Juliane Romahn, Damian Baranski, Alexandra Schmidt, Jérôme Kaiser, Helge Arz, Laura S. Epp, Anke Kremp, Miklós Bálint
{"title":"过去动态一瞥:一套新的浮游植物 sedaDNA 引物","authors":"Juliane Romahn, Damian Baranski, Alexandra Schmidt, Jérôme Kaiser, Helge Arz, Laura S. Epp, Anke Kremp, Miklós Bálint","doi":"10.1002/edn3.577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) offers an important opportunity for investigating long-term community dynamics. Nevertheless, sedaDNA is challenging since DNA is degraded and fragmented over time. Of particular interest for such sedaDNA studies are phytoplankton communities, which are sensitive environmental indicators and important producers in aquatic systems. So far, only a few suitable metabarcoding primers for sedaDNA targeting phytoplankton exist. In this study, we introduce new metabarcoding primers targeting cyanobacteria and dinoflagellates. They amplify short, ~200-bp ribosomal 16S and 18S DNA fragments. We compared these primers against published ones, uncovering distinct communities captured by different primer sets. The newly designed dinoflagellate and cyanobacterial primers revealed unique sets of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) compared to published primers, highlighting the impact of primer choice on describing community composition. We also explored the effect of amplicon length on metabarcoding success over a sample age. Observed trends suggest that amplification success decreases with longer amplicons, probably as a result of DNA degradation in older sediment samples. Lastly, strong DNA preservation challenges emerged in sediment samples older than 7000 BP, corresponding with oxic phases of the Baltic Sea bottom water. This emphasizes the importance of age, sediment type, and preservation conditions when interpreting sedaDNA results. Despite limitations in temporal resolution, the study shows that sedaDNA-based fluctuations in the phytoplankton community are consistent with well-known environmental stages. More research is necessary to understand (1) DNA preservation and its impact on reconstructed communities and (2) impact of abiotic conditions on phytoplankton communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.577","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glimpse of past dynamics: A new set of phytoplankton primers for sedaDNA\",\"authors\":\"Juliane Romahn, Damian Baranski, Alexandra Schmidt, Jérôme Kaiser, Helge Arz, Laura S. Epp, Anke Kremp, Miklós Bálint\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) offers an important opportunity for investigating long-term community dynamics. Nevertheless, sedaDNA is challenging since DNA is degraded and fragmented over time. Of particular interest for such sedaDNA studies are phytoplankton communities, which are sensitive environmental indicators and important producers in aquatic systems. So far, only a few suitable metabarcoding primers for sedaDNA targeting phytoplankton exist. In this study, we introduce new metabarcoding primers targeting cyanobacteria and dinoflagellates. They amplify short, ~200-bp ribosomal 16S and 18S DNA fragments. We compared these primers against published ones, uncovering distinct communities captured by different primer sets. The newly designed dinoflagellate and cyanobacterial primers revealed unique sets of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) compared to published primers, highlighting the impact of primer choice on describing community composition. We also explored the effect of amplicon length on metabarcoding success over a sample age. Observed trends suggest that amplification success decreases with longer amplicons, probably as a result of DNA degradation in older sediment samples. Lastly, strong DNA preservation challenges emerged in sediment samples older than 7000 BP, corresponding with oxic phases of the Baltic Sea bottom water. This emphasizes the importance of age, sediment type, and preservation conditions when interpreting sedaDNA results. Despite limitations in temporal resolution, the study shows that sedaDNA-based fluctuations in the phytoplankton community are consistent with well-known environmental stages. More research is necessary to understand (1) DNA preservation and its impact on reconstructed communities and (2) impact of abiotic conditions on phytoplankton communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.577\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
沉积古 DNA(sedaDNA)为研究长期群落动态提供了重要机会。然而,由于 DNA 会随着时间的推移而降解和破碎,因此沉积古 DNA 的研究具有挑战性。浮游植物群落是此类 sedaDNA 研究的重点,它们是敏感的环境指标,也是水生系统中的重要生产者。迄今为止,只有少数合适的针对浮游植物的沉积 DNA 代谢标引物。在本研究中,我们引入了针对蓝藻和甲藻的新型元标码引物。这些引物可扩增约 200-bp 的短核糖体 16S 和 18S DNA 片段。我们将这些引物与已发表的引物进行了比较,发现了不同引物组所捕获的不同群落。与已发表的引物相比,新设计的甲藻和蓝藻引物揭示了独特的扩增子序列变异(ASV)集,突出了引物选择对描述群落组成的影响。我们还探讨了扩增子长度对样本年代代谢标码成功率的影响。观察到的趋势表明,扩增成功率随扩增子长度的增加而降低,这可能是由于较老沉积物样本中 DNA 降解的结果。最后,在公元前 7000 年以前的沉积物样本中,DNA 的保存面临巨大挑战,这与波罗的海底层水的缺氧阶段相对应。这强调了在解释沉积 DNA 结果时年龄、沉积物类型和保存条件的重要性。尽管在时间分辨率方面存在局限性,但该研究表明,基于沉积 DNA 的浮游植物群落波动与众所周知的环境阶段是一致的。有必要开展更多研究,以了解:(1)DNA 的保存及其对重建群落的影响;(2)非生物条件对浮游植物群落的影响。
Glimpse of past dynamics: A new set of phytoplankton primers for sedaDNA
Sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) offers an important opportunity for investigating long-term community dynamics. Nevertheless, sedaDNA is challenging since DNA is degraded and fragmented over time. Of particular interest for such sedaDNA studies are phytoplankton communities, which are sensitive environmental indicators and important producers in aquatic systems. So far, only a few suitable metabarcoding primers for sedaDNA targeting phytoplankton exist. In this study, we introduce new metabarcoding primers targeting cyanobacteria and dinoflagellates. They amplify short, ~200-bp ribosomal 16S and 18S DNA fragments. We compared these primers against published ones, uncovering distinct communities captured by different primer sets. The newly designed dinoflagellate and cyanobacterial primers revealed unique sets of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) compared to published primers, highlighting the impact of primer choice on describing community composition. We also explored the effect of amplicon length on metabarcoding success over a sample age. Observed trends suggest that amplification success decreases with longer amplicons, probably as a result of DNA degradation in older sediment samples. Lastly, strong DNA preservation challenges emerged in sediment samples older than 7000 BP, corresponding with oxic phases of the Baltic Sea bottom water. This emphasizes the importance of age, sediment type, and preservation conditions when interpreting sedaDNA results. Despite limitations in temporal resolution, the study shows that sedaDNA-based fluctuations in the phytoplankton community are consistent with well-known environmental stages. More research is necessary to understand (1) DNA preservation and its impact on reconstructed communities and (2) impact of abiotic conditions on phytoplankton communities.