定性饲料限制会影响罗斯 308 肉用种公鸡的挫败感、恐惧感、探索动机和羽毛疵点条纹

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Fernanda M. Tahamtani, Kathe E. Kittelsen, Guro Vasdal
{"title":"定性饲料限制会影响罗斯 308 肉用种公鸡的挫败感、恐惧感、探索动机和羽毛疵点条纹","authors":"Fernanda M. Tahamtani,&nbsp;Kathe E. Kittelsen,&nbsp;Guro Vasdal","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Broiler breeders show behaviours indicative of hunger and frustration stemming from unfulfilled behavioural needs for feeding. This is largely due to quantitative feed restriction which is common practice in the management of these birds, particularly in the rearing period. As an alternative, qualitative feed restriction allows a larger portion of feed to be provided without increasing the caloric intake. While several studies have assessed the effects of qualitative feeding on female broiler breeders, no such assessment has been done on broiler breeder cockerels. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of feed dilution and roughage on the level of stress, fear and motivation to explore of broiler breeder cockerels. 200 Ross 308 broiler breeder cockerels (between 5 and 10 weeks of age) were housed in 12 pens (6 pens/treatment), 17 birds/pen. The treatments were standard feed (Control) and feed diluted with 20 % insoluble oat hulls and 150 g of alfalfa roughage daily/pen (D+R). The D+R birds received 20 % more feed per day. Novel object (NO) and frustration during thwarted feeding tests were performed in the home pen and the response recorded with video cameras. In addition, four birds from each pen were subjected to a tonic immobility test (TI). All behavioural tests were performed once a week at 6, 8 and 10 weeks of age. Finally, after euthanasia, two feathers from each bird were plucked and macroscopically examined for the presence of fault bars. The control birds showed a tendency to approach the NO faster than the D+R birds (P = 0.07) and were more likely to approach at 10 weeks of age (P = 0.006). In the frustration test, D+R birds spent less time pecking the feed container (P = 0.049), more time standing (P = 0.01) and tended to have fewer behavioural transitions (P = 0.09) than control birds, which indicates a reduction in frustration levels. In addition, Control birds stayed in TI longer than D+R birds (160.7 ± 15.5 s and 98.1 ± 15.4, respectively. P = 0.005). However, D+R had more fault bars compared to Control birds (P = 0.02), highlighting that care is needed to interpret these contradicting results. Nevertheless, the results show that the combination of feed dilution and daily roughage can have positive effects on the welfare of broiler breeder cockerels by reducing the sensation of hunger as indicated by fear, frustration, and motivation to explore.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"276 ","pages":"Article 106327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124001758/pdfft?md5=421f11efe1be383f10444fb4a6331827&pid=1-s2.0-S0168159124001758-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative feed restriction affects frustration, fear, motivation to explore, and feather fault bars in Ross 308 broiler breeder cockerels\",\"authors\":\"Fernanda M. Tahamtani,&nbsp;Kathe E. Kittelsen,&nbsp;Guro Vasdal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Broiler breeders show behaviours indicative of hunger and frustration stemming from unfulfilled behavioural needs for feeding. This is largely due to quantitative feed restriction which is common practice in the management of these birds, particularly in the rearing period. As an alternative, qualitative feed restriction allows a larger portion of feed to be provided without increasing the caloric intake. While several studies have assessed the effects of qualitative feeding on female broiler breeders, no such assessment has been done on broiler breeder cockerels. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of feed dilution and roughage on the level of stress, fear and motivation to explore of broiler breeder cockerels. 200 Ross 308 broiler breeder cockerels (between 5 and 10 weeks of age) were housed in 12 pens (6 pens/treatment), 17 birds/pen. The treatments were standard feed (Control) and feed diluted with 20 % insoluble oat hulls and 150 g of alfalfa roughage daily/pen (D+R). The D+R birds received 20 % more feed per day. Novel object (NO) and frustration during thwarted feeding tests were performed in the home pen and the response recorded with video cameras. In addition, four birds from each pen were subjected to a tonic immobility test (TI). All behavioural tests were performed once a week at 6, 8 and 10 weeks of age. Finally, after euthanasia, two feathers from each bird were plucked and macroscopically examined for the presence of fault