盲肠浆液作为盲肠结扎和穿刺的替代模型,用于研究败血症诱发的心血管功能障碍。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
SHOCK Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002412
Gabrielle Delfrate, Lucas Braga Albino, Jamil Assreuy, Daniel Fernandes
{"title":"盲肠浆液作为盲肠结扎和穿刺的替代模型,用于研究败血症诱发的心血管功能障碍。","authors":"Gabrielle Delfrate, Lucas Braga Albino, Jamil Assreuy, Daniel Fernandes","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Sepsis is a life-threatening condition widely studied by animal models. Cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) is still regarded as the gold standard model for sepsis. However, CLP has limitations due to its invasiveness and variability. Cecal slurry (CS) model is a nonsurgical and thus less invasive alternative. However, the lack of standardization of the CS model in the literature limits its practical application. Additionally, it is not well studied whether CS model reproduces septic cardiovascular dysfunction in rats, which is a crucial issue in septic patients. Thus, this study aimed to standardize the CS model in Wistar rats and evaluate sepsis-induced cardiovascular dysfunction compared to CLP. Our results showed that CS model induced important features of sepsis cardiovascular dysfunction 24 h after its onset, such as hypotension, tachycardia, and decreased contractile response to vasoconstrictors both in vivo and ex vivo as well changes in renal blood flow. Increases in blood lactate, AST, ALT, creatinine, and urea indicated organ dysfunction. CS model also induced increased production of nitric oxide metabolites and bacterial spread to tissues. CS model causes less animal suffering, it is a nonsurgical model, and, more importantly, it replicates the cardiovascular dysfunction induced by sepsis with better homogeneity than CLP. Therefore, CS model serves as an alternative and possibly as a better model for sepsis research.</p>","PeriodicalId":21667,"journal":{"name":"SHOCK","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CECAL SLURRY AS AN ALTERNATIVE MODEL TO CECAL LIGATION AND PUNCTURE FOR THE STUDY OF SEPSIS-INDUCED CARDIOVASCULAR DYSFUNCTION.\",\"authors\":\"Gabrielle Delfrate, Lucas Braga Albino, Jamil Assreuy, Daniel Fernandes\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Sepsis is a life-threatening condition widely studied by animal models. Cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) is still regarded as the gold standard model for sepsis. However, CLP has limitations due to its invasiveness and variability. Cecal slurry (CS) model is a nonsurgical and thus less invasive alternative. However, the lack of standardization of the CS model in the literature limits its practical application. Additionally, it is not well studied whether CS model reproduces septic cardiovascular dysfunction in rats, which is a crucial issue in septic patients. Thus, this study aimed to standardize the CS model in Wistar rats and evaluate sepsis-induced cardiovascular dysfunction compared to CLP. Our results showed that CS model induced important features of sepsis cardiovascular dysfunction 24 h after its onset, such as hypotension, tachycardia, and decreased contractile response to vasoconstrictors both in vivo and ex vivo as well changes in renal blood flow. Increases in blood lactate, AST, ALT, creatinine, and urea indicated organ dysfunction. CS model also induced increased production of nitric oxide metabolites and bacterial spread to tissues. CS model causes less animal suffering, it is a nonsurgical model, and, more importantly, it replicates the cardiovascular dysfunction induced by sepsis with better homogeneity than CLP. Therefore, CS model serves as an alternative and possibly as a better model for sepsis research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SHOCK\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SHOCK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002412\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHOCK","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002412","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:败血症是一种危及生命的疾病,通过动物模型进行广泛研究。盲肠结扎和穿孔(CLP)仍被视为败血症的金标准模型。然而,CLP 因其侵入性和可变性而存在局限性。盲肠浆液注射(CS)模型是一种非手术疗法,因此创伤较小。然而,文献中缺乏对 CS 模型的标准化描述,这限制了它的实际应用。此外,CS 模型是否能重现大鼠脓毒症心血管功能障碍也没有得到很好的研究,而这正是脓毒症患者的一个关键问题。因此,本研究旨在标准化 Wistar 大鼠的 CS 模型,并与 CLP 相比评估脓毒症诱发的心血管功能障碍。我们的研究结果表明,CS 模型可在脓毒症发生 24 小时后诱发脓毒症心血管功能障碍的重要特征,如低血压、心动过速、体内外对血管收缩剂的收缩反应减弱以及肾血流量的变化。血乳酸、谷草转氨酶、谷丙转氨酶、肌酐和尿素的升高表明器官功能障碍。CS 模型还能诱导一氧化氮代谢产物的产生和细菌向组织的扩散。CS 模型减少了动物的痛苦,是一种非手术模型,更重要的是,它复制了败血症引起的心血管功能障碍,其均匀性优于 CLP。因此,CS 模型可作为败血症研究的替代模型,甚至可能是更好的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CECAL SLURRY AS AN ALTERNATIVE MODEL TO CECAL LIGATION AND PUNCTURE FOR THE STUDY OF SEPSIS-INDUCED CARDIOVASCULAR DYSFUNCTION.

Abstract: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition widely studied by animal models. Cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) is still regarded as the gold standard model for sepsis. However, CLP has limitations due to its invasiveness and variability. Cecal slurry (CS) model is a nonsurgical and thus less invasive alternative. However, the lack of standardization of the CS model in the literature limits its practical application. Additionally, it is not well studied whether CS model reproduces septic cardiovascular dysfunction in rats, which is a crucial issue in septic patients. Thus, this study aimed to standardize the CS model in Wistar rats and evaluate sepsis-induced cardiovascular dysfunction compared to CLP. Our results showed that CS model induced important features of sepsis cardiovascular dysfunction 24 h after its onset, such as hypotension, tachycardia, and decreased contractile response to vasoconstrictors both in vivo and ex vivo as well changes in renal blood flow. Increases in blood lactate, AST, ALT, creatinine, and urea indicated organ dysfunction. CS model also induced increased production of nitric oxide metabolites and bacterial spread to tissues. CS model causes less animal suffering, it is a nonsurgical model, and, more importantly, it replicates the cardiovascular dysfunction induced by sepsis with better homogeneity than CLP. Therefore, CS model serves as an alternative and possibly as a better model for sepsis research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SHOCK
SHOCK 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
199
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: SHOCK®: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches includes studies of novel therapeutic approaches, such as immunomodulation, gene therapy, nutrition, and others. The mission of the Journal is to foster and promote multidisciplinary studies, both experimental and clinical in nature, that critically examine the etiology, mechanisms and novel therapeutics of shock-related pathophysiological conditions. Its purpose is to excel as a vehicle for timely publication in the areas of basic and clinical studies of shock, trauma, sepsis, inflammation, ischemia, and related pathobiological states, with particular emphasis on the biologic mechanisms that determine the response to such injury. Making such information available will ultimately facilitate improved care of the traumatized or septic individual.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信