罕见的巧合:甲状腺激素免疫测定中的巨甲状腺刺激素和多种制造商特异性干扰。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1177/00045632241262920
Ingo Mrosewski, Viola Dannheim, Robert Klett, Matthias Urbank, Silvia Stobbe, Jochen R Ittner, Martin Bidlingmaier
{"title":"罕见的巧合:甲状腺激素免疫测定中的巨甲状腺刺激素和多种制造商特异性干扰。","authors":"Ingo Mrosewski, Viola Dannheim, Robert Klett, Matthias Urbank, Silvia Stobbe, Jochen R Ittner, Martin Bidlingmaier","doi":"10.1177/00045632241262920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immunoassays are widely used for laboratory assessment of endocrine functions including thyroid hormones. While usually adequate for patient evaluation, they are known to potentially suffer from interference from a variety of factors. We report the case of a 44 year-old male patient without clinical symptoms of thyroid disease who presented for specialist evaluation after pathological thyroid function tests prompted a transferal by his primary care practitioner. Thyroid function tests showed discrepant results across immunoassays and platforms of different manufacturers. Polyethylene glycol precipitation prompted the diagnosis of macro-thyroid-stimulating hormone, while heterophilic and non-specific antibody blocking reagents proved ineffective in eliminating the interference in thyroid-stimulating hormone, free triiodothyronine and free thyroxine measurements. Further assessment ruled out a diagnosis of familial dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinemia, leaving an exclusion diagnosis of manufacturer-specific interference in free triiodothyronine and free thyroxine assays due to unknown factors. Both clinicians and laboratory specialists must be aware of potential interference in immunoassays which otherwise might be misleading, potentially triggering unnecessary (invasive) follow-up procedures or therapeutic interventions. Close communication is required for successful troubleshooting. To our knowledge, no other case of both macro-thyroid-stimulating hormone and manufacturer-specific interference in a single patient has been documented thus far.</p>","PeriodicalId":8005,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"484-489"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rare coincidence: Macro-thyroid-stimulating hormone and multiple manufacturer-specific interferences in thyroid hormone immunoassays.\",\"authors\":\"Ingo Mrosewski, Viola Dannheim, Robert Klett, Matthias Urbank, Silvia Stobbe, Jochen R Ittner, Martin Bidlingmaier\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00045632241262920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Immunoassays are widely used for laboratory assessment of endocrine functions including thyroid hormones. While usually adequate for patient evaluation, they are known to potentially suffer from interference from a variety of factors. We report the case of a 44 year-old male patient without clinical symptoms of thyroid disease who presented for specialist evaluation after pathological thyroid function tests prompted a transferal by his primary care practitioner. Thyroid function tests showed discrepant results across immunoassays and platforms of different manufacturers. Polyethylene glycol precipitation prompted the diagnosis of macro-thyroid-stimulating hormone, while heterophilic and non-specific antibody blocking reagents proved ineffective in eliminating the interference in thyroid-stimulating hormone, free triiodothyronine and free thyroxine measurements. Further assessment ruled out a diagnosis of familial dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinemia, leaving an exclusion diagnosis of manufacturer-specific interference in free triiodothyronine and free thyroxine assays due to unknown factors. Both clinicians and laboratory specialists must be aware of potential interference in immunoassays which otherwise might be misleading, potentially triggering unnecessary (invasive) follow-up procedures or therapeutic interventions. Close communication is required for successful troubleshooting. To our knowledge, no other case of both macro-thyroid-stimulating hormone and manufacturer-specific interference in a single patient has been documented thus far.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"484-489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632241262920\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632241262920","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免疫测定被广泛用于包括甲状腺激素在内的内分泌功能的实验室评估。虽然免疫测定通常足以对患者进行评估,但众所周知,免疫测定可能会受到各种因素的干扰。我们报告了一例 44 岁男性患者的病例,他没有甲状腺疾病的临床症状,在初级保健医生要求转院后,他接受了病理甲状腺功能检测,并接受了专科评估。甲状腺功能检测显示,不同厂家生产的免疫测定和平台得出的结果存在差异。聚乙二醇沉淀提示了大促甲状腺激素的诊断,而嗜异性和非特异性抗体阻断试剂无法有效消除促甲状腺激素、游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸和游离甲状腺素测量的干扰。进一步的评估排除了家族性白蛋白血症性高甲状腺素血症的诊断,剩下的排除诊断是游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸和游离甲状腺素测定中由于未知因素造成的制造商特异性干扰。临床医生和实验室专家都必须意识到免疫测定中的潜在干扰,否则可能会产生误导,引发不必要的(侵入性)后续程序或治疗干预。要想成功排除故障,就必须密切沟通。据我们所知,迄今为止,还没有其他病例在一名患者身上同时出现大促甲状腺激素和制造商特异性干扰的记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rare coincidence: Macro-thyroid-stimulating hormone and multiple manufacturer-specific interferences in thyroid hormone immunoassays.

Immunoassays are widely used for laboratory assessment of endocrine functions including thyroid hormones. While usually adequate for patient evaluation, they are known to potentially suffer from interference from a variety of factors. We report the case of a 44 year-old male patient without clinical symptoms of thyroid disease who presented for specialist evaluation after pathological thyroid function tests prompted a transferal by his primary care practitioner. Thyroid function tests showed discrepant results across immunoassays and platforms of different manufacturers. Polyethylene glycol precipitation prompted the diagnosis of macro-thyroid-stimulating hormone, while heterophilic and non-specific antibody blocking reagents proved ineffective in eliminating the interference in thyroid-stimulating hormone, free triiodothyronine and free thyroxine measurements. Further assessment ruled out a diagnosis of familial dysalbuminemic hyperthyroxinemia, leaving an exclusion diagnosis of manufacturer-specific interference in free triiodothyronine and free thyroxine assays due to unknown factors. Both clinicians and laboratory specialists must be aware of potential interference in immunoassays which otherwise might be misleading, potentially triggering unnecessary (invasive) follow-up procedures or therapeutic interventions. Close communication is required for successful troubleshooting. To our knowledge, no other case of both macro-thyroid-stimulating hormone and manufacturer-specific interference in a single patient has been documented thus far.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is the fully peer reviewed international journal of the Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry accepts papers that contribute to knowledge in all fields of laboratory medicine, especially those pertaining to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of human disease. It publishes papers on clinical biochemistry, clinical audit, metabolic medicine, immunology, genetics, biotechnology, haematology, microbiology, computing and management where they have both biochemical and clinical relevance. Papers describing evaluation or implementation of commercial reagent kits or the performance of new analysers require substantial original information. Unless of exceptional interest and novelty, studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not generally considered within the journal''s scope. Studies documenting the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with particular phenotypes will not normally be considered, given the greater strength of genome wide association studies (GWAS). Research undertaken in non-human animals will not be considered for publication in the Annals. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is also the official journal of NVKC (de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie) and JSCC (Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信