通过双示踪剂 PET/计算机断层扫描增强肝外肝细胞癌转移的分期:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nuclear Medicine Communications Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1097/MNM.0000000000001870
Alisa Mohebbi, Iman Kiani, Saeed Mohammadzadeh, Mohammad Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari, Afshin Mohammadi, Seyed Mohammad Tavangar
{"title":"通过双示踪剂 PET/计算机断层扫描增强肝外肝细胞癌转移的分期:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Alisa Mohebbi, Iman Kiani, Saeed Mohammadzadeh, Mohammad Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari, Afshin Mohammadi, Seyed Mohammad Tavangar","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to quantify the diagnostic value of dual-tracer PET/computed tomography (CT) with 11 C-acetate and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in per-lesion and per-patient and its effect on clinical decision-making for choosing the most appropriate management. The study protocol is registered a priori at https://osf.io/rvm75/ . PubMed, Web of Science, Embase , and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies until 1 June 2023. Studies regarding the review question were included. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to assess bias risk. Per-lesion and per-patient diagnostic performance were calculated for: (1) 11 C-acetate alone; (2) FDG alone; and (3) dual tracer of 11 C-acetate and FDG. A direct comparison of these three combinations was made. The possible sources of statistical heterogeneity were also examined. We also calculated the percentage change in clinical decision-making when dual-tracer PET/CT was added to conventional imaging routinely used for metastatic evaluation (CT/MRI). Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations tool was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. Eight studies including 521 patients and 672 metastatic lesions were included. Dual-tracer PET/CT had a per-lesion sensitivity of 96.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 91.8-98.4%] and per-patient sensitivity of 95.5% (95% CI, 89.1-98.2%) which were highly superior to either of tracers alone. Per-patient specificity was 98.5% (84.1-99.9%) which was similar to either of tracers alone. Overall, 9.3% (95% CI, 4.7-13.9%) of the patients had their management beneficially altered by adding dual-tracer PET/CT to their conventional CT/MRI results. Dual-tracer PET/CT substantially outperforms single-tracer methods in detecting extrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma metastases, evidencing its reliability and significant role in refining clinical management strategies based on robust diagnostic performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced staging of extrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis through dual-tracer PET/computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alisa Mohebbi, Iman Kiani, Saeed Mohammadzadeh, Mohammad Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari, Afshin Mohammadi, Seyed Mohammad Tavangar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to quantify the diagnostic value of dual-tracer PET/computed tomography (CT) with 11 C-acetate and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in per-lesion and per-patient and its effect on clinical decision-making for choosing the most appropriate management. The study protocol is registered a priori at https://osf.io/rvm75/ . PubMed, Web of Science, Embase , and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies until 1 June 2023. Studies regarding the review question were included. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to assess bias risk. Per-lesion and per-patient diagnostic performance were calculated for: (1) 11 C-acetate alone; (2) FDG alone; and (3) dual tracer of 11 C-acetate and FDG. A direct comparison of these three combinations was made. The possible sources of statistical heterogeneity were also examined. We also calculated the percentage change in clinical decision-making when dual-tracer PET/CT was added to conventional imaging routinely used for metastatic evaluation (CT/MRI). Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations tool was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. Eight studies including 521 patients and 672 metastatic lesions were included. Dual-tracer PET/CT had a per-lesion sensitivity of 96.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 91.8-98.4%] and per-patient sensitivity of 95.5% (95% CI, 89.1-98.2%) which were highly superior to either of tracers alone. Per-patient specificity was 98.5% (84.1-99.9%) which was similar to either of tracers alone. Overall, 9.3% (95% CI, 4.7-13.9%) of the patients had their management beneficially altered by adding dual-tracer PET/CT to their conventional CT/MRI results. Dual-tracer PET/CT substantially outperforms single-tracer methods in detecting extrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma metastases, evidencing its reliability and significant role in refining clinical management strategies based on robust diagnostic performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Medicine Communications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Medicine Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001870\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001870","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在量化 11C-acetate 和氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)双示踪 PET/ 计算机断层扫描(CT)对每个病灶和每个患者的诊断价值,及其对选择最合适治疗方法的临床决策的影响。研究方案已事先在 https://osf.io/rvm75/ 上注册。我们在 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 上检索了截至 2023 年 6 月 1 日的相关研究。纳入了与综述问题相关的研究。诊断准确性研究质量评估-2(QUADAS-2)用于评估偏倚风险。计算了每个韧带和每个患者的诊断效果:(1)单用 11C-乙酸酯;(2)单用 FDG;(3)11C-乙酸酯和 FDG 双示踪。对这三种组合进行了直接比较。我们还研究了统计异质性的可能来源。我们还计算了在常规转移评估成像(CT/MRI)的基础上增加双示踪 PET/CT 对临床决策的改变百分比。推荐、评估、发展和评价分级工具用于评估证据的确定性。共纳入 8 项研究,包括 521 名患者和 672 个转移病灶。双示踪剂 PET/CT 对每个病灶的灵敏度为 96.3% [95% 置信区间 (CI),91.8-98.4%],对每位患者的灵敏度为 95.5%(95% CI,89.1-98.2%),均大大优于单独使用其中一种示踪剂。每名患者的特异性为 98.5%(84.1-99.9%),与单独使用其中一种示踪剂相似。总体而言,9.3%(95% CI,4.7-13.9%)的患者在常规 CT/MRI 检查结果的基础上增加了双示踪剂 PET/CT 检查,从而使他们的治疗方法发生了有益的改变。在检测肝外肝细胞癌转移方面,双示踪剂PET/CT大大优于单示踪剂方法,这证明了它的可靠性以及在根据可靠的诊断性能完善临床管理策略方面的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhanced staging of extrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis through dual-tracer PET/computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this study was to quantify the diagnostic value of dual-tracer PET/computed tomography (CT) with 11 C-acetate and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in per-lesion and per-patient and its effect on clinical decision-making for choosing the most appropriate management. The study protocol is registered a priori at https://osf.io/rvm75/ . PubMed, Web of Science, Embase , and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies until 1 June 2023. Studies regarding the review question were included. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to assess bias risk. Per-lesion and per-patient diagnostic performance were calculated for: (1) 11 C-acetate alone; (2) FDG alone; and (3) dual tracer of 11 C-acetate and FDG. A direct comparison of these three combinations was made. The possible sources of statistical heterogeneity were also examined. We also calculated the percentage change in clinical decision-making when dual-tracer PET/CT was added to conventional imaging routinely used for metastatic evaluation (CT/MRI). Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations tool was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. Eight studies including 521 patients and 672 metastatic lesions were included. Dual-tracer PET/CT had a per-lesion sensitivity of 96.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 91.8-98.4%] and per-patient sensitivity of 95.5% (95% CI, 89.1-98.2%) which were highly superior to either of tracers alone. Per-patient specificity was 98.5% (84.1-99.9%) which was similar to either of tracers alone. Overall, 9.3% (95% CI, 4.7-13.9%) of the patients had their management beneficially altered by adding dual-tracer PET/CT to their conventional CT/MRI results. Dual-tracer PET/CT substantially outperforms single-tracer methods in detecting extrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma metastases, evidencing its reliability and significant role in refining clinical management strategies based on robust diagnostic performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信