异体造血细胞移植后皮肤硬化症治疗反应措施的比较。

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Joseph A Pidala, Lynn Onstad, Emily Baumrin, Paul A Carpenter, Corey Cutler, Sally Arai, Carrie L Kitko, George L Chen, Stephanie J Lee
{"title":"异体造血细胞移植后皮肤硬化症治疗反应措施的比较。","authors":"Joseph A Pidala, Lynn Onstad, Emily Baumrin, Paul A Carpenter, Corey Cutler, Sally Arai, Carrie L Kitko, George L Chen, Stephanie J Lee","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Cutaneous sclerosis, a highly morbid subtype of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), demonstrates limited treatment response under current National Institutes of Health (NIH) response measures. We explored novel sclerosis-specific response measures using Chronic GVHD Consortium data. A training cohort included patients with cutaneous sclerosis from a randomized trial of imatinib vs rituximab and a consortium observational study. The validation cohort was a different consortium observational study. Clinician-reported measures (baseline and baseline to 6-month change) were examined for association with 6-month clinician-reported response. Patient-reported measures (baseline and baseline to 6-month change) were studied for association with 6-month patient-reported response. A total of 347 patients were included (training 183 and validation 164). Although multiple skin and joint measures were associated with clinician-reported response on univariate analysis, patient range of motion (PROM) total score, PROM total score change, and NIH 0 to 3 skin change were retained in the final multivariate model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.83 training and 0.75 validation). Similarly, many patient-reported measures were associated, but final multivariate analysis retained the human activity profile adjusted activity score (AAS), 36 item short form health survey (SF36) vitality change, Lee symptom scale (LSS) skin, and LSS skin change in the model (AUC, 0.86 training and 0.75 validation). We identified which sclerosis measures have the greatest association with 6-month clinician- and patient-reported treatment responses, a previously unstudied area. However, given the observed performance in the validation cohorts, we conclude that further work is needed. Novel response measures may be needed to optimally assess treatment response in cutaneous sclerosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11402177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of treatment response measures in cutaneous sclerosis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph A Pidala, Lynn Onstad, Emily Baumrin, Paul A Carpenter, Corey Cutler, Sally Arai, Carrie L Kitko, George L Chen, Stephanie J Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Cutaneous sclerosis, a highly morbid subtype of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), demonstrates limited treatment response under current National Institutes of Health (NIH) response measures. We explored novel sclerosis-specific response measures using Chronic GVHD Consortium data. A training cohort included patients with cutaneous sclerosis from a randomized trial of imatinib vs rituximab and a consortium observational study. The validation cohort was a different consortium observational study. Clinician-reported measures (baseline and baseline to 6-month change) were examined for association with 6-month clinician-reported response. Patient-reported measures (baseline and baseline to 6-month change) were studied for association with 6-month patient-reported response. A total of 347 patients were included (training 183 and validation 164). Although multiple skin and joint measures were associated with clinician-reported response on univariate analysis, patient range of motion (PROM) total score, PROM total score change, and NIH 0 to 3 skin change were retained in the final multivariate model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.83 training and 0.75 validation). Similarly, many patient-reported measures were associated, but final multivariate analysis retained the human activity profile adjusted activity score (AAS), 36 item short form health survey (SF36) vitality change, Lee symptom scale (LSS) skin, and LSS skin change in the model (AUC, 0.86 training and 0.75 validation). We identified which sclerosis measures have the greatest association with 6-month clinician- and patient-reported treatment responses, a previously unstudied area. However, given the observed performance in the validation cohorts, we conclude that further work is needed. Novel response measures may be needed to optimally assess treatment response in cutaneous sclerosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11402177/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013233\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013233","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

皮肤硬化症是慢性移植物抗宿主疾病(cGVHD)的一种高发病亚型,在目前的美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)反应衡量标准下,皮肤硬化症的治疗反应有限。我们利用慢性 GVHD 联合会的数据探索了新的硬化症特异性反应测量方法。训练队列包括来自伊马替尼与利妥昔单抗随机试验的皮肤硬化症患者,以及一项联盟观察研究。验证队列是一项不同的联盟观察研究。临床医生报告的指标(基线和基线至 6 个月的变化)与 6 个月临床医生报告的反应相关。患者报告的指标(基线和基线到 6 个月的变化)与患者报告的 6 个月反应相关。共纳入 347 名受试者(培训 183 名,验证 164 名)。在单变量分析中,多个皮肤和关节测量指标与临床医生报告的反应相关,但 PROM 总分、PROM 总分变化和 NIH 0-3 皮肤变化保留在最终的多变量模型中(AUC 0.83 培训值,0.75 验证值)。同样,许多患者报告的指标也有关联,但最终的多变量分析在模型中保留了 HAP AAS、SF36 活力变化、LSS 皮肤和 LSS 皮肤变化(AUC 0.86 训练值,0.75 验证值)。我们确定了哪些硬化症测量指标与临床医生和患者报告的 6 个月治疗反应有最大关联,这是一个以前未研究过的领域。然而,鉴于在验证队列中观察到的表现,我们认为还需要进一步的工作。可能需要新的反应测量方法来优化皮肤硬化症的治疗反应评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of treatment response measures in cutaneous sclerosis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Abstract: Cutaneous sclerosis, a highly morbid subtype of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), demonstrates limited treatment response under current National Institutes of Health (NIH) response measures. We explored novel sclerosis-specific response measures using Chronic GVHD Consortium data. A training cohort included patients with cutaneous sclerosis from a randomized trial of imatinib vs rituximab and a consortium observational study. The validation cohort was a different consortium observational study. Clinician-reported measures (baseline and baseline to 6-month change) were examined for association with 6-month clinician-reported response. Patient-reported measures (baseline and baseline to 6-month change) were studied for association with 6-month patient-reported response. A total of 347 patients were included (training 183 and validation 164). Although multiple skin and joint measures were associated with clinician-reported response on univariate analysis, patient range of motion (PROM) total score, PROM total score change, and NIH 0 to 3 skin change were retained in the final multivariate model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.83 training and 0.75 validation). Similarly, many patient-reported measures were associated, but final multivariate analysis retained the human activity profile adjusted activity score (AAS), 36 item short form health survey (SF36) vitality change, Lee symptom scale (LSS) skin, and LSS skin change in the model (AUC, 0.86 training and 0.75 validation). We identified which sclerosis measures have the greatest association with 6-month clinician- and patient-reported treatment responses, a previously unstudied area. However, given the observed performance in the validation cohorts, we conclude that further work is needed. Novel response measures may be needed to optimally assess treatment response in cutaneous sclerosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood advances
Blood advances Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
840
期刊介绍: Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016. Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信