改善呼吸困难的培训研究--患者使用高频气道振荡器的体验

E. Daynes, L. Houchen-Wolloff, A. Barradell, Neil Greening, Sally J Singh
{"title":"改善呼吸困难的培训研究--患者使用高频气道振荡器的体验","authors":"E. Daynes, L. Houchen-Wolloff, A. Barradell, Neil Greening, Sally J Singh","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S443186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The High Frequency Airway Oscillating device (HFAO) was developed to help patients with COPD feel less breathless through flow resistive respiratory muscle training and fixed rate oscillations. Previous work has demonstrated that this device can improve inspiratory muscle strength over and above a sham device. Both groups improved their breathlessness and preserved clinical benefits though there were no statistically significant differences seen over and above the sham device. It is important to understand patient perceptions of using a device and how this may influence their treatment and therefore a qualitative analysis was conducted to understand participant experiences of a HFAO device. Methods This was an exploratory qualitative analysis involving participants recruited to the Training to Improve Dyspnoea (TIDe) study. Participants completed a satisfaction survey and were invited to take part in a focus group. Focus groups were conducted by a researcher independent to the randomised controlled trial. Data was analysed independently by two researchers using inductive thematic analysis, and themes/sub-themes were agreed jointly. Data is presented in themes and sub themes and triangulated with survey response data. Results Fourteen participants were recruited to two focus groups (71% male, mean [SD] age 64[9] years). The key themes were patient selection, device use, and investment. Patient selection explores the disease characteristics, emotional impact and management of care. Device use explores the device prescription and usage, routine and lifestyle and effectiveness. Investment covers accessibility, understanding, benefits vs participation and overall perceptions of the device. Conclusion This research demonstrates the complexity of device interventions and that key considerations should be given to patient selection, the device use itself and, the time and cost investment required for participants to successfully implement the device into daily life.","PeriodicalId":510764,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"61 1","pages":"1345 - 1355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Training to Improve Dyspnoea Study- Patient Experiences of Using a High Frequency Airway Oscillating Device\",\"authors\":\"E. Daynes, L. Houchen-Wolloff, A. Barradell, Neil Greening, Sally J Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/COPD.S443186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction The High Frequency Airway Oscillating device (HFAO) was developed to help patients with COPD feel less breathless through flow resistive respiratory muscle training and fixed rate oscillations. Previous work has demonstrated that this device can improve inspiratory muscle strength over and above a sham device. Both groups improved their breathlessness and preserved clinical benefits though there were no statistically significant differences seen over and above the sham device. It is important to understand patient perceptions of using a device and how this may influence their treatment and therefore a qualitative analysis was conducted to understand participant experiences of a HFAO device. Methods This was an exploratory qualitative analysis involