姑息性放射剂量对转移性肉瘤症状反应的影响

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Jennifer K. Matsui , Scott Jackson , Judy Fang , Lynn Million , Alexander L. Chin , Susan M. Hiniker , Anusha Kalbasi , Everett J. Moding
{"title":"姑息性放射剂量对转移性肉瘤症状反应的影响","authors":"Jennifer K. Matsui ,&nbsp;Scott Jackson ,&nbsp;Judy Fang ,&nbsp;Lynn Million ,&nbsp;Alexander L. Chin ,&nbsp;Susan M. Hiniker ,&nbsp;Anusha Kalbasi ,&nbsp;Everett J. Moding","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Palliative radiotherapy (RT) plays a crucial role in alleviating symptoms associated with metastatic sarcoma. However, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal palliative radiation dose and fractionation for metastatic sarcomas. We analyzed the association between biologically effective radiation dose and symptom response for patients who underwent palliative RT for metastatic sarcomas</p></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><p>We retrospectively identified patients with metastatic sarcoma treated with palliative RT between 1999 and 2021 at our institution. We assessed the association between equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) with an α/β of three and symptom relief or overall survival (OS) using univariable and multivariable analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 198 metastatic sites treated, the most common indications for palliative radiation were pain (n = 181, 91 %) and compression of adjacent structures (n = 16, 8 %). In our analysis, an EQD2 of &gt; 20 Gy was associated with greater rates of short-term symptom relief (n = 143, 85 %) at the RT site compared to an EQD2 of ≤ 20 Gy (n = 14, 54 %, P = 0.001) with no reports of grade 3 or higher toxicity. However, there was no significant improvement in short-term symptom relief for higher radiation doses. Patients treated with an EQD2 of ≤ 20 Gy had a significantly worse performance status, but there was no significant difference in overall survival based on EQD2 on multivariable analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>An EQD2 ≤ 20 Gy (e.g., 8 Gy in 1 fraction) provided inadequate palliative benefit in this series. An EQD2 &gt; 20 Gy resulted in greater rates of symptom palliation in metastatic sarcomas, but further dose escalation did not improve symptom response or durability. These findings suggest standard palliative regimens such as 20 Gy in 5 fractions (EQD2 of 28 Gy) are effective for patients with metastatic sarcomas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000806/pdfft?md5=03750ab3ed91089b900384b2208b54da&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000806-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of palliative radiation dose on symptom response in metastatic sarcomas\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer K. Matsui ,&nbsp;Scott Jackson ,&nbsp;Judy Fang ,&nbsp;Lynn Million ,&nbsp;Alexander L. Chin ,&nbsp;Susan M. Hiniker ,&nbsp;Anusha Kalbasi ,&nbsp;Everett J. Moding\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Palliative radiotherapy (RT) plays a crucial role in alleviating symptoms associated with metastatic sarcoma. However, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal palliative radiation dose and fractionation for metastatic sarcomas. We analyzed the association between biologically effective radiation dose and symptom response for patients who underwent palliative RT for metastatic sarcomas</p></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><p>We retrospectively identified patients with metastatic sarcoma treated with palliative RT between 1999 and 2021 at our institution. We assessed the association between equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) with an α/β of three and symptom relief or overall survival (OS) using univariable and multivariable analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 198 metastatic sites treated, the most common indications for palliative radiation were pain (n = 181, 91 %) and compression of adjacent structures (n = 16, 8 %). In our analysis, an EQD2 of &gt; 20 Gy was associated with greater rates of short-term symptom relief (n = 143, 85 %) at the RT site compared to an EQD2 of ≤ 20 Gy (n = 14, 54 %, P = 0.001) with no reports of grade 3 or higher toxicity. However, there was no significant improvement in short-term symptom relief for higher radiation doses. Patients treated with an EQD2 of ≤ 20 Gy had a significantly worse performance status, but there was no significant difference in overall survival based on EQD2 on multivariable analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>An EQD2 ≤ 20 Gy (e.g., 8 Gy in 1 fraction) provided inadequate palliative benefit in this series. An EQD2 &gt; 20 Gy resulted in greater rates of symptom palliation in metastatic sarcomas, but further dose escalation did not improve symptom response or durability. These findings suggest standard palliative regimens such as 20 Gy in 5 fractions (EQD2 of 28 Gy) are effective for patients with metastatic sarcomas.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000806/pdfft?md5=03750ab3ed91089b900384b2208b54da&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000806-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000806\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000806","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 姑息性放射治疗(RT)在缓解转移性肉瘤相关症状方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,对于转移性肉瘤的最佳姑息性放射剂量和分次放疗还缺乏共识。我们分析了接受姑息性 RT 治疗的转移性肉瘤患者的生物有效辐射剂量与症状反应之间的关系。我们使用单变量和多变量分析评估了α/β为3的2 Gy分段等效剂量(EQD2)与症状缓解或总生存率(OS)之间的关系。结果在接受治疗的198个转移部位中,最常见的姑息性放射适应症是疼痛(n = 181,91%)和邻近结构受压(n = 16,8%)。在我们的分析中,与 EQD2≤20 Gy(n=14,54%,P=0.001)相比,EQD2> 20 Gy 与放射治疗部位的短期症状缓解率(n=143,85%)更相关,且无 3 级或更高毒性的报告。不过,放射剂量越高,短期症状缓解效果越好。EQD2≤20Gy的患者表现状态明显较差,但根据EQD2进行多变量分析,总生存率无明显差异。EQD2 > 20 Gy能使转移性肉瘤的症状缓解率提高,但剂量的进一步增加并不能改善症状反应或持久性。这些研究结果表明,标准的姑息治疗方案,如5次分次20 Gy(EQD2为28 Gy),对转移性肉瘤患者是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of palliative radiation dose on symptom response in metastatic sarcomas

Purpose

Palliative radiotherapy (RT) plays a crucial role in alleviating symptoms associated with metastatic sarcoma. However, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal palliative radiation dose and fractionation for metastatic sarcomas. We analyzed the association between biologically effective radiation dose and symptom response for patients who underwent palliative RT for metastatic sarcomas

Methods and materials

We retrospectively identified patients with metastatic sarcoma treated with palliative RT between 1999 and 2021 at our institution. We assessed the association between equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) with an α/β of three and symptom relief or overall survival (OS) using univariable and multivariable analyses.

Results

Of the 198 metastatic sites treated, the most common indications for palliative radiation were pain (n = 181, 91 %) and compression of adjacent structures (n = 16, 8 %). In our analysis, an EQD2 of > 20 Gy was associated with greater rates of short-term symptom relief (n = 143, 85 %) at the RT site compared to an EQD2 of ≤ 20 Gy (n = 14, 54 %, P = 0.001) with no reports of grade 3 or higher toxicity. However, there was no significant improvement in short-term symptom relief for higher radiation doses. Patients treated with an EQD2 of ≤ 20 Gy had a significantly worse performance status, but there was no significant difference in overall survival based on EQD2 on multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

An EQD2 ≤ 20 Gy (e.g., 8 Gy in 1 fraction) provided inadequate palliative benefit in this series. An EQD2 > 20 Gy resulted in greater rates of symptom palliation in metastatic sarcomas, but further dose escalation did not improve symptom response or durability. These findings suggest standard palliative regimens such as 20 Gy in 5 fractions (EQD2 of 28 Gy) are effective for patients with metastatic sarcomas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信