Yu Liu , Duantengchuan Li , Kaili Wang , Zhuoran Xiong , Fobo Shi , Jian Wang , Bing Li , Bo Hang
{"title":"法学硕士擅长结构化产出吗?评估法律硕士结构化产出能力的基准","authors":"Yu Liu , Duantengchuan Li , Kaili Wang , Zhuoran Xiong , Fobo Shi , Jian Wang , Bing Li , Bo Hang","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Existing benchmarks for Large Language Models (LLMs) mostly focus on general or specific domain capabilities, overlooking structured output capabilities. We introduce SoEval, a benchmark for assessing LLMs’ ability to generate structured outputs like JSON, XML, and lists. SoEval contains 3.7K entries in Chinese and English, covering 13 types of structured output tasks across 20 subjects. In experiments, we found that while current mainstream LLMs have deficiencies in structured output, GPT-4 outperforms them in this aspect. GPT-4 achieved an average score of 0.4 on SoEval, representing a 24% enhancement over the next best-performing model. At the same time, the performance of current mainstream models on English tasks is also better than on Chinese tasks. We also report the performance of mainstream large models on different structured output types and task subjects. The benchmark construction code and SoEval dataset are open-sourced at <span>https://github.com/MoranCoder95/SoEval</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are LLMs good at structured outputs? A benchmark for evaluating structured output capabilities in LLMs\",\"authors\":\"Yu Liu , Duantengchuan Li , Kaili Wang , Zhuoran Xiong , Fobo Shi , Jian Wang , Bing Li , Bo Hang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Existing benchmarks for Large Language Models (LLMs) mostly focus on general or specific domain capabilities, overlooking structured output capabilities. We introduce SoEval, a benchmark for assessing LLMs’ ability to generate structured outputs like JSON, XML, and lists. SoEval contains 3.7K entries in Chinese and English, covering 13 types of structured output tasks across 20 subjects. In experiments, we found that while current mainstream LLMs have deficiencies in structured output, GPT-4 outperforms them in this aspect. GPT-4 achieved an average score of 0.4 on SoEval, representing a 24% enhancement over the next best-performing model. At the same time, the performance of current mainstream models on English tasks is also better than on Chinese tasks. We also report the performance of mainstream large models on different structured output types and task subjects. The benchmark construction code and SoEval dataset are open-sourced at <span>https://github.com/MoranCoder95/SoEval</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Processing & Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Processing & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457324001687\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457324001687","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are LLMs good at structured outputs? A benchmark for evaluating structured output capabilities in LLMs
Existing benchmarks for Large Language Models (LLMs) mostly focus on general or specific domain capabilities, overlooking structured output capabilities. We introduce SoEval, a benchmark for assessing LLMs’ ability to generate structured outputs like JSON, XML, and lists. SoEval contains 3.7K entries in Chinese and English, covering 13 types of structured output tasks across 20 subjects. In experiments, we found that while current mainstream LLMs have deficiencies in structured output, GPT-4 outperforms them in this aspect. GPT-4 achieved an average score of 0.4 on SoEval, representing a 24% enhancement over the next best-performing model. At the same time, the performance of current mainstream models on English tasks is also better than on Chinese tasks. We also report the performance of mainstream large models on different structured output types and task subjects. The benchmark construction code and SoEval dataset are open-sourced at https://github.com/MoranCoder95/SoEval.
期刊介绍:
Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing.
We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.