通过儿童保育补贴政策,扩大马里兰州低收入家庭获得高质量早期保育和教育的机会

IF 3.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Tamara Halle, Jing Tang, Emily Theresa Maxfield, Cassandra Simons Gerson, Alexandra Verhoye, Rebecca Madill, Gabriel Piña, Patti Banghart Gottesman, Bonnie Solomon, Sage Caballero-Acosta, Ying-Chun Lin, James Fuller, Sarah Kelley
{"title":"通过儿童保育补贴政策,扩大马里兰州低收入家庭获得高质量早期保育和教育的机会","authors":"Tamara Halle,&nbsp;Jing Tang,&nbsp;Emily Theresa Maxfield,&nbsp;Cassandra Simons Gerson,&nbsp;Alexandra Verhoye,&nbsp;Rebecca Madill,&nbsp;Gabriel Piña,&nbsp;Patti Banghart Gottesman,&nbsp;Bonnie Solomon,&nbsp;Sage Caballero-Acosta,&nbsp;Ying-Chun Lin,&nbsp;James Fuller,&nbsp;Sarah Kelley","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Documenting how federal and state child care policies increase equitable access to high-quality early care and education (ECE) for families with low- and moderate-incomes remains a challenge in part due to overlaps in policy enactment. This study used an interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) to describe changes to providers’ participation in Maryland's child care subsidy program following implementation of a constellation of child care policies enacted between January 5, 2015, and March 2, 2020 (i.e., prior to the COVID-19 pandemic). Findings indicate a marked increase in the percentage of licensed family child care (FCC) and center-based providers serving children with a subsidy following increases in household income eligibility levels and provider reimbursement rates in 2018. Provider participation rates varied by neighborhood income level, with participation expanding more in neighborhoods with lower poverty density relative to their starting level in 2015. Changes in child participation rates by income eligibility mirrored changes in state subsidy policy: children residing in income-eligible households above 200 % federal poverty level represented 4.4 % of the child sample in 2018, 13 % in 2019, and 18 % in 2020. The proportion of children with a subsidy who used higher-rated ECE increased significantly between January 2018 and January 2020 for all racial/ethnic groups, income eligibility levels, and urbanicity categories. The majority (62 %) of children who stayed in the subsidy program between 2018 and 2019 stayed with their same provider, many of which obtained their first rating or increased their quality rating during this time frame in accordance with a new requirement for providers to participate in the state's quality rating system to receive a subsidy reimbursement. Implications for future research, policy, and practice are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"69 ","pages":"Pages 1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expanding access to high-quality early care and education for families with low-income in Maryland through child care subsidy policies\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Halle,&nbsp;Jing Tang,&nbsp;Emily Theresa Maxfield,&nbsp;Cassandra Simons Gerson,&nbsp;Alexandra Verhoye,&nbsp;Rebecca Madill,&nbsp;Gabriel Piña,&nbsp;Patti Banghart Gottesman,&nbsp;Bonnie Solomon,&nbsp;Sage Caballero-Acosta,&nbsp;Ying-Chun Lin,&nbsp;James Fuller,&nbsp;Sarah Kelley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Documenting how federal and state child care policies increase equitable access to high-quality early care and education (ECE) for families with low- and moderate-incomes remains a challenge in part due to overlaps in policy enactment. This study used an interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) to describe changes to providers’ participation in Maryland's child care subsidy program following implementation of a constellation of child care policies enacted between January 5, 2015, and March 2, 2020 (i.e., prior to the COVID-19 pandemic). Findings indicate a marked increase in the percentage of licensed family child care (FCC) and center-based providers serving children with a subsidy following increases in household income eligibility levels and provider reimbursement rates in 2018. Provider participation rates varied by neighborhood income level, with participation expanding more in neighborhoods with lower poverty density relative to their starting level in 2015. Changes in child participation rates by income eligibility mirrored changes in state subsidy policy: children residing in income-eligible households above 200 % federal poverty level represented 4.4 % of the child sample in 2018, 13 % in 2019, and 18 % in 2020. The proportion of children with a subsidy who used higher-rated ECE increased significantly between January 2018 and January 2020 for all racial/ethnic groups, income eligibility levels, and urbanicity categories. The majority (62 %) of children who stayed in the subsidy program between 2018 and 2019 stayed with their same provider, many of which obtained their first rating or increased their quality rating during this time frame in accordance with a new requirement for providers to participate in the state's quality rating system to receive a subsidy reimbursement. Implications for future research, policy, and practice are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Childhood Research Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"69 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Childhood Research Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624000589\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624000589","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

记录联邦和州的托儿政策如何增加中低收入家庭公平获得高质量早期保育和教育(ECE)的机会仍然是一项挑战,部分原因是政策颁布的重叠。本研究采用间断时间序列分析法(ITSA)描述了在 2015 年 1 月 5 日至 2020 年 3 月 2 日(即 COVID-19 大流行之前)期间颁布的一系列托儿政策实施后,托儿机构参与马里兰州托儿补贴计划的变化情况。研究结果表明,在 2018 年提高家庭收入资格水平和托儿所补偿率后,获得许可的家庭托儿所(FCC)和中心托儿所为儿童提供补贴的比例明显增加。托儿所的参与率因社区收入水平而异,相对于 2015 年的起始水平,贫困人口密度较低的社区的参与率扩大得更多。按收入资格划分的儿童参与率变化反映了州补贴政策的变化:2018 年,居住在联邦贫困线 200% 以上的符合收入资格家庭的儿童占儿童样本的 4.4%,2019 年占 13%,2020 年占 18%。2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月期间,在所有种族/民族群体、收入资格水平和城市化类别中,获得补贴的儿童中使用较高评级幼儿教育的比例均显著增加。大多数(62%)在 2018 年至 2019 年期间留在补贴计划中的儿童都留在了同一个托儿所,其中许多托儿所在此期间获得了首次评级或提高了质量评级,这符合托儿所必须参加州质量评级系统才能获得补贴补偿的新要求。本文讨论了未来研究、政策和实践的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expanding access to high-quality early care and education for families with low-income in Maryland through child care subsidy policies

Documenting how federal and state child care policies increase equitable access to high-quality early care and education (ECE) for families with low- and moderate-incomes remains a challenge in part due to overlaps in policy enactment. This study used an interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) to describe changes to providers’ participation in Maryland's child care subsidy program following implementation of a constellation of child care policies enacted between January 5, 2015, and March 2, 2020 (i.e., prior to the COVID-19 pandemic). Findings indicate a marked increase in the percentage of licensed family child care (FCC) and center-based providers serving children with a subsidy following increases in household income eligibility levels and provider reimbursement rates in 2018. Provider participation rates varied by neighborhood income level, with participation expanding more in neighborhoods with lower poverty density relative to their starting level in 2015. Changes in child participation rates by income eligibility mirrored changes in state subsidy policy: children residing in income-eligible households above 200 % federal poverty level represented 4.4 % of the child sample in 2018, 13 % in 2019, and 18 % in 2020. The proportion of children with a subsidy who used higher-rated ECE increased significantly between January 2018 and January 2020 for all racial/ethnic groups, income eligibility levels, and urbanicity categories. The majority (62 %) of children who stayed in the subsidy program between 2018 and 2019 stayed with their same provider, many of which obtained their first rating or increased their quality rating during this time frame in accordance with a new requirement for providers to participate in the state's quality rating system to receive a subsidy reimbursement. Implications for future research, policy, and practice are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信