切除的肺腺癌的临床病理特征和生存结果:日本全国登记数据的结果。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
{"title":"切除的肺腺癌的临床病理特征和生存结果:日本全国登记数据的结果。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2024.05.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objective of this study was to clarify the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of resected lung adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) using a nationwide multi-institutional database.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed the records of 15,542 patients who underwent complete R0 resection for ASC (n = 326), adenocarcinoma (AC, n = 11,820), or squamous cell carcinoma (SC, n = 3396) from a Japanese lung cancer registry in 2010. To reduce the selection bias, an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method using a propensity score was implemented.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ASC group showed worse recurrence-free and overall survival (RFS and OS) than both the AC and SC groups (5-year OS: 57.5% in ASC, 83.9% in AC [&lt; 0.001], and 62.3% in SC [<em>P</em> = .086]). In multivariate analyses, prognostic factors that affected OS for ASC included male, p-stage II-III, and postoperative complications within 30 days (grade ≥ 3 in the Clavien–Dindo classification). The sensitizing <em>EGFR</em> mutation was detected in 28 (21.5%) of 130 screened patients with ASC, but it did not affect either RFS, OS, or postrecurrence survival. Although more patients in the ASC group received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to the AC and SC groups, both multivariate and IPTW-adjusted analyses did not show positive impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on RFS and OS in ASC.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this nationwide registry study, lung ASC was more aggressive than both AC and SC. No apparent survival impact of conventional adjuvant chemotherapy prompted us to investigate novel adjuvant strategies to optimize survival outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"25 6","pages":"Pages 519-528.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730424001074/pdfft?md5=6c89cecd835bca966a9b78547b6e0efa&pid=1-s2.0-S1525730424001074-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicopathological Features and Survival Outcomes of Resected Lung Adenosquamous Carcinoma: Results From a Nationwide Japanese Registry Data\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cllc.2024.05.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objective of this study was to clarify the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of resected lung adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) using a nationwide multi-institutional database.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed the records of 15,542 patients who underwent complete R0 resection for ASC (n = 326), adenocarcinoma (AC, n = 11,820), or squamous cell carcinoma (SC, n = 3396) from a Japanese lung cancer registry in 2010. To reduce the selection bias, an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method using a propensity score was implemented.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ASC group showed worse recurrence-free and overall survival (RFS and OS) than both the AC and SC groups (5-year OS: 57.5% in ASC, 83.9% in AC [&lt; 0.001], and 62.3% in SC [<em>P</em> = .086]). In multivariate analyses, prognostic factors that affected OS for ASC included male, p-stage II-III, and postoperative complications within 30 days (grade ≥ 3 in the Clavien–Dindo classification). The sensitizing <em>EGFR</em> mutation was detected in 28 (21.5%) of 130 screened patients with ASC, but it did not affect either RFS, OS, or postrecurrence survival. Although more patients in the ASC group received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to the AC and SC groups, both multivariate and IPTW-adjusted analyses did not show positive impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on RFS and OS in ASC.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this nationwide registry study, lung ASC was more aggressive than both AC and SC. No apparent survival impact of conventional adjuvant chemotherapy prompted us to investigate novel adjuvant strategies to optimize survival outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"volume\":\"25 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 519-528.e3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730424001074/pdfft?md5=6c89cecd835bca966a9b78547b6e0efa&pid=1-s2.0-S1525730424001074-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730424001074\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730424001074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究的目的是利用一个全国性的多机构数据库,明确切除的肺腺癌(ASC)的临床病理特征和预后因素:我们回顾性检索了2010年日本肺癌登记处的15542名患者的记录,这些患者因ASC(326人)、腺癌(AC,11820人)或鳞癌(SC,3396人)接受了完全R0切除术。为减少选择偏差,采用了倾向评分的逆治疗概率加权法(IPTW):ASC组的无复发生存率和总生存率(RFS和OS)均低于AC组和SC组(5年OS:ASC为57.5%,AC为83.9%[<0.001],SC为62.3%[P = .086])。在多变量分析中,影响ASC患者OS的预后因素包括男性、P分期II-III期和术后30天内的并发症(Clavien-Dindo分级≥3级)。在筛查出的130名ASC患者中,有28人(21.5%)检测到了致敏的表皮生长因子受体突变,但这并不影响RFS、OS或复发后生存率。虽然与AC组和SC组相比,ASC组接受辅助化疗的患者更多,但多变量分析和IPTW调整分析均未显示辅助化疗对ASC的RFS和OS有积极影响:在这项全国范围的登记研究中,肺ASC比AC和SC更具侵袭性。结论:在这项全国性的登记研究中,肺部ASC比AC和SC更具侵袭性,常规辅助化疗对生存没有明显影响,这促使我们研究新的辅助策略,以优化生存结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinicopathological Features and Survival Outcomes of Resected Lung Adenosquamous Carcinoma: Results From a Nationwide Japanese Registry Data

Clinicopathological Features and Survival Outcomes of Resected Lung Adenosquamous Carcinoma: Results From a Nationwide Japanese Registry Data

Objectives

The objective of this study was to clarify the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of resected lung adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) using a nationwide multi-institutional database.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 15,542 patients who underwent complete R0 resection for ASC (n = 326), adenocarcinoma (AC, n = 11,820), or squamous cell carcinoma (SC, n = 3396) from a Japanese lung cancer registry in 2010. To reduce the selection bias, an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method using a propensity score was implemented.

Results

The ASC group showed worse recurrence-free and overall survival (RFS and OS) than both the AC and SC groups (5-year OS: 57.5% in ASC, 83.9% in AC [< 0.001], and 62.3% in SC [P = .086]). In multivariate analyses, prognostic factors that affected OS for ASC included male, p-stage II-III, and postoperative complications within 30 days (grade ≥ 3 in the Clavien–Dindo classification). The sensitizing EGFR mutation was detected in 28 (21.5%) of 130 screened patients with ASC, but it did not affect either RFS, OS, or postrecurrence survival. Although more patients in the ASC group received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to the AC and SC groups, both multivariate and IPTW-adjusted analyses did not show positive impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on RFS and OS in ASC.

Conclusions

In this nationwide registry study, lung ASC was more aggressive than both AC and SC. No apparent survival impact of conventional adjuvant chemotherapy prompted us to investigate novel adjuvant strategies to optimize survival outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical lung cancer
Clinical lung cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信