Émilien Schultz, Jeremy K Ward, Rajae Touzani, Alexandra Rouquette, Julien Mancini
{"title":"在健康与科学之间:健康素养与对医学研究的认识。","authors":"Émilien Schultz, Jeremy K Ward, Rajae Touzani, Alexandra Rouquette, Julien Mancini","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Biomedical innovation plays an important role in health care pathways and public debates. Nevertheless, existing measures of health literacy take little account of medical research. In this article, we explore the relationship between health literacy and attitudes toward medical research, from clinical trials to more general attitudes toward science.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyze the results of two self-administered questionnaires conducted on samples of the French adult population in 2020 and 2021 (N=2003 and N=2022). A series of twelve questions assessed health literacy (HLS19-Q12-EN) and ten questions addressed attitudes to clinical trials, medical research, and science in general. The analyses characterize the population’s perception of medical research issues and its association with health literacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is a significant association between health literacy and perception of research. A low level of literacy is associated with lower knowledge of clinical trials and a more negative attitude toward them, less confidence in science and its contributions to society.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the continuity between care and research, health literacy is likely to be a relevant measure for characterizing disparity in attitudes toward clinical trials and improving access to innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entre santé et science : littératie en santé et perception de la recherche médicale.\",\"authors\":\"Émilien Schultz, Jeremy K Ward, Rajae Touzani, Alexandra Rouquette, Julien Mancini\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Biomedical innovation plays an important role in health care pathways and public debates. Nevertheless, existing measures of health literacy take little account of medical research. In this article, we explore the relationship between health literacy and attitudes toward medical research, from clinical trials to more general attitudes toward science.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyze the results of two self-administered questionnaires conducted on samples of the French adult population in 2020 and 2021 (N=2003 and N=2022). A series of twelve questions assessed health literacy (HLS19-Q12-EN) and ten questions addressed attitudes to clinical trials, medical research, and science in general. The analyses characterize the population’s perception of medical research issues and its association with health literacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is a significant association between health literacy and perception of research. A low level of literacy is associated with lower knowledge of clinical trials and a more negative attitude toward them, less confidence in science and its contributions to society.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the continuity between care and research, health literacy is likely to be a relevant measure for characterizing disparity in attitudes toward clinical trials and improving access to innovation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sante Publique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sante Publique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Entre santé et science : littératie en santé et perception de la recherche médicale.
Objective: Biomedical innovation plays an important role in health care pathways and public debates. Nevertheless, existing measures of health literacy take little account of medical research. In this article, we explore the relationship between health literacy and attitudes toward medical research, from clinical trials to more general attitudes toward science.
Methods: We analyze the results of two self-administered questionnaires conducted on samples of the French adult population in 2020 and 2021 (N=2003 and N=2022). A series of twelve questions assessed health literacy (HLS19-Q12-EN) and ten questions addressed attitudes to clinical trials, medical research, and science in general. The analyses characterize the population’s perception of medical research issues and its association with health literacy.
Results: There is a significant association between health literacy and perception of research. A low level of literacy is associated with lower knowledge of clinical trials and a more negative attitude toward them, less confidence in science and its contributions to society.
Conclusions: Given the continuity between care and research, health literacy is likely to be a relevant measure for characterizing disparity in attitudes toward clinical trials and improving access to innovation.
期刊介绍:
La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs,
professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie
des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions
de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de
soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale.
Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur
l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants
et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé,
organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques
de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation
et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille
sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents
secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique
d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources,
politiques de régulation et de financement, etc