阿尔法2受体激动剂在重症成人中的应用:关注镇静和戒断预防。

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of pharmacy practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1177/08971900241263171
Ashley Schuler, Connie H Yoon, Erica Caffarini, Alexander Heine, Alyssa Meester, Danielle Murray, Angela Harding
{"title":"阿尔法2受体激动剂在重症成人中的应用:关注镇静和戒断预防。","authors":"Ashley Schuler, Connie H Yoon, Erica Caffarini, Alexander Heine, Alyssa Meester, Danielle Murray, Angela Harding","doi":"10.1177/08971900241263171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The management of sedation in critically ill adults poses a unique challenge to clinicians. Dexmedetomidine, an α<sub>2</sub> agonist, has a unique mechanism and favorable pharmacokinetics, making it an attractive intravenous option for sedation and delirium in the intensive care unit. However, patients may be at risk for withdrawal with prolonged use, adding to the complexity of sedation and agitation management in this patient population. Enteral α<sub>2</sub> agents have the benefit of cost savings and ease of administration, thus playing a role in the ability to decrease intravenous sedative use and prevent dexmedetomidine withdrawal. Clonidine and guanfacine are the two most common enteral α<sub>2</sub> agents utilized for this purpose, however, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the comparative benefit between the two agents. The decision to use one vs the other agent should be determined based on their differing pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and side effect profile. The most effective dosing strategy for these agents is also unknown. Ultimately, more robust literature is required to determine enteral α<sub>2</sub> agonists place in therapy. This narrative review evaluates the currently available literature on the use of α<sub>2</sub> agonists in critically ill adults with an emphasis on sedation, delirium, and withdrawal.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"155-167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alpha2 Agonist Use in Critically Ill Adults: A Focus on Sedation and Withdrawal Prevention.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Schuler, Connie H Yoon, Erica Caffarini, Alexander Heine, Alyssa Meester, Danielle Murray, Angela Harding\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08971900241263171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The management of sedation in critically ill adults poses a unique challenge to clinicians. Dexmedetomidine, an α<sub>2</sub> agonist, has a unique mechanism and favorable pharmacokinetics, making it an attractive intravenous option for sedation and delirium in the intensive care unit. However, patients may be at risk for withdrawal with prolonged use, adding to the complexity of sedation and agitation management in this patient population. Enteral α<sub>2</sub> agents have the benefit of cost savings and ease of administration, thus playing a role in the ability to decrease intravenous sedative use and prevent dexmedetomidine withdrawal. Clonidine and guanfacine are the two most common enteral α<sub>2</sub> agents utilized for this purpose, however, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the comparative benefit between the two agents. The decision to use one vs the other agent should be determined based on their differing pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and side effect profile. The most effective dosing strategy for these agents is also unknown. Ultimately, more robust literature is required to determine enteral α<sub>2</sub> agonists place in therapy. This narrative review evaluates the currently available literature on the use of α<sub>2</sub> agonists in critically ill adults with an emphasis on sedation, delirium, and withdrawal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmacy practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"155-167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmacy practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241263171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241263171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重症成人患者的镇静管理给临床医生带来了独特的挑战。右美托咪定是α2受体激动剂,具有独特的机制和良好的药代动力学,是重症监护病房镇静和谵妄的静脉用药选择。然而,长期使用可能会使患者面临停药风险,从而增加了此类患者镇静和躁动管理的复杂性。肠内 α2制剂具有节约成本和易于给药的优点,因此在减少静脉镇静剂使用和防止右美托咪定戒断方面发挥了作用。氯尼地定和胍法辛是两种最常用的α2类肠内制剂,但关于这两种制剂的比较优势,目前还缺乏相关证据。在决定使用其中一种还是另一种药物时,应根据它们不同的药理学、药代动力学和副作用特征来决定。这些药物最有效的剂量策略也尚不清楚。最终,需要更多可靠的文献来确定肠道 α2受体激动剂在治疗中的地位。这篇叙述性综述评估了目前有关在成人重症患者中使用 α2 受体激动剂的文献,重点关注镇静、谵妄和戒断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alpha2 Agonist Use in Critically Ill Adults: A Focus on Sedation and Withdrawal Prevention.

The management of sedation in critically ill adults poses a unique challenge to clinicians. Dexmedetomidine, an α2 agonist, has a unique mechanism and favorable pharmacokinetics, making it an attractive intravenous option for sedation and delirium in the intensive care unit. However, patients may be at risk for withdrawal with prolonged use, adding to the complexity of sedation and agitation management in this patient population. Enteral α2 agents have the benefit of cost savings and ease of administration, thus playing a role in the ability to decrease intravenous sedative use and prevent dexmedetomidine withdrawal. Clonidine and guanfacine are the two most common enteral α2 agents utilized for this purpose, however, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the comparative benefit between the two agents. The decision to use one vs the other agent should be determined based on their differing pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and side effect profile. The most effective dosing strategy for these agents is also unknown. Ultimately, more robust literature is required to determine enteral α2 agonists place in therapy. This narrative review evaluates the currently available literature on the use of α2 agonists in critically ill adults with an emphasis on sedation, delirium, and withdrawal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信