicz, Zachary D Meeker, Kyle R Wagner, Zeeshan A Khan, Jorge Chahla","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the educational reliability and quality of videos shared on YouTube regarding medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries of the knee.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the search keywords \"medial collateral ligament\" on YouTube, the first 50 videos were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Video characteristics were extracted, and each video was categorized by upload source and content type. Three scoring systems were used to evaluate the videos: the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Score to assess a video's reliability; the Global Quality Score (GQS) to assess educational quality; the novel MCL Specific Score (MCL-SS) to assess MCL-specific content quality. Linear regression analyses were conducted to explore relationships between video characteristics and scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Collectively, the videos were viewed 5,759,427 times with a mean number of views per video of 115,189 ​± ​177,861. The mean JAMA score was 1.8, GQS was 2.1, and MCL-SS was 5.6, indicating both poor reliability and quality. Only videos uploaded by physicians showed a statistically significantly higher mean MCL-SS (P ​= ​0.032) but were still of low quality with a mean MCL-SS of 9.2 ​± ​5.9. Multivariate linear regression revealed that videos uploaded by physicians were statistically significant predictors of greater MCL-SS (β ​= ​4.108; P ​= ​0.029). Longer video durations were statistically significant predictors of greater GQS (β ​= ​0.001; P ​= ​0.002) and MCL-SS (β ​= ​0.007; P ​< ​0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>YouTube videos regarding MCL injuries, despite their popularity, were found to be on average having poor overall reliability and quality as measured by JAMA, GQS and MCL-SS.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"100288"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the reliability and quality of YouTube videos regarding medial collateral ligament knee injury as a patient education resource.\",\"authors\":\"Jason H Kim, Richard M Danilkowicz, Zachary D Meeker, Kyle R Wagner, Zeeshan A Khan, Jorge Chahla\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.06.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the educational reliability and quality of videos shared on YouTube regarding medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries of the knee.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the search keywords \\\"medial collateral ligament\\\" on YouTube, the first 50 videos were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Video characteristics were extracted, and each video was categorized by upload source and content type. Three scoring systems were used to evaluate the videos: the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Score to assess a video's reliability; the Global Quality Score (GQS) to assess educational quality; the novel MCL Specific Score (MCL-SS) to assess MCL-specific content quality. Linear regression analyses were conducted to explore relationships between video characteristics and scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Collectively, the videos were viewed 5,759,427 times with a mean number of views per video of 115,189 ​± ​177,861. The mean JAMA score was 1.8, GQS was 2.1, and MCL-SS was 5.6, indicating both poor reliability and quality. Only videos uploaded by physicians showed a statistically significantly higher mean MCL-SS (P ​= ​0.032) but were still of low quality with a mean MCL-SS of 9.2 ​± ​5.9. Multivariate linear regression revealed that videos uploaded by physicians were statistically significant predictors of greater MCL-SS (β ​= ​4.108; P ​= ​0.029). Longer video durations were statistically significant predictors of greater GQS (β ​= ​0.001; P ​= ​0.002) and MCL-SS (β ​= ​0.007; P ​< ​0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>YouTube videos regarding MCL injuries, despite their popularity, were found to be on average having poor overall reliability and quality as measured by JAMA, GQS and MCL-SS.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional Study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100288\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2024.06.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2024.06.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估 YouTube 上分享的有关膝关节内侧副韧带(MCL)损伤的视频的教育可靠性和质量:方法:使用 YouTube 上的搜索关键词 "内侧副韧带",由两名独立审查员对前 50 个视频进行评估。提取视频特征,并根据上传来源和内容类型对每个视频进行分类。评估视频时使用了三种评分系统:《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)基准评分(Benchmark Score)用于评估视频的可靠性;全球质量评分(Global Quality Score,GQS)用于评估教育质量;新颖的MCL特定评分(MCL-SS)用于评估MCL特定内容的质量。我们进行了线性回归分析,以探讨视频特征与评分之间的关系:总共有 5,759,427 人次观看了视频,每个视频的平均观看次数为 115,189 ± 177,861 次。平均 JAMA 分数为 1.8,GQS 为 2.1,MCL-SS 为 5.6,表明可靠性和质量都很差。只有医生上传的视频的平均 MCL-SS 高出很多(P = 0.032),但质量仍然很低,平均 MCL-SS 为 9.2 ± 5.9。多变量线性回归显示,医生上传的视频在统计学上可显著预测更高的 MCL-SS(β = 4.108;P = .029)。较长的视频持续时间对较大的 GQS (β = .001; P = .002) 和 MCL-SS (β = .007; P < .001) 有显著的统计学预测作用:结论:尽管YouTube上有关MCL损伤的视频很受欢迎,但根据JAMA、GQS和MCL-SS衡量,这些视频的整体可靠性和质量平均较差:证据级别:III - 横断面研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the reliability and quality of YouTube videos regarding medial collateral ligament knee injury as a patient education resource.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the educational reliability and quality of videos shared on YouTube regarding medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries of the knee.

Methods: Using the search keywords "medial collateral ligament" on YouTube, the first 50 videos were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Video characteristics were extracted, and each video was categorized by upload source and content type. Three scoring systems were used to evaluate the videos: the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Score to assess a video's reliability; the Global Quality Score (GQS) to assess educational quality; the novel MCL Specific Score (MCL-SS) to assess MCL-specific content quality. Linear regression analyses were conducted to explore relationships between video characteristics and scores.

Results: Collectively, the videos were viewed 5,759,427 times with a mean number of views per video of 115,189 ​± ​177,861. The mean JAMA score was 1.8, GQS was 2.1, and MCL-SS was 5.6, indicating both poor reliability and quality. Only videos uploaded by physicians showed a statistically significantly higher mean MCL-SS (P ​= ​0.032) but were still of low quality with a mean MCL-SS of 9.2 ​± ​5.9. Multivariate linear regression revealed that videos uploaded by physicians were statistically significant predictors of greater MCL-SS (β ​= ​4.108; P ​= ​0.029). Longer video durations were statistically significant predictors of greater GQS (β ​= ​0.001; P ​= ​0.002) and MCL-SS (β ​= ​0.007; P ​< ​0.001).

Conclusions: YouTube videos regarding MCL injuries, despite their popularity, were found to be on average having poor overall reliability and quality as measured by JAMA, GQS and MCL-SS.

Level of evidence: III.

Study design: Cross-sectional Study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信