Carole Mathelin , Emmanuel Barranger , Martine Boisserie-Lacroix , Gérard Boutet , Susie Brousse , Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet , Charles Coutant , Emile Daraï , Yann Delpech , Martha Duraes , Marc Espié , Luc Fornecker , François Golfier , Pascale Grosclaude , Anne Sophie Hamy , Edith Kermarrec , Vincent Lavoué , Massimo Lodi , Élisabeth Luporsi , Christine M Maugard , Xavier Fritel
{"title":"降低乳房切除术风险的非遗传适应症:法国国家妇产科医师协会(CNGOF)指南","authors":"Carole Mathelin , Emmanuel Barranger , Martine Boisserie-Lacroix , Gérard Boutet , Susie Brousse , Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet , Charles Coutant , Emile Daraï , Yann Delpech , Martha Duraes , Marc Espié , Luc Fornecker , François Golfier , Pascale Grosclaude , Anne Sophie Hamy , Edith Kermarrec , Vincent Lavoué , Massimo Lodi , Élisabeth Luporsi , Christine M Maugard , Xavier Fritel","doi":"10.1016/j.ibreh.2024.100003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the value of performing a risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) in the absence of a deleterious variant of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, in 4 clinical situations at risk of breast cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>The French National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (CNGOF) Commission of Senology developed these recommendations. A policy of declaration and monitoring of links of interest was applied throughout the process of making the recommendations. Similarly, the development of these recommendations did not benefit from any funding from a company marketing a health product. The Commission of Senology adhered to the AGREE II (Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare) criteria and followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method to assess the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. The potential drawbacks of making recommendations in the presence of poor quality or insufficient evidence were highlighted.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>8 questions on 4 topics, focusing on histological, hereditary (except identified genetic abnormality), radiological (of unrecognized cancer), and radiation (history of Hodgkin's lymphoma) risks were considered. For each situation, it was determined whether performing RRM compared with surveillance would decrease the risk of developing breast cancer and/or increase survival.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The Commission of Senology synthesis and application of the GRADE method resulted in 11 recommendations, 6 with a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 5 with a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was significant agreement among the Commission of Senology members on recommendations to improve practices for performing or not performing RRM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100675,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Practice in Breast Health","volume":"1 ","pages":"Article 100003"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950212824000034/pdfft?md5=bd623db483b14e079371e70f3ab95ce3&pid=1-s2.0-S2950212824000034-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-genetic indications for risk reducing mastectomies: Guidelines of the national college of French gynecologists and obstetricians (CNGOF)\",\"authors\":\"Carole Mathelin , Emmanuel Barranger , Martine Boisserie-Lacroix , Gérard Boutet , Susie Brousse , Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet , Charles Coutant , Emile Daraï , Yann Delpech , Martha Duraes , Marc Espié , Luc Fornecker , François Golfier , Pascale Grosclaude , Anne Sophie Hamy , Edith Kermarrec , Vincent Lavoué , Massimo Lodi , Élisabeth Luporsi , Christine M Maugard , Xavier Fritel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ibreh.2024.100003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the value of performing a risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) in the absence of a deleterious variant of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, in 4 clinical situations at risk of breast cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>The French National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (CNGOF) Commission of Senology developed these recommendations. A policy of declaration and monitoring of links of interest was applied throughout the process of making the recommendations. Similarly, the development of these recommendations did not benefit from any funding from a company marketing a health product. The Commission of Senology adhered to the AGREE II (Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare) criteria and followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method to assess the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. The potential drawbacks of making recommendations in the presence of poor quality or insufficient evidence were highlighted.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>8 questions on 4 topics, focusing on histological, hereditary (except identified genetic abnormality), radiological (of unrecognized cancer), and radiation (history of Hodgkin's lymphoma) risks were considered. For each situation, it was determined whether performing RRM compared with surveillance would decrease the risk of developing breast cancer and/or increase survival.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The Commission of Senology synthesis and application of the GRADE method resulted in 11 recommendations, 6 with a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 5 with a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was significant agreement among the Commission of Senology members on recommendations to improve practices for performing or not performing RRM.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovative Practice in Breast Health\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950212824000034/pdfft?md5=bd623db483b14e079371e70f3ab95ce3&pid=1-s2.0-S2950212824000034-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovative Practice in Breast Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950212824000034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Practice in Breast Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950212824000034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Non-genetic indications for risk reducing mastectomies: Guidelines of the national college of French gynecologists and obstetricians (CNGOF)
Objective
To determine the value of performing a risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) in the absence of a deleterious variant of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, in 4 clinical situations at risk of breast cancer.
Design
The French National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (CNGOF) Commission of Senology developed these recommendations. A policy of declaration and monitoring of links of interest was applied throughout the process of making the recommendations. Similarly, the development of these recommendations did not benefit from any funding from a company marketing a health product. The Commission of Senology adhered to the AGREE II (Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare) criteria and followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method to assess the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. The potential drawbacks of making recommendations in the presence of poor quality or insufficient evidence were highlighted.
Methods
8 questions on 4 topics, focusing on histological, hereditary (except identified genetic abnormality), radiological (of unrecognized cancer), and radiation (history of Hodgkin's lymphoma) risks were considered. For each situation, it was determined whether performing RRM compared with surveillance would decrease the risk of developing breast cancer and/or increase survival.
Results
The Commission of Senology synthesis and application of the GRADE method resulted in 11 recommendations, 6 with a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 5 with a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-).
Conclusion
There was significant agreement among the Commission of Senology members on recommendations to improve practices for performing or not performing RRM.