HCC 治疗反应生物标志物指数的开发与验证。

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatology Communications Pub Date : 2024-06-19 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/HC9.0000000000000466
Jeff Liang, Po-Yi Li, Joshua Norman, Marie Lauzon, Yee Hui Yeo, Hirsh Trivedi, Walid S Ayoub, Alexander Kuo, Marc L Friedman, Kamya Sankar, Jun Gong, Arsen Osipov, Andrew Hendifar, Tsuyoshi Todo, Irene Kim, Georgios Voidonikolas, Todd V Brennan, Steven A Wisel, Justin Steggarda, Kambiz Kosari, Rola Saouaf, Nicholas Nissen, Francis Yao, Neil Mehta, Ju Dong Yang
{"title":"HCC 治疗反应生物标志物指数的开发与验证。","authors":"Jeff Liang, Po-Yi Li, Joshua Norman, Marie Lauzon, Yee Hui Yeo, Hirsh Trivedi, Walid S Ayoub, Alexander Kuo, Marc L Friedman, Kamya Sankar, Jun Gong, Arsen Osipov, Andrew Hendifar, Tsuyoshi Todo, Irene Kim, Georgios Voidonikolas, Todd V Brennan, Steven A Wisel, Justin Steggarda, Kambiz Kosari, Rola Saouaf, Nicholas Nissen, Francis Yao, Neil Mehta, Ju Dong Yang","doi":"10.1097/HC9.0000000000000466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serum AFP-L3%, AFP, and DCP are useful biomarkers for HCC detection, but their utility in assessing treatment response remains unknown. We aim to evaluate the accuracy of a biomarker model in the detection of posttreatment viable tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For model derivation, recipients with HCC undergoing liver transplant from 2018 to 2022 who had biomarkers collected within 3 months before transplant were included. We developed a generalized linear model for detecting posttreatment viable tumors with the 3 biomarkers as covariates, which we termed the \"LAD Score.\" An independent cohort of 117 patients with HCC was used for external validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 205 recipients of transplant, 70.2% had evidence of viable tumor on explant. The median LAD score was higher among patients with viable versus nonviable tumors (1.06 vs. 0.465, p < 0.001). The LAD score had a sensitivity of 55.6% and a specificity of 85.1% at the cutoff of 0.927, which was more accurate than imaging for detecting posttreatment viable tumors (AUROC 0.736 vs. 0.643, respectively; p = 0.045). The superior performance of the LAD score over imaging is primarily driven by its greater accuracy in detecting tumors <2 cm in diameter (AUROC of the LAD score 0.721 vs. imaging 0.595, p = 0.02). In the validation data set, the LAD score had an AUROC of 0.832 (95% CI: 0.753, 0.911) with a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 89.4% at the cutoff of 0.927.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest the utility of LAD score in treatment response assessment after locoregional therapy for HCC, particularly in detecting small tumors. A larger prospective study is in progress to validate its accuracy and evaluate its performance in recurrence monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":12978,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Communications","volume":"8 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11186807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a biomarker index for HCC treatment response.\",\"authors\":\"Jeff Liang, Po-Yi Li, Joshua Norman, Marie Lauzon, Yee Hui Yeo, Hirsh Trivedi, Walid S Ayoub, Alexander Kuo, Marc L Friedman, Kamya Sankar, Jun Gong, Arsen Osipov, Andrew Hendifar, Tsuyoshi Todo, Irene Kim, Georgios Voidonikolas, Todd V Brennan, Steven A Wisel, Justin Steggarda, Kambiz Kosari, Rola Saouaf, Nicholas Nissen, Francis Yao, Neil Mehta, Ju Dong Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HC9.0000000000000466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serum AFP-L3%, AFP, and DCP are useful biomarkers for HCC detection, but their utility in assessing treatment response remains unknown. We aim to evaluate the accuracy of a biomarker model in the detection of posttreatment viable tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For model derivation, recipients with HCC undergoing liver transplant from 2018 to 2022 who had biomarkers collected within 3 months before transplant were included. We developed a generalized linear model for detecting posttreatment viable tumors with the 3 biomarkers as covariates, which we termed the \\\"LAD Score.\\\" An independent cohort of 117 patients with HCC was used for external validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 205 recipients of transplant, 70.2% had evidence of viable tumor on explant. The median LAD score was higher among patients with viable versus nonviable tumors (1.06 vs. 0.465, p < 0.001). The LAD score had a sensitivity of 55.6% and a specificity of 85.1% at the cutoff of 0.927, which was more accurate than imaging for detecting posttreatment viable tumors (AUROC 0.736 vs. 0.643, respectively; p = 0.045). The superior performance of the LAD score over imaging is primarily driven by its greater accuracy in detecting tumors <2 cm in diameter (AUROC of the LAD score 0.721 vs. imaging 0.595, p = 0.02). In the validation data set, the LAD score had an AUROC of 0.832 (95% CI: 0.753, 0.911) with a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 89.4% at the cutoff of 0.927.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest the utility of LAD score in treatment response assessment after locoregional therapy for HCC, particularly in detecting small tumors. A larger prospective study is in progress to validate its accuracy and evaluate its performance in recurrence monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatology Communications\",\"volume\":\"8 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11186807/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatology Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000466\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000466","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血清 AFP-L3%、AFP 和 DCP 是检测 HCC 的有用生物标志物,但它们在评估治疗反应中的作用仍不清楚。我们旨在评估生物标志物模型在检测治疗后存活肿瘤方面的准确性:为了推导模型,我们纳入了2018年至2022年接受肝移植的HCC受者,他们在移植前3个月内采集了生物标志物。我们建立了一个检测治疗后存活肿瘤的广义线性模型,将 3 个生物标志物作为协变量,我们称之为 "LAD 评分"。一个由117名HCC患者组成的独立队列用于外部验证:结果:在 205 名接受移植的患者中,70.2% 的患者在移植时有存活肿瘤的证据。存活肿瘤患者的 LAD 评分中值高于未存活肿瘤患者(1.06 vs. 0.465,p < 0.001)。在 0.927 临界值时,LAD 评分的灵敏度为 55.6%,特异度为 85.1%,在检测治疗后存活肿瘤方面比造影更准确(AUROC 分别为 0.736 vs. 0.643;p = 0.045)。LAD 评分优于造影的主要原因是它在检测肿瘤方面更准确 结论:我们的研究结果表明,LAD 评分可用于 HCC 局部治疗后的治疗反应评估,尤其是在检测小肿瘤方面。目前正在进行一项更大规模的前瞻性研究,以验证其准确性并评估其在复发监测中的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of a biomarker index for HCC treatment response.

Background: Serum AFP-L3%, AFP, and DCP are useful biomarkers for HCC detection, but their utility in assessing treatment response remains unknown. We aim to evaluate the accuracy of a biomarker model in the detection of posttreatment viable tumors.

Methods: For model derivation, recipients with HCC undergoing liver transplant from 2018 to 2022 who had biomarkers collected within 3 months before transplant were included. We developed a generalized linear model for detecting posttreatment viable tumors with the 3 biomarkers as covariates, which we termed the "LAD Score." An independent cohort of 117 patients with HCC was used for external validation.

Results: Among 205 recipients of transplant, 70.2% had evidence of viable tumor on explant. The median LAD score was higher among patients with viable versus nonviable tumors (1.06 vs. 0.465, p < 0.001). The LAD score had a sensitivity of 55.6% and a specificity of 85.1% at the cutoff of 0.927, which was more accurate than imaging for detecting posttreatment viable tumors (AUROC 0.736 vs. 0.643, respectively; p = 0.045). The superior performance of the LAD score over imaging is primarily driven by its greater accuracy in detecting tumors <2 cm in diameter (AUROC of the LAD score 0.721 vs. imaging 0.595, p = 0.02). In the validation data set, the LAD score had an AUROC of 0.832 (95% CI: 0.753, 0.911) with a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 89.4% at the cutoff of 0.927.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest the utility of LAD score in treatment response assessment after locoregional therapy for HCC, particularly in detecting small tumors. A larger prospective study is in progress to validate its accuracy and evaluate its performance in recurrence monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatology Communications
Hepatology Communications GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology Communications is a peer-reviewed, online-only, open access journal for fast dissemination of high quality basic, translational, and clinical research in hepatology. Hepatology Communications maintains high standard and rigorous peer review. Because of its open access nature, authors retain the copyright to their works, all articles are immediately available and free to read and share, and it is fully compliant with funder and institutional mandates. The journal is committed to fast publication and author satisfaction. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信