机器人服务跨学科研究回顾(1954-2023):从寄生到共生

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Ying Zeng , Xinyi Liu , Xinyuan Zhang , Zhiyong Li
{"title":"机器人服务跨学科研究回顾(1954-2023):从寄生到共生","authors":"Ying Zeng ,&nbsp;Xinyi Liu ,&nbsp;Xinyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhiyong Li","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social distancing and low-touch services have been fuelled by the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to a paradoxical dilemma for service providers to balance high-quality service and low-touch demand. The introduction of robot services has emerged as a possible solution, yet its full potential in fostering a user-friendly modern society remains underexplored. Our goal is to address this gap via a comprehensive analysis of 16,255 interdisciplinary articles published between 1954 and 2023, elucidating the intellectual, social, and conceptual frameworks underpinning robot service research. Using a parasitical evolutionary lens, which incorporates various stages from low-level parasitism to symbiosis, we investigated the dynamic relationship between robot services and related technologies. Furthermore, we pinpointed six primary application areas for robot services, and charted their historical development, current status, and evolving issues. Additionally, we analysed robot service applications in contemporary society, offering both cross-domain and domain-specific insights. Theoretically, our research combines the integrated interdisciplinary narrative with the evolutionary technological parasitism perspectives on deconstructing robot services research. This contributes to bridging the gap between theory and practice, and expanding the boundaries of applying technology parasitism theory in answering real-world questions. Empirically, this study provides valuable insights for shaping management and innovation policies in this field. Specifically, the opportunities, threats, and future research agendas highlighted in this study can aid the work of policymakers, strategists, and technology implementation teams.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective of interdisciplinary research on robot services (1954–2023): From parasitism to symbiosis\",\"authors\":\"Ying Zeng ,&nbsp;Xinyi Liu ,&nbsp;Xinyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhiyong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Social distancing and low-touch services have been fuelled by the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to a paradoxical dilemma for service providers to balance high-quality service and low-touch demand. The introduction of robot services has emerged as a possible solution, yet its full potential in fostering a user-friendly modern society remains underexplored. Our goal is to address this gap via a comprehensive analysis of 16,255 interdisciplinary articles published between 1954 and 2023, elucidating the intellectual, social, and conceptual frameworks underpinning robot service research. Using a parasitical evolutionary lens, which incorporates various stages from low-level parasitism to symbiosis, we investigated the dynamic relationship between robot services and related technologies. Furthermore, we pinpointed six primary application areas for robot services, and charted their historical development, current status, and evolving issues. Additionally, we analysed robot service applications in contemporary society, offering both cross-domain and domain-specific insights. Theoretically, our research combines the integrated interdisciplinary narrative with the evolutionary technological parasitism perspectives on deconstructing robot services research. This contributes to bridging the gap between theory and practice, and expanding the boundaries of applying technology parasitism theory in answering real-world questions. Empirically, this study provides valuable insights for shaping management and innovation policies in this field. Specifically, the opportunities, threats, and future research agendas highlighted in this study can aid the work of policymakers, strategists, and technology implementation teams.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24001842\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24001842","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 大流行加剧了社会疏离和低接触服务,导致服务提供商面临着平衡高质量服务和低接触需求的矛盾困境。引入机器人服务已成为一种可能的解决方案,但其在促进用户友好型现代社会方面的全部潜力仍未得到充分发掘。我们的目标是通过对 1954 年至 2023 年间发表的 16255 篇跨学科文章进行全面分析,阐明机器人服务研究的知识、社会和概念框架,从而填补这一空白。我们采用寄生进化视角(包含从低级寄生到共生的各个阶段),研究了机器人服务与相关技术之间的动态关系。此外,我们还指出了机器人服务的六个主要应用领域,并描绘了它们的历史发展、现状和不断演变的问题。此外,我们还分析了机器人服务在当代社会中的应用,提出了跨领域和特定领域的见解。从理论上讲,我们的研究结合了跨学科综合叙事和进化技术寄生的视角来解构机器人服务研究。这有助于弥合理论与实践之间的差距,拓展应用技术寄生理论回答现实世界问题的边界。从经验角度看,本研究为制定该领域的管理和创新政策提供了有价值的见解。具体来说,本研究中强调的机遇、威胁和未来研究议程可以帮助政策制定者、战略家和技术实施团队开展工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective of interdisciplinary research on robot services (1954–2023): From parasitism to symbiosis

Social distancing and low-touch services have been fuelled by the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to a paradoxical dilemma for service providers to balance high-quality service and low-touch demand. The introduction of robot services has emerged as a possible solution, yet its full potential in fostering a user-friendly modern society remains underexplored. Our goal is to address this gap via a comprehensive analysis of 16,255 interdisciplinary articles published between 1954 and 2023, elucidating the intellectual, social, and conceptual frameworks underpinning robot service research. Using a parasitical evolutionary lens, which incorporates various stages from low-level parasitism to symbiosis, we investigated the dynamic relationship between robot services and related technologies. Furthermore, we pinpointed six primary application areas for robot services, and charted their historical development, current status, and evolving issues. Additionally, we analysed robot service applications in contemporary society, offering both cross-domain and domain-specific insights. Theoretically, our research combines the integrated interdisciplinary narrative with the evolutionary technological parasitism perspectives on deconstructing robot services research. This contributes to bridging the gap between theory and practice, and expanding the boundaries of applying technology parasitism theory in answering real-world questions. Empirically, this study provides valuable insights for shaping management and innovation policies in this field. Specifically, the opportunities, threats, and future research agendas highlighted in this study can aid the work of policymakers, strategists, and technology implementation teams.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信