内上髁处尺神经的超声波测量与电诊断研究的相关性

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
HAND Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1177/15589447241259805
Nicholas F Aloi, Rachel Hyzny, John R Fowler
{"title":"内上髁处尺神经的超声波测量与电诊断研究的相关性","authors":"Nicholas F Aloi, Rachel Hyzny, John R Fowler","doi":"10.1177/15589447241259805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common compressive neuropathy in the upper extremity and is commonly evaluated with electrodiagnostic studies (EDS). Ultrasound (US) has emerged as a potentially more efficient alternative to EDS. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether measurements of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the ulnar nerve at the elbow correlate with EDS results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a prospective analysis of patients who presented with signs and symptoms consistent of cubital tunnel syndrome, who received USs of the ulnar nerve at the elbow and nerve conduction tests. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the correlation between ulnar nerve CSA and electrodiagnostic data. <i>t</i> Tests were used to evaluate statistical differences between the mean ulnar nerve CSA of patients with positive or negative nerve conduction study results. Youden Index was used to calculate the optimal cut-off point for US CSA based on maximal sensitivity and specificity. Statistical significance was based on a two-sided <i>P</i> less than .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The association between increasing US CSA at the medial epicondyle with slowing of the conduction velocity of the ulnar motor nerve across the elbow was statistically significant (<i>r</i> = -0.35, <i>P</i> = .02). Patients with positive EDS tests had significantly larger nerve size than those with negative tests (all <i>P</i>s < .03). A cut-off point of greater than or equal to 11 mm<sup>2</sup> had a sensitivity of 70.83% and specificity of 66.67%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Larger ulnar nerve CSAs correlate with slowing of the conduction velocity on EDSs, and those with positive EDSs have larger nerve sizes than those with negative tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"1064-1070"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound Measurements of the Ulnar Nerve at the Medial Epicondyle Correlate With Electrodiagnostic Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas F Aloi, Rachel Hyzny, John R Fowler\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15589447241259805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common compressive neuropathy in the upper extremity and is commonly evaluated with electrodiagnostic studies (EDS). Ultrasound (US) has emerged as a potentially more efficient alternative to EDS. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether measurements of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the ulnar nerve at the elbow correlate with EDS results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a prospective analysis of patients who presented with signs and symptoms consistent of cubital tunnel syndrome, who received USs of the ulnar nerve at the elbow and nerve conduction tests. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the correlation between ulnar nerve CSA and electrodiagnostic data. <i>t</i> Tests were used to evaluate statistical differences between the mean ulnar nerve CSA of patients with positive or negative nerve conduction study results. Youden Index was used to calculate the optimal cut-off point for US CSA based on maximal sensitivity and specificity. Statistical significance was based on a two-sided <i>P</i> less than .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The association between increasing US CSA at the medial epicondyle with slowing of the conduction velocity of the ulnar motor nerve across the elbow was statistically significant (<i>r</i> = -0.35, <i>P</i> = .02). Patients with positive EDS tests had significantly larger nerve size than those with negative tests (all <i>P</i>s < .03). A cut-off point of greater than or equal to 11 mm<sup>2</sup> had a sensitivity of 70.83% and specificity of 66.67%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Larger ulnar nerve CSAs correlate with slowing of the conduction velocity on EDSs, and those with positive EDSs have larger nerve sizes than those with negative tests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HAND\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1064-1070\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571372/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HAND\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447241259805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447241259805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:眶管综合征是上肢第二大常见的压迫性神经病,通常采用电诊断研究(EDS)进行评估。超声波(US)已成为替代 EDS 的更有效的方法。本研究旨在评估肘部尺神经横截面积(CSA)的测量结果是否与 EDS 结果相关:本研究是一项前瞻性分析,研究对象是出现与肘管综合征一致的体征和症状、接受肘部尺神经超声波检查和神经传导测试的患者。皮尔逊相关系数用于评估尺神经CSA与电诊断数据之间的相关性。t检验用于评估神经传导检查结果为阳性或阴性的患者尺神经CSA平均值之间的统计学差异。Youden 指数用于计算基于最大灵敏度和特异性的尺神经 CSA 最佳临界点。统计显著性基于双侧 P 小于 .05:结果:内上髁的 US CSA 增加与尺骨运动神经在整个肘部的传导速度减慢之间的关系具有统计学意义(r = -0.35,P = .02)。EDS测试呈阳性的患者的神经尺寸明显大于测试呈阴性的患者(所有Ps均小于0.03)。大于或等于 11 平方毫米的分界点灵敏度为 70.83%,特异性为 66.67%:结论:尺神经CSA较大与EDSs传导速度减慢相关,EDSs阳性者的神经尺寸大于阴性者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound Measurements of the Ulnar Nerve at the Medial Epicondyle Correlate With Electrodiagnostic Studies.

Background: Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common compressive neuropathy in the upper extremity and is commonly evaluated with electrodiagnostic studies (EDS). Ultrasound (US) has emerged as a potentially more efficient alternative to EDS. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether measurements of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the ulnar nerve at the elbow correlate with EDS results.

Methods: This study was a prospective analysis of patients who presented with signs and symptoms consistent of cubital tunnel syndrome, who received USs of the ulnar nerve at the elbow and nerve conduction tests. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the correlation between ulnar nerve CSA and electrodiagnostic data. t Tests were used to evaluate statistical differences between the mean ulnar nerve CSA of patients with positive or negative nerve conduction study results. Youden Index was used to calculate the optimal cut-off point for US CSA based on maximal sensitivity and specificity. Statistical significance was based on a two-sided P less than .05.

Results: The association between increasing US CSA at the medial epicondyle with slowing of the conduction velocity of the ulnar motor nerve across the elbow was statistically significant (r = -0.35, P = .02). Patients with positive EDS tests had significantly larger nerve size than those with negative tests (all Ps < .03). A cut-off point of greater than or equal to 11 mm2 had a sensitivity of 70.83% and specificity of 66.67%.

Conclusions: Larger ulnar nerve CSAs correlate with slowing of the conduction velocity on EDSs, and those with positive EDSs have larger nerve sizes than those with negative tests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信