瞬态弹性成像对肥胖症青少年肝软化症的诊断准确性。

IF 3 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Journal of the Endocrine Society Pub Date : 2024-06-11 eCollection Date: 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1210/jendso/bvae110
Emir Tas, Divya Sundararajan, Jaclyn S Lo, Nazeen Morelli, Yesenia Garcia-Reyes, Meredith A Ware, Haseeb Rahat, Xiawei Ou, Xiaoxu Na, Shikha Sundaram, Cameron Severn, Laura L Pyle, Elisabet Børsheim, Mary Ellen Vajravelu, Radhika Muzumdar, Jonathan A Dranoff, Melanie G Cree
{"title":"瞬态弹性成像对肥胖症青少年肝软化症的诊断准确性。","authors":"Emir Tas, Divya Sundararajan, Jaclyn S Lo, Nazeen Morelli, Yesenia Garcia-Reyes, Meredith A Ware, Haseeb Rahat, Xiawei Ou, Xiaoxu Na, Shikha Sundaram, Cameron Severn, Laura L Pyle, Elisabet Børsheim, Mary Ellen Vajravelu, Radhika Muzumdar, Jonathan A Dranoff, Melanie G Cree","doi":"10.1210/jendso/bvae110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Steatotic liver disease is common but overlooked in childhood obesity; diagnostic methods are invasive or expensive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in adolescents with obesity and high risk for hepatosteatosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline data in 3 clinical trials enrolling adolescents with obesity were included (NCT03919929, NCT03717935, NCT04342390). Liver fat was assessed using MRI fat fraction and VCTE-based controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). Hepatosteatosis was defined as MRI fat fraction ≥5.0%. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) for CAP against MRI was calculated, and optimal CAP using the Youden index for hepatosteatosis diagnosis was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 82 adolescents (age 15.6 ± 1.4 years, body mass index 36.5 ± 5.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 81% female) were included. Fifty youth had hepatosteatosis by MRI (fat fraction 9.3% ; 95% CI 6.7, 14.0), and 32 participants did not have hepatosteatosis (fat fraction 3.1%; 95% CI 2.2, 3.9; <i>P</i> < .001). The hepatosteatosis group had higher mean CAP compared with no hepatosteatosis (293 dB/m; 95% CI 267, 325 vs 267 dB/m; 95% CI 248, 282; <i>P</i> = .0120). A CAP of 281 dB/m had the highest sensitivity (60%) and specificity (74%) with AUROC of 0.649 (95% CI 0.51-0.79; <i>P</i> = .04) in the entire cohort. In a subset of participants with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a CAP of 306 dB/m had the highest sensitivity (78%) and specificity (52%) and AUROC of 0.678 (95% CI 0.45-0.90; <i>P</i> = .108).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CAP of 281 dB/m has modest diagnostic performance for hepatosteatosis compared with MRI in youth with significant obesity. A higher CAP in youth with PCOS suggests that comorbidities might affect optimal CAP in hepatosteatosis diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":17334,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","volume":"8 7","pages":"bvae110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11185182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of Transient Elastography in Hepatosteatosis in Youth With Obesity.\",\"authors\":\"Emir Tas, Divya Sundararajan, Jaclyn S Lo, Nazeen Morelli, Yesenia Garcia-Reyes, Meredith A Ware, Haseeb Rahat, Xiawei Ou, Xiaoxu Na, Shikha Sundaram, Cameron Severn, Laura L Pyle, Elisabet Børsheim, Mary Ellen Vajravelu, Radhika Muzumdar, Jonathan A Dranoff, Melanie G Cree\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/jendso/bvae110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Steatotic liver disease is common but overlooked in childhood obesity; diagnostic methods are invasive or expensive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in adolescents with obesity and high risk for hepatosteatosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline data in 3 clinical trials enrolling adolescents with obesity were included (NCT03919929, NCT03717935, NCT04342390). Liver fat was assessed using MRI fat fraction and VCTE-based controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). Hepatosteatosis was defined as MRI fat fraction ≥5.0%. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) for CAP against MRI was calculated, and optimal CAP using the Youden index for hepatosteatosis diagnosis was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 82 adolescents (age 15.6 ± 1.4 years, body mass index 36.5 ± 5.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 81% female) were included. Fifty youth had hepatosteatosis by MRI (fat fraction 9.3% ; 95% CI 6.7, 14.0), and 32 participants did not have hepatosteatosis (fat fraction 3.1%; 95% CI 2.2, 3.9; <i>P</i> < .001). The hepatosteatosis group had higher mean CAP compared with no hepatosteatosis (293 dB/m; 95% CI 267, 325 vs 267 dB/m; 95% CI 248, 282; <i>P</i> = .0120). A CAP of 281 dB/m had the highest sensitivity (60%) and specificity (74%) with AUROC of 0.649 (95% CI 0.51-0.79; <i>P</i> = .04) in the entire cohort. In a subset of participants with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a CAP of 306 dB/m had the highest sensitivity (78%) and specificity (52%) and AUROC of 0.678 (95% CI 0.45-0.90; <i>P</i> = .108).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CAP of 281 dB/m has modest diagnostic performance for hepatosteatosis compared with MRI in youth with significant obesity. A higher CAP in youth with PCOS suggests that comorbidities might affect optimal CAP in hepatosteatosis diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Endocrine Society\",\"volume\":\"8 7\",\"pages\":\"bvae110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11185182/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Endocrine Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvae110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvae110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肥胖性肝病在儿童肥胖症中很常见,但却被忽视;诊断方法具有侵入性或费用昂贵:我们试图确定振动控制瞬态弹性成像(VCTE)与磁共振成像(MRI)相比,对肥胖和肝硬变高风险青少年的诊断准确性:方法:纳入了 3 项肥胖症青少年临床试验的基线数据(NCT03919929、NCT03717935、NCT04342390)。肝脏脂肪通过核磁共振成像脂肪分数和基于 VCTE 的受控衰减参数 (CAP) 进行评估。肝脂肪变性的定义是 MRI 脂肪分数≥5.0%。计算了 CAP 与 MRI 的接收操作特征曲线下面积 (AUROC),并确定了使用尤登指数诊断肝软化症的最佳 CAP:纳入了 82 名青少年(年龄为 15.6 ± 1.4 岁,体重指数为 36.5 ± 5.9 kg/m2,81% 为女性)的数据。50名青少年通过核磁共振检查发现患有肝脂肪变性(脂肪率为9.3%;95% CI为6.7, 14.0),32名参与者没有肝脂肪变性(脂肪率为3.1%;95% CI为2.2, 3.9;P < .001)。肝脂肪变性组的平均 CAP 值高于无肝脂肪变性组(293 dB/m; 95% CI 267, 325 vs 267 dB/m; 95% CI 248, 282; P = .0120)。在整个队列中,281 dB/m 的 CAP 具有最高的灵敏度(60%)和特异性(74%),AUROC 为 0.649 (95% CI 0.51-0.79; P = .04)。在患有多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)的参与者子集中,306 dB/m 的 CAP 具有最高的灵敏度(78%)和特异度(52%),AUROC 为 0.678 (95% CI 0.45-0.90; P = .108):结论:与 MRI 相比,281 dB/m 的 CAP 对明显肥胖的青少年肝脂肪变性的诊断效果一般。多囊卵巢综合征患者的 CAP 值较高,这表明合并症可能会影响肝软化症诊断的最佳 CAP 值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Accuracy of Transient Elastography in Hepatosteatosis in Youth With Obesity.

