自发早产与指示性极度早产的基因组差异

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1055/a-2347-3751
Namasivayam Ambalavanan, C Michael Cotten, Stephen W Erickson, Ravi Mathur, Dara Torgerson, Philip L Ballard
{"title":"自发早产与指示性极度早产的基因组差异","authors":"Namasivayam Ambalavanan, C Michael Cotten, Stephen W Erickson, Ravi Mathur, Dara Torgerson, Philip L Ballard","doi":"10.1055/a-2347-3751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> Extremely preterm infants are at high risk of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Extreme preterm birth (PTB) may result from spontaneous preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes or may be indicated due to preeclampsia, eclampsia, hypertension, or other causes. Our objective was to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and biological pathways associated with spontaneous versus indicated extreme PTB using the neonatal genome.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> We evaluated 523 spontaneous births and 134 indicated births weighing 401 to 1,000 g at birth from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network's Genomics dataset by genome-wide association study (GWAS) and pathway analysis. The TOLSURF cohort was used to replicate the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> In the NRN GWAS, no statistically significant results were found, although the Manhattan plot showed one almost significant peak (rs60854043 on chromosome 14 at <i>p</i> = 1.03E-07) along with many other modest peaks at <i>p</i> = 1-9E-06, for a total of 15 suggestive associations at this locus. In the NRN pathway analysis, multiple pathways were identified, with the most significant being \"GO_mf:go_low_density_lipoprotein_particle_receptor_activity\" at <i>p</i> = 1.14E-06. However, these results could not be replicated in the TOLSURF cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Genomic differences are seen between infants born by spontaneous versus indicated extreme PTB. Due to the limited sample size, there is a need for larger studies.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Genomic differences are seen between infants born by spontaneous versus indicated very PTB.. · Future studies with large sample sizes evaluating extreme PTB are necessary.. · Spontaneous PTB is more common than indicated extreme PTB..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"238-249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11693484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomic Differences between Spontaneous versus Indicated Extreme Preterm Birth.\",\"authors\":\"Namasivayam Ambalavanan, C Michael Cotten, Stephen W Erickson, Ravi Mathur, Dara Torgerson, Philip L Ballard\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2347-3751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> Extremely preterm infants are at high risk of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Extreme preterm birth (PTB) may result from spontaneous preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes or may be indicated due to preeclampsia, eclampsia, hypertension, or other causes. Our objective was to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and biological pathways associated with spontaneous versus indicated extreme PTB using the neonatal genome.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> We evaluated 523 spontaneous births and 134 indicated births weighing 401 to 1,000 g at birth from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network's Genomics dataset by genome-wide association study (GWAS) and pathway analysis. The TOLSURF cohort was used to replicate the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> In the NRN GWAS, no statistically significant results were found, although the Manhattan plot showed one almost significant peak (rs60854043 on chromosome 14 at <i>p</i> = 1.03E-07) along with many other modest peaks at <i>p</i> = 1-9E-06, for a total of 15 suggestive associations at this locus. In the NRN pathway analysis, multiple pathways were identified, with the most significant being \\\"GO_mf:go_low_density_lipoprotein_particle_receptor_activity\\\" at <i>p</i> = 1.14E-06. However, these results could not be replicated in the TOLSURF cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Genomic differences are seen between infants born by spontaneous versus indicated extreme PTB. Due to the limited sample size, there is a need for larger studies.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Genomic differences are seen between infants born by spontaneous versus indicated very PTB.. · Future studies with large sample sizes evaluating extreme PTB are necessary.. · Spontaneous PTB is more common than indicated extreme PTB..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"238-249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11693484/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2347-3751\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2347-3751","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:极早产儿的新生儿死亡率和发病率都很高。极早产可能源于自发性早产或胎膜早破(PPROM),也可能源于先兆子痫、子痫、高血压或其他原因:我们的目的是利用新生儿基因组鉴定与自发性早产和指征性极早产相关的单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)和生物通路。我们通过 GWAS 和通路分析评估了 Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD 新生儿研究网络 (NRN) 基因组数据集中的 523 例自发性早产儿和 134 例指示性早产儿,这些早产儿出生时体重为 401-1000 克。TOLSURF队列被用来复制研究结果:在 NRN 基因组学分析中,虽然曼哈顿图显示了一个几乎显著的峰值(第 14 号染色体上的 rs60854043,p=1.03E-07)和许多其他 p=1-9E-06 的适度峰值,在该位点上共有 15 个提示性关联,但没有发现具有统计学意义的结果。在 NRN 通路分析中,发现了多条通路,其中最重要的是 "GO_mf:go_low_density_lipoprotein_particle_receptor_activity"(p=1.14E-06)。然而,这些结果无法在 TOLSURF 群体中重复:结论:自然分娩与指征性极早产儿之间存在基因组差异。由于样本量有限,需要进行更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genomic Differences between Spontaneous versus Indicated Extreme Preterm Birth.

Objective:  Extremely preterm infants are at high risk of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Extreme preterm birth (PTB) may result from spontaneous preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes or may be indicated due to preeclampsia, eclampsia, hypertension, or other causes. Our objective was to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and biological pathways associated with spontaneous versus indicated extreme PTB using the neonatal genome.

Study design:  We evaluated 523 spontaneous births and 134 indicated births weighing 401 to 1,000 g at birth from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network's Genomics dataset by genome-wide association study (GWAS) and pathway analysis. The TOLSURF cohort was used to replicate the results.

Results:  In the NRN GWAS, no statistically significant results were found, although the Manhattan plot showed one almost significant peak (rs60854043 on chromosome 14 at p = 1.03E-07) along with many other modest peaks at p = 1-9E-06, for a total of 15 suggestive associations at this locus. In the NRN pathway analysis, multiple pathways were identified, with the most significant being "GO_mf:go_low_density_lipoprotein_particle_receptor_activity" at p = 1.14E-06. However, these results could not be replicated in the TOLSURF cohort.

Conclusion:  Genomic differences are seen between infants born by spontaneous versus indicated extreme PTB. Due to the limited sample size, there is a need for larger studies.

Key points: · Genomic differences are seen between infants born by spontaneous versus indicated very PTB.. · Future studies with large sample sizes evaluating extreme PTB are necessary.. · Spontaneous PTB is more common than indicated extreme PTB..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信