bars. The control birds showed a tendency to approach the NO faster than the D+R birds (P = 0.07) and were more likely to approach at 10 weeks of age (P = 0.006). In the frustration test, D+R birds spent less time pecking the feed container (P = 0.049), more time standing (P = 0.01) and tended to have fewer behavioural transitions (P = 0.09) than control birds, which indicates a reduction in frustration levels. In addition, Control birds stayed in TI longer than D+R birds (160.7 ± 15.5 s and 98.1 ± 15.4, respectively. P = 0.005). However, D+R had more fault bars compared to Control birds (P = 0.02), highlighting that care is needed to interpret these contradicting results. Nevertheless, the results show that the combination of feed dilution and daily roughage can have positive effects on the welfare of broiler breeder cockerels by reducing the sensation of hunger as indicated by fear, frustration, and motivation to explore.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"volume\":\"276 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124001758/pdfft?md5=421f11efe1be383f10444fb4a6331827&pid=1-s2.0-S0168159124001758-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124001758\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124001758","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肉用种鸡表现出饥饿和挫败感,这是因为它们对饲喂的行为需求得不到满足。这在很大程度上是由于定量限饲造成的,而定量限饲是肉鸡管理中的常见做法,尤其是在育雏期。作为一种替代方法,定性限饲可以在不增加热量摄入的情况下提供更多的饲料。虽然已有多项研究评估了定性饲喂对雌性肉种鸡的影响,但尚未对肉种公种鸡进行过此类评估。本研究的目的是调查饲料稀释和粗饲料对肉用种公鸡的应激水平、恐惧和探索动机的影响。200 只罗斯 308 肉用种公鸡(5 至 10 周龄)被饲养在 12 个栏(6 个栏/处理)中,每栏 17 只。处理方法为标准饲料(对照组)和每天每栏添加 20% 不溶性燕麦壳和 150 克苜蓿粗饲料的稀释饲料(D+R)。D+R每天多喂20%的饲料。在家禽圈中进行新奇物体(NO)和喂食受阻时的挫败感测试,并用摄像机记录其反应。此外,每个圈舍还对四只鸽子进行了强直性不动试验(TI)。所有行为测试在 6、8 和 10 周龄时每周进行一次。最后,在安乐死后,拔下每只鸟的两根羽毛,宏观检查是否存在断层条。对照组鸽子接近 NO 的速度比 D+R 组鸽子快(P = 0.07),并且在 10 周龄时更容易接近 NO(P = 0.006)。在挫折测试中,与对照组相比,D+R 组鸽子啄食饲料容器的时间更少(P = 0.049),站立的时间更长(P = 0.01),行为转换更少(P = 0.09),这表明挫折程度有所降低。此外,对照组比 D+R 组在 TI 中停留的时间更长(分别为 160.7 ± 15.5 秒和 98.1 ± 15.4 秒,P = 0.005)。然而,与对照组鸟类相比,D+R鸟类有更多的故障条(P = 0.02),这表明需要谨慎解释这些相互矛盾的结果。尽管如此,研究结果表明,将饲料稀释和每日粗饲料结合使用可降低肉用种公鸡的饥饿感(表现为恐惧、沮丧和探索动机),从而对其福利产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qualitative feed restriction affects frustration, fear, motivation to explore, and feather fault bars in Ross 308 broiler breeder cockerels

Broiler breeders show behaviours indicative of hunger and frustration stemming from unfulfilled behavioural needs for feeding. This is largely due to quantitative feed restriction which is common practice in the management of these birds, particularly in the rearing period. As an alternative, qualitative feed restriction allows a larger portion of feed to be provided without increasing the caloric intake. While several studies have assessed the effects of qualitative feeding on female broiler breeders, no such assessment has been done on broiler breeder cockerels. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of feed dilution and roughage on the level of stress, fear and motivation to explore of broiler breeder cockerels. 200 Ross 308 broiler breeder cockerels (between 5 and 10 weeks of age) were housed in 12 pens (6 pens/treatment), 17 birds/pen. The treatments were standard feed (Control) and feed diluted with 20 % insoluble oat hulls and 150 g of alfalfa roughage daily/pen (D+R). The D+R birds received 20 % more feed per day. Novel object (NO) and frustration during thwarted feeding tests were performed in the home pen and the response recorded with video cameras. In addition, four birds from each pen were subjected to a tonic immobility test (TI). All behavioural tests were performed once a week at 6, 8 and 10 weeks of age. Finally, after euthanasia, two feathers from each bird were plucked and macroscopically examined for the presence of fault bars. The control birds showed a tendency to approach the NO faster than the D+R birds (P = 0.07) and were more likely to approach at 10 weeks of age (P = 0.006). In the frustration test, D+R birds spent less time pecking the feed container (P = 0.049), more time standing (P = 0.01) and tended to have fewer behavioural transitions (P = 0.09) than control birds, which indicates a reduction in frustration levels. In addition, Control birds stayed in TI longer than D+R birds (160.7 ± 15.5 s and 98.1 ± 15.4, respectively. P = 0.005). However, D+R had more fault bars compared to Control birds (P = 0.02), highlighting that care is needed to interpret these contradicting results. Nevertheless, the results show that the combination of feed dilution and daily roughage can have positive effects on the welfare of broiler breeder cockerels by reducing the sensation of hunger as indicated by fear, frustration, and motivation to explore.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信