Context: Steatotic liver disease is common but overlooked in childhood obesity; diagnostic methods are invasive or expensive.

Objective: We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in adolescents with obesity and high risk for hepatosteatosis.

Methods: Baseline data in 3 clinical trials enrolling adolescents with obesity were included (NCT03919929, NCT03717935, NCT04342390). Liver fat was assessed using MRI fat fraction and VCTE-based controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). Hepatosteatosis was defined as MRI fat fraction ≥5.0%. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) for CAP against MRI was calculated, and optimal CAP using the Youden index for hepatosteatosis diagnosis was determined.

Results: Data from 82 adolescents (age 15.6 ± 1.4 years, body mass index 36.5 ± 5.9 kg/m2, 81% female) were included. Fifty youth had hepatosteatosis by MRI (fat fraction 9.3% ; 95% CI 6.7, 14.0), and 32 participants did not have hepatosteatosis (fat fraction 3.1%; 95% CI 2.2, 3.9; P < .001). The hepatosteatosis group had higher mean CAP compared with no hepatosteatosis (293 dB/m; 95% CI 267, 325 vs 267 dB/m; 95% CI 248, 282; P = .0120). A CAP of 281 dB/m had the highest sensitivity (60%) and specificity (74%) with AUROC of 0.649 (95% CI 0.51-0.79; P = .04) in the entire cohort. In a subset of participants with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a CAP of 306 dB/m had the highest sensitivity (78%) and specificity (52%) and AUROC of 0.678 (95% CI 0.45-0.90; P = .108).

Conclusion: CAP of 281 dB/m has modest diagnostic performance for hepatosteatosis compared with MRI in youth with significant obesity. A higher CAP in youth with PCOS suggests that comorbidities might affect optimal CAP in hepatosteatosis diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Journal of the Endocrine Society Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信