快速浅呼吸指数在预测成功断奶方面的临床实用性:COBRE-US 试验的二次分析。

Fabio Varón-Vega , Eduardo Tuta-Quintero , Henry Robayo-Amortegui , Adriana Rincón , Luis F. Giraldo-Cadavid , Jonathan Palacios , Stephanie Crevoisier , Diana C. Duarte , Marcela Poveda , Laura Cucunubo , Pablo Monedero
{"title":"快速浅呼吸指数在预测成功断奶方面的临床实用性:COBRE-US 试验的二次分析。","authors":"Fabio Varón-Vega ,&nbsp;Eduardo Tuta-Quintero ,&nbsp;Henry Robayo-Amortegui ,&nbsp;Adriana Rincón ,&nbsp;Luis F. Giraldo-Cadavid ,&nbsp;Jonathan Palacios ,&nbsp;Stephanie Crevoisier ,&nbsp;Diana C. Duarte ,&nbsp;Marcela Poveda ,&nbsp;Laura Cucunubo ,&nbsp;Pablo Monedero","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div><span><span>To assess the predictive capacity of the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI) for success in </span>spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) and </span>extubation<span> in critically ill patients. We evaluated the association between RSBI, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ventilator-free time at 28 days.</span></div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective multicenter observational study. Secondary analysis of the COBRE-US study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Intensive care unit (ICU).</div></div><div><h3>Patients or participants</h3><div>367 patients in the ICU receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Assessment of RSBI at the end of SBT.</div></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><div>RSBI, SBT, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ventilator-free time at 28 days were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>367 patients in the ICU under invasive mechanical ventilation were evaluated, of whom 59.7% were male with a median age of 61 years (IQR: 49–72). A total of 456 SBT were conducted with a success rate of 76.5%. RSBI had a ROC-curve of 0.53 for SBT success and a ROC-curve of 0.48 for extubation. The Spearman correlation coefficient between RSBI and duration of ventilation was 0.117 (p = 0.026), while for ventilator-free time at 28 days, it was −0.116 (p = 0.028).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RSBI was not associated with success in SBT or extubation, regardless of the cutoff point used. Correlation analyses showed weak associations between RSBI and both the duration of ventilation and ventilator-free time at 28 days.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":"49 2","pages":"Pages 72-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical utility of rapid shallow breathing index in predicting successful weaning: secondary analysis of the COBRE-US trial\",\"authors\":\"Fabio Varón-Vega ,&nbsp;Eduardo Tuta-Quintero ,&nbsp;Henry Robayo-Amortegui ,&nbsp;Adriana Rincón ,&nbsp;Luis F. Giraldo-Cadavid ,&nbsp;Jonathan Palacios ,&nbsp;Stephanie Crevoisier ,&nbsp;Diana C. Duarte ,&nbsp;Marcela Poveda ,&nbsp;Laura Cucunubo ,&nbsp;Pablo Monedero\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medine.2024.06.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div><span><span>To assess the predictive capacity of the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI) for success in </span>spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) and </span>extubation<span> in critically ill patients. We evaluated the association between RSBI, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ventilator-free time at 28 days.</span></div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective multicenter observational study. Secondary analysis of the COBRE-US study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Intensive care unit (ICU).</div></div><div><h3>Patients or participants</h3><div>367 patients in the ICU receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Assessment of RSBI at the end of SBT.</div></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><div>RSBI, SBT, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ventilator-free time at 28 days were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>367 patients in the ICU under invasive mechanical ventilation were evaluated, of whom 59.7% were male with a median age of 61 years (IQR: 49–72). A total of 456 SBT were conducted with a success rate of 76.5%. RSBI had a ROC-curve of 0.53 for SBT success and a ROC-curve of 0.48 for extubation. The Spearman correlation coefficient between RSBI and duration of ventilation was 0.117 (p = 0.026), while for ventilator-free time at 28 days, it was −0.116 (p = 0.028).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RSBI was not associated with success in SBT or extubation, regardless of the cutoff point used. Correlation analyses showed weak associations between RSBI and both the duration of ventilation and ventilator-free time at 28 days.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"volume\":\"49 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 72-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173572724001450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173572724001450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估快速浅呼吸指数(RSBI)对重症患者自主呼吸试验(SBT)和拔管成功的预测能力。我们评估了 RSBI、机械通气持续时间和 28 天无呼吸机时间之间的关联:设计:前瞻性多中心观察研究。COBRE-US研究的二次分析:重症监护病房(ICU):367名接受有创机械通气的重症监护病房患者:主要关注变量:RSBI、SBT、持续时间:评估RSBI、SBT、机械通气持续时间和28天无呼吸机时间:结果:共评估了367名在重症监护室接受有创机械通气的患者,其中59.7%为男性,中位年龄为61岁(IQR:49-72)。共进行了 456 次 SBT,成功率为 76.5%。RSBI 对 SBT 成功率的 ROC 曲线为 0.53,对拔管率的 ROC 曲线为 0.48。RSBI与通气时间的斯皮尔曼相关系数为0.117(p = 0.026),而28天无呼吸机时间的斯皮尔曼相关系数为-0.116(p = 0.028):无论采用哪种截断点,RSBI 都与 SBT 或拔管成功率无关。相关分析表明,RSBI 与通气持续时间和 28 天无呼吸机时间之间的相关性较弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical utility of rapid shallow breathing index in predicting successful weaning: secondary analysis of the COBRE-US trial

Objective

To assess the predictive capacity of the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI) for success in spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) and extubation in critically ill patients. We evaluated the association between RSBI, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ventilator-free time at 28 days.

Design

Prospective multicenter observational study. Secondary analysis of the COBRE-US study.

Setting

Intensive care unit (ICU).

Patients or participants

367 patients in the ICU receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.

Interventions

Assessment of RSBI at the end of SBT.

Main variables of interest

RSBI, SBT, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ventilator-free time at 28 days were evaluated.

Results

367 patients in the ICU under invasive mechanical ventilation were evaluated, of whom 59.7% were male with a median age of 61 years (IQR: 49–72). A total of 456 SBT were conducted with a success rate of 76.5%. RSBI had a ROC-curve of 0.53 for SBT success and a ROC-curve of 0.48 for extubation. The Spearman correlation coefficient between RSBI and duration of ventilation was 0.117 (p = 0.026), while for ventilator-free time at 28 days, it was −0.116 (p = 0.028).

Conclusions

RSBI was not associated with success in SBT or extubation, regardless of the cutoff point used. Correlation analyses showed weak associations between RSBI and both the duration of ventilation and ventilator-free time at 28 days.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信