OBSERVE 研究中肥胖或超重参与者的减重偏好:共同决策的机会。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
{"title":"OBSERVE 研究中肥胖或超重参与者的减重偏好:共同决策的机会。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.eprac.2024.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Limited recent evidence exists regarding weight-reduction preferences among people with obesity in the United States (US). We assessed preferred magnitudes of weight reduction among adults with obesity and how these preferences differ by participant characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Perceptions, Barriers, and Opportunities for Anti-obesity Medications in Obesity Care: A Survey of Patients, Providers and Employers was a cross-sectional study assessing perceptions of obesity and anti-obesity medications among people with obesity, healthcare providers, and employers in the US. Adults with obesity and overweight with obesity-related complications self-reported current weight and weight they associated with 5 preferences (“dream,” “goal,” “happy,” “acceptable,” and “disappointed.”) Preferred percent weight reductions for each preference were calculated. Multivariable regression analyses were performed identifying associations between weight-reduction preferences and participant characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 1007 participants (women: 63.6%; White: 41.0%; Black or African American: 28.9%; Asian: 6.5%; Hispanic: 15.3%; and median body mass index (BMI): 34.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Median preferred percent weight reductions were dream = 23.5%; goal = 16.7%; happy = 14.6%; acceptable = 10.3%; and disappointed = 4.8%. Women reported higher preferred weight reductions than men. Preferred weight reductions among Black/African American participants were lower than White participants. Regression analyses indicated significant associations, with higher preferred magnitudes of weight reduction within females, higher weight self-stigma, and BMI class in Hispanic participants compared to White.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this large, real-world study, preferred magnitudes of weight reduction exceeded outcomes typically achieved with established nonsurgical obesity treatments but may be attained with bariatric procedures and newer and emerging anti-obesity medications. Respecting patients’ preferences for treatment goals with obesity management could help support shared decision-making. Evaluating for an individual’s contributors to weight preferences, such as weight self-stigma, can further benefit holistic obesity care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11682,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Practice","volume":"30 10","pages":"Pages 917-926"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weight-Reduction Preferences Among OBSERVE Study Participants With Obesity or Overweight: Opportunities for Shared Decision-Making\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eprac.2024.06.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Limited recent evidence exists regarding weight-reduction preferences among people with obesity in the United States (US). We assessed preferred magnitudes of weight reduction among adults with obesity and how these preferences differ by participant characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Perceptions, Barriers, and Opportunities for Anti-obesity Medications in Obesity Care: A Survey of Patients, Providers and Employers was a cross-sectional study assessing perceptions of obesity and anti-obesity medications among people with obesity, healthcare providers, and employers in the US. Adults with obesity and overweight with obesity-related complications self-reported current weight and weight they associated with 5 preferences (“dream,” “goal,” “happy,” “acceptable,” and “disappointed.”) Preferred percent weight reductions for each preference were calculated. Multivariable regression analyses were performed identifying associations between weight-reduction preferences and participant characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 1007 participants (women: 63.6%; White: 41.0%; Black or African American: 28.9%; Asian: 6.5%; Hispanic: 15.3%; and median body mass index (BMI): 34.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Median preferred percent weight reductions were dream = 23.5%; goal = 16.7%; happy = 14.6%; acceptable = 10.3%; and disappointed = 4.8%. Women reported higher preferred weight reductions than men. Preferred weight reductions among Black/African American participants were lower than White participants. Regression analyses indicated significant associations, with higher preferred magnitudes of weight reduction within females, higher weight self-stigma, and BMI class in Hispanic participants compared to White.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this large, real-world study, preferred magnitudes of weight reduction exceeded outcomes typically achieved with established nonsurgical obesity treatments but may be attained with bariatric procedures and newer and emerging anti-obesity medications. Respecting patients’ preferences for treatment goals with obesity management could help support shared decision-making. Evaluating for an individual’s contributors to weight preferences, such as weight self-stigma, can further benefit holistic obesity care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrine Practice\",\"volume\":\"30 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 917-926\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrine Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1530891X24005640\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1530891X24005640","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:有关美国肥胖症患者减重偏好的最新证据有限。我们评估了成人肥胖症患者对减重幅度的偏好,以及这些偏好因参与者的特征而有所不同:OBSERVE 是一项横断面研究,评估美国肥胖症患者、医疗保健提供者和雇主对肥胖症和抗肥胖药物(AOMs)的看法。患有肥胖症和超重并伴有肥胖相关并发症的成年人自我报告了目前的体重以及他们与 5 种偏好("梦想"、"目标"、"快乐"、"可接受 "和 "失望")相关的体重。计算出每种偏好的首选减重百分比。进行了多变量回归分析,以确定减重偏好与参与者特征之间的关联:该研究包括 1007 名参与者(女性:63.6%;白人:41.0%;黑人或非裔美国人:28.9%;亚裔:6.5%;西班牙裔:15.3%;体重指数[BMI]中位数:34.2 kg/m2):34.2 kg/m2)。首选减重百分比中位数为:梦想=23.5%;目标=16.7%;高兴=14.6%;可接受=10.3%;失望=4.8%。女性报告的首选体重减轻率高于男性。黑人/非裔美国人参与者的首选体重降低率低于白人参与者。回归分析表明,与白人相比,女性的首选减重幅度更高,体重自我耻辱感更高,西班牙裔参与者的体重指数等级更高:结论:在这一大型真实世界研究中,首选的体重减轻幅度超过了已确立的非手术肥胖症治疗方法所能达到的效果,但减肥手术和新兴的AOMs可能也能达到这一效果。尊重患者对肥胖症治疗目标的偏好有助于支持共同决策。评估导致体重偏好的个人因素,如体重自我耻辱感,可进一步促进整体肥胖护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Weight-Reduction Preferences Among OBSERVE Study Participants With Obesity or Overweight: Opportunities for Shared Decision-Making

Objective

Limited recent evidence exists regarding weight-reduction preferences among people with obesity in the United States (US). We assessed preferred magnitudes of weight reduction among adults with obesity and how these preferences differ by participant characteristics.

Methods

The Perceptions, Barriers, and Opportunities for Anti-obesity Medications in Obesity Care: A Survey of Patients, Providers and Employers was a cross-sectional study assessing perceptions of obesity and anti-obesity medications among people with obesity, healthcare providers, and employers in the US. Adults with obesity and overweight with obesity-related complications self-reported current weight and weight they associated with 5 preferences (“dream,” “goal,” “happy,” “acceptable,” and “disappointed.”) Preferred percent weight reductions for each preference were calculated. Multivariable regression analyses were performed identifying associations between weight-reduction preferences and participant characteristics.

Results

The study included 1007 participants (women: 63.6%; White: 41.0%; Black or African American: 28.9%; Asian: 6.5%; Hispanic: 15.3%; and median body mass index (BMI): 34.2 kg/m2). Median preferred percent weight reductions were dream = 23.5%; goal = 16.7%; happy = 14.6%; acceptable = 10.3%; and disappointed = 4.8%. Women reported higher preferred weight reductions than men. Preferred weight reductions among Black/African American participants were lower than White participants. Regression analyses indicated significant associations, with higher preferred magnitudes of weight reduction within females, higher weight self-stigma, and BMI class in Hispanic participants compared to White.

Conclusion

In this large, real-world study, preferred magnitudes of weight reduction exceeded outcomes typically achieved with established nonsurgical obesity treatments but may be attained with bariatric procedures and newer and emerging anti-obesity medications. Respecting patients’ preferences for treatment goals with obesity management could help support shared decision-making. Evaluating for an individual’s contributors to weight preferences, such as weight self-stigma, can further benefit holistic obesity care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine Practice
Endocrine Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
546
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Endocrine Practice (ISSN: 1530-891X), a peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year, is the official journal of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE). The primary mission of Endocrine Practice is to enhance the health care of patients with endocrine diseases through continuing education of practicing endocrinologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信