与拔管后重症成人患者口服准备相关的因素:前瞻性观察研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nursing in Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1111/nicc.13109
Shimmaa Mohamed Elsayed, Sameh Eltaybani, Maysa Abdalla Elbiaa
{"title":"与拔管后重症成人患者口服准备相关的因素:前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Shimmaa Mohamed Elsayed, Sameh Eltaybani, Maysa Abdalla Elbiaa","doi":"10.1111/nicc.13109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-extubation dysphagia (PED) is a common post-extubation complication that may lead to serious problems, such as malnutrition and longer hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stays.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore factors associated with the readiness for oral intake in post-extubated critically ill adult patients.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This prospective observational study involved 125 extubated patients. Readiness for oral intake was assessed using the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS), and regression analysis was used to determine its predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the participants was 40.0 years, and 51.2% were female. The median GUSS score was 12.0 (possible range, 0-20), and 35.2% of the studied patients had severe dysphagia (scored 0-9). Bivariate regression analysis showed that older age, male, higher APACHE II score, body mass index (BMI) ≥30, smoking history, longer ICU stay, muscle relaxants use, large-bore endotracheal and orogastric tubes and frequent intubation attempts were associated with lower GUSS score (p-value <.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that age, BMI and smoking history predicted 37.2% of the variability in the GUSS score (F = 23.865, p-value <.001). Adding the ICU length of stay, muscle relaxants use, size of the endotracheal tube, size of the orogastric tube and frequency of intubation attempts to the regression model raised the predictability to 86.0% (F = 88.809, p-value <.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More than one-third of extubated patients have severe PED with a high risk of aspiration. Several modifiable factors, such as muscle relaxant use and endotracheal and orogastric tube size, predict post-extubation readiness for oral intake.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Using endotracheal and orogastric tubes of appropriate sizes, careful assessment of patients with a high risk for difficult intubation, and minimal use of muscle relaxants may help increase patients' readiness for post-extubation oral intake.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"1555-1563"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with the readiness for oral intake in post-extubated critically ill adult patients: A prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Shimmaa Mohamed Elsayed, Sameh Eltaybani, Maysa Abdalla Elbiaa\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nicc.13109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-extubation dysphagia (PED) is a common post-extubation complication that may lead to serious problems, such as malnutrition and longer hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stays.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore factors associated with the readiness for oral intake in post-extubated critically ill adult patients.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This prospective observational study involved 125 extubated patients. Readiness for oral intake was assessed using the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS), and regression analysis was used to determine its predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the participants was 40.0 years, and 51.2% were female. The median GUSS score was 12.0 (possible range, 0-20), and 35.2% of the studied patients had severe dysphagia (scored 0-9). Bivariate regression analysis showed that older age, male, higher APACHE II score, body mass index (BMI) ≥30, smoking history, longer ICU stay, muscle relaxants use, large-bore endotracheal and orogastric tubes and frequent intubation attempts were associated with lower GUSS score (p-value <.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that age, BMI and smoking history predicted 37.2% of the variability in the GUSS score (F = 23.865, p-value <.001). Adding the ICU length of stay, muscle relaxants use, size of the endotracheal tube, size of the orogastric tube and frequency of intubation attempts to the regression model raised the predictability to 86.0% (F = 88.809, p-value <.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More than one-third of extubated patients have severe PED with a high risk of aspiration. Several modifiable factors, such as muscle relaxant use and endotracheal and orogastric tube size, predict post-extubation readiness for oral intake.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Using endotracheal and orogastric tubes of appropriate sizes, careful assessment of patients with a high risk for difficult intubation, and minimal use of muscle relaxants may help increase patients' readiness for post-extubation oral intake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1555-1563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13109\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13109","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:拔管后吞咽困难(PED)是一种常见的拔管后并发症,可能导致营养不良、住院时间延长和重症监护室(ICU)住院时间延长等严重问题:这项前瞻性观察研究涉及 125 名拔管患者。采用 Gugging 吞咽筛查(GUSS)评估口腔摄入准备情况,并采用回归分析确定其预测因素:参与者的年龄中位数为 40.0 岁,51.2% 为女性。GUSS评分中位数为12.0分(可能范围为0-20分),35.2%的患者有严重吞咽困难(评分为0-9分)。双变量回归分析显示,年龄较大、男性、APACHE II评分较高、体重指数(BMI)≥30、吸烟史、ICU住院时间较长、使用肌肉松弛剂、大口径气管插管和口胃管以及频繁尝试插管与较低的GUSS评分有关(P值 结论:GUSS评分越低,说明患者的吞咽困难越严重:超过三分之一的拔管患者有严重的 PED,吸入风险很高。一些可改变的因素,如肌肉松弛剂的使用、气管插管和口胃管的大小,可预测拔管后的口服准备情况:使用大小合适的气管插管和口胃管、仔细评估插管困难的高风险患者以及尽量少使用肌肉松弛剂可能有助于提高患者插管后口服的准备程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors associated with the readiness for oral intake in post-extubated critically ill adult patients: A prospective observational study.

Background: Post-extubation dysphagia (PED) is a common post-extubation complication that may lead to serious problems, such as malnutrition and longer hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stays.

Aim: To explore factors associated with the readiness for oral intake in post-extubated critically ill adult patients.

Study design: This prospective observational study involved 125 extubated patients. Readiness for oral intake was assessed using the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS), and regression analysis was used to determine its predictors.

Results: The median age of the participants was 40.0 years, and 51.2% were female. The median GUSS score was 12.0 (possible range, 0-20), and 35.2% of the studied patients had severe dysphagia (scored 0-9). Bivariate regression analysis showed that older age, male, higher APACHE II score, body mass index (BMI) ≥30, smoking history, longer ICU stay, muscle relaxants use, large-bore endotracheal and orogastric tubes and frequent intubation attempts were associated with lower GUSS score (p-value <.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that age, BMI and smoking history predicted 37.2% of the variability in the GUSS score (F = 23.865, p-value <.001). Adding the ICU length of stay, muscle relaxants use, size of the endotracheal tube, size of the orogastric tube and frequency of intubation attempts to the regression model raised the predictability to 86.0% (F = 88.809, p-value <.001).

Conclusions: More than one-third of extubated patients have severe PED with a high risk of aspiration. Several modifiable factors, such as muscle relaxant use and endotracheal and orogastric tube size, predict post-extubation readiness for oral intake.

Relevance to clinical practice: Using endotracheal and orogastric tubes of appropriate sizes, careful assessment of patients with a high risk for difficult intubation, and minimal use of muscle relaxants may help increase patients' readiness for post-extubation oral intake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信