传统急性偏头痛和预防性偏头痛治疗模式相关结果的三年跟踪研究:美国基于行政索赔的队列研究。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Headache Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1111/head.14741
Shivang Joshi, Andrew Spargo, Margaret Hoyt, Tommaso Panni, Lars Viktrup, Gilwan Kim, Anthony Hasan, Yan Yun Liu, Armen Zakharyan
{"title":"传统急性偏头痛和预防性偏头痛治疗模式相关结果的三年跟踪研究:美国基于行政索赔的队列研究。","authors":"Shivang Joshi, Andrew Spargo, Margaret Hoyt, Tommaso Panni, Lars Viktrup, Gilwan Kim, Anthony Hasan, Yan Yun Liu, Armen Zakharyan","doi":"10.1111/head.14741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe treatment patterns and direct healthcare costs over 3 years following initiation of standard of care acute and preventive migraine medications in patients with migraine in the United States.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>There are limited data on long-term (>1 year) migraine treatments patterns and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, observational cohort study using US claims data from the IBM<sup>®</sup> MarketScan<sup>®</sup> Research Database (January 2010-December 2017). Adults were included if they had a prescription claim for acute migraine treatments (AMT) or preventive migraine treatments (PMT) in the index period (January 2011-December 2014). The AMT cohort was categorized as persistent, cycled, or added-on subgroups; the PMT cohort was categorized PMT-persistent, switched without gaps, or cycled with gaps. Migraine-specific annual direct costs (2017 US$) across AMT and PMT cohort subgroups were summarized at baseline through 3 years from index (follow-up).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the index period, 20,778 and 42,259 patients initiated an AMT and a PMT, respectively. At the 3-year follow-up, migraine-specific direct costs were lower in the persistent subgroup relative to the non-persistent subgroups in both AMT (mean [SD]: $789 [$1741] vs. $2847 [$8149] in the added-on subgroup and $862 [$5426] for the cycled subgroup) and PMT cohorts (mean [SD]: $1817 [$5892] in the persistent subgroup vs. $4257 [$11,392] in the switched without gaps subgroup and $3269 [$18,540] in the cycled with gaps subgroup). Acute medication overuse was lower in the persistent subgroup (1025/6504 [27.2%]) vs. non-persistent subgroups (11,236/58,863 [32.2%] in cycled with gaps subgroup and 1431/6504 [39.4%] in the switched without gaps subgroup). Most patients used multiple acute (19,717/20,778 [94.9%]) or preventive (38,494/42,259 [91.1%]) pharmacological therapies over 3 years following treatment initiation. Gaps in preventive therapy were common; an average gap ranged from 85 to 211 days (~3-7 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Migraine-specific annual healthcare costs and acute migraine medication overuse remained lowest among patients with persistent AMT and PMT versus non-persistent treatment. Study findings are limited to the US population. Future studies should compare costs and associated outcomes between newer preventive migraine medications in patients with migraine.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"796-809"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A 3-year follow-up study of outcomes associated with patterns of traditional acute and preventive migraine treatment: An administrative claims-based cohort study in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Shivang Joshi, Andrew Spargo, Margaret Hoyt, Tommaso Panni, Lars Viktrup, Gilwan Kim, Anthony Hasan, Yan Yun Liu, Armen Zakharyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/head.14741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe treatment patterns and direct healthcare costs over 3 years following initiation of standard of care acute and preventive migraine medications in patients with migraine in the United States.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>There are limited data on long-term (>1 year) migraine treatments patterns and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, observational cohort study using US claims data from the IBM<sup>®</sup> MarketScan<sup>®</sup> Research Database (January 2010-December 2017). Adults were included if they had a prescription claim for acute migraine treatments (AMT) or preventive migraine treatments (PMT) in the index period (January 2011-December 2014). The AMT cohort was categorized as persistent, cycled, or added-on subgroups; the PMT cohort was categorized PMT-persistent, switched without gaps, or cycled with gaps. Migraine-specific annual direct costs (2017 US$) across AMT and PMT cohort subgroups were summarized at baseline through 3 years from index (follow-up).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the index period, 20,778 and 42,259 patients initiated an AMT and a PMT, respectively. At the 3-year follow-up, migraine-specific direct costs were lower in the persistent subgroup relative to the non-persistent subgroups in both AMT (mean [SD]: $789 [$1741] vs. $2847 [$8149] in the added-on subgroup and $862 [$5426] for the cycled subgroup) and PMT cohorts (mean [SD]: $1817 [$5892] in the persistent subgroup vs. $4257 [$11,392] in the switched without gaps subgroup and $3269 [$18,540] in the cycled with gaps subgroup). Acute medication overuse was lower in the persistent subgroup (1025/6504 [27.2%]) vs. non-persistent subgroups (11,236/58,863 [32.2%] in cycled with gaps subgroup and 1431/6504 [39.4%] in the switched without gaps subgroup). Most patients used multiple acute (19,717/20,778 [94.9%]) or preventive (38,494/42,259 [91.1%]) pharmacological therapies over 3 years following treatment initiation. Gaps in preventive therapy were common; an average gap ranged from 85 to 211 days (~3-7 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Migraine-specific annual healthcare costs and acute migraine medication overuse remained lowest among patients with persistent AMT and PMT versus non-persistent treatment. Study findings are limited to the US population. Future studies should compare costs and associated outcomes between newer preventive migraine medications in patients with migraine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Headache\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"796-809\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Headache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14741\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述美国偏头痛患者在开始接受标准急性和预防性偏头痛药物治疗后三年内的治疗模式和直接医疗费用:描述美国偏头痛患者在开始接受标准急性和预防性偏头痛药物治疗后三年内的治疗模式和直接医疗成本:有关偏头痛长期(超过 1 年)治疗模式及相关结果的数据有限:这是一项回顾性、观察性队列研究,使用的是来自 IBM® MarketScan® 研究数据库(2010 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月)的美国索赔数据。在索引期(2011 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月)内,如果成人有急性偏头痛治疗(AMT)或预防性偏头痛治疗(PMT)的处方索赔,则被纳入研究范围。急性偏头痛治疗组群分为持续治疗、循环治疗或附加治疗亚组;预防性偏头痛治疗组群分为持续治疗、无间隙切换治疗或有间隙循环治疗亚组。从基线到发病后 3 年(随访),汇总了 AMT 和 PMT 组群亚群的偏头痛特定年度直接成本(2017 年美元):在指数期间,分别有20778名和42259名患者开始接受AMT和PMT治疗。在 3 年的随访中,持续性偏头痛亚组的偏头痛特定直接费用均低于非持续性亚组(平均值[标度]:789 美元[1741 美元] vs. PMT:2847 美元[8149 美元])。持续亚组的平均值[标度]:1817 [5892 美元],无间隙换药亚组的平均值:4257 [11,392 美元],有间隙换药亚组的平均值:3269 [18,540 美元])。急性药物过度使用率在持续亚组(1025/6504 [27.2%])低于非持续亚组(有间隙循环亚组为 11,236/58,863 [32.2%],无间隙换药亚组为 1431/6504 [39.4%])。大多数患者在开始治疗后的 3 年中使用了多种急性疗法(19717/20778 [94.9%])或预防疗法(38494/42259 [91.1%])。预防性治疗的间隙很常见;平均间隙从 85 天到 211 天不等(约 3-7 个月):结论:与非持续治疗相比,持续AMT和PMT患者的偏头痛特定年度医疗费用和急性偏头痛药物过度使用率仍然最低。研究结果仅限于美国人群。未来的研究应比较偏头痛患者使用新型偏头痛预防药物的成本和相关结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A 3-year follow-up study of outcomes associated with patterns of traditional acute and preventive migraine treatment: An administrative claims-based cohort study in the United States.

Objective: To describe treatment patterns and direct healthcare costs over 3 years following initiation of standard of care acute and preventive migraine medications in patients with migraine in the United States.

Background: There are limited data on long-term (>1 year) migraine treatments patterns and associated outcomes.

Methods: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study using US claims data from the IBM® MarketScan® Research Database (January 2010-December 2017). Adults were included if they had a prescription claim for acute migraine treatments (AMT) or preventive migraine treatments (PMT) in the index period (January 2011-December 2014). The AMT cohort was categorized as persistent, cycled, or added-on subgroups; the PMT cohort was categorized PMT-persistent, switched without gaps, or cycled with gaps. Migraine-specific annual direct costs (2017 US$) across AMT and PMT cohort subgroups were summarized at baseline through 3 years from index (follow-up).

Results: During the index period, 20,778 and 42,259 patients initiated an AMT and a PMT, respectively. At the 3-year follow-up, migraine-specific direct costs were lower in the persistent subgroup relative to the non-persistent subgroups in both AMT (mean [SD]: $789 [$1741] vs. $2847 [$8149] in the added-on subgroup and $862 [$5426] for the cycled subgroup) and PMT cohorts (mean [SD]: $1817 [$5892] in the persistent subgroup vs. $4257 [$11,392] in the switched without gaps subgroup and $3269 [$18,540] in the cycled with gaps subgroup). Acute medication overuse was lower in the persistent subgroup (1025/6504 [27.2%]) vs. non-persistent subgroups (11,236/58,863 [32.2%] in cycled with gaps subgroup and 1431/6504 [39.4%] in the switched without gaps subgroup). Most patients used multiple acute (19,717/20,778 [94.9%]) or preventive (38,494/42,259 [91.1%]) pharmacological therapies over 3 years following treatment initiation. Gaps in preventive therapy were common; an average gap ranged from 85 to 211 days (~3-7 months).

Conclusion: Migraine-specific annual healthcare costs and acute migraine medication overuse remained lowest among patients with persistent AMT and PMT versus non-persistent treatment. Study findings are limited to the US population. Future studies should compare costs and associated outcomes between newer preventive migraine medications in patients with migraine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信