Namasivayam Ambalavanan, C Michael Cotten, Stephen W Erickson, Ravi Mathur, Dara Torgerson, Philip L Ballard
{"title":"自发早产与指示性极度早产的基因组差异","authors":"Namasivayam Ambalavanan, C Michael Cotten, Stephen W Erickson, Ravi Mathur, Dara Torgerson, Philip L Ballard","doi":"10.1055/a-2347-3751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> Extremely preterm infants are at high risk of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Extreme preterm birth (PTB) may result from spontaneous preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes or may be indicated due to preeclampsia, eclampsia, hypertension, or other causes. Our objective was to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and biological pathways associated with spontaneous versus indicated extreme PTB using the neonatal genome.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> We evaluated 523 spontaneous births and 134 indicated births weighing 401 to 1,000 g at birth from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network's Genomics dataset by genome-wide association study (GWAS) and pathway analysis. The TOLSURF cohort was used to replicate the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> In the NRN GWAS, no statistically significant results were found, although the Manhattan plot showed one almost significant peak (rs60854043 on chromosome 14 at <i>p</i> = 1.03E-07) along with many other modest peaks at <i>p</i> = 1-9E-06, for a total of 15 suggestive associations at this locus. In the NRN pathway analysis, multiple pathways were identified, with the most significant being \"GO_mf:go_low_density_lipoprotein_particle_receptor_activity\" at <i>p</i> = 1.14E-06. However, these results could not be replicated in the TOLSURF cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Genomic differences are seen between infants born by spontaneous versus indicated extreme PTB. Due to the limited sample size, there is a need for larger studies.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Genomic differences are seen between infants born by spontaneous versus indicated very PTB.. · Future studies with large sample sizes evaluating extreme PTB are necessary.. · Spontaneous PTB is more common than indicated extreme PTB..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"238-249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11693484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomic Differences between Spontaneous versus Indicated Extreme Preterm Birth.\",\"authors\":\"Namasivayam Ambalavanan, C Michael Cotten, Stephen W Erickson, Ravi Mathur, Dara Torgerson, Philip L Ballard\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2347-3751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> Extremely preterm infants are at high risk of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Extreme preterm birth (PTB) may result from spontaneous preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes or may be indicated due to preeclampsia, eclampsia, hypertension, or other causes. Our objective was to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and biological pathways associated with spontaneous versus indicated extreme PTB using the neonatal genome.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> We evaluated 523 spontaneous births and 134 indicated births weighing 401 to 1,000 g at birth from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network's Genomics dataset by genome-wide association study (GWAS) and pathway analysis. The TOLSURF cohort was used to replicate the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> In the NRN GWAS, no statistically significant results were found, although the Manhattan plot showed one almost significant peak (rs60854043 on chromosome 14 at <i>p</i> = 1.03E-07) along with many other modest peaks at <i>p</i> = 1-9E-06, for a total of 15 suggestive associations at this locus. In the NRN pathway analysis, multiple pathways were identified, with the most significant being \\\"GO_mf:go_low_density_lipoprotein_particle_receptor_activity\\\" at <i>p</i> = 1.14E-06. However, these results could not be replicated in the TOLSURF cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Genomic differences are seen between infants born by spontaneous versus indicated extreme PTB. Due to the limited sample size, there is a need for larger studies.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Genomic differences are seen between infants born by spontaneous versus indicated very PTB.. · Future studies with large sample sizes evaluating extreme PTB are necessary.. · Spontaneous PTB is more common than indicated extreme PTB..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"238-249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11693484/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2347-3751\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2347-3751","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genomic Differences between Spontaneous versus Indicated Extreme Preterm Birth.
Objective: Extremely preterm infants are at high risk of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Extreme preterm birth (PTB) may result from spontaneous preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes or may be indicated due to preeclampsia, eclampsia, hypertension, or other causes. Our objective was to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and biological pathways associated with spontaneous versus indicated extreme PTB using the neonatal genome.
Study design: We evaluated 523 spontaneous births and 134 indicated births weighing 401 to 1,000 g at birth from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network's Genomics dataset by genome-wide association study (GWAS) and pathway analysis. The TOLSURF cohort was used to replicate the results.
Results: In the NRN GWAS, no statistically significant results were found, although the Manhattan plot showed one almost significant peak (rs60854043 on chromosome 14 at p = 1.03E-07) along with many other modest peaks at p = 1-9E-06, for a total of 15 suggestive associations at this locus. In the NRN pathway analysis, multiple pathways were identified, with the most significant being "GO_mf:go_low_density_lipoprotein_particle_receptor_activity" at p = 1.14E-06. However, these results could not be replicated in the TOLSURF cohort.
Conclusion: Genomic differences are seen between infants born by spontaneous versus indicated extreme PTB. Due to the limited sample size, there is a need for larger studies.
Key points: · Genomic differences are seen between infants born by spontaneous versus indicated very PTB.. · Future studies with large sample sizes evaluating extreme PTB are necessary.. · Spontaneous PTB is more common than indicated extreme PTB..
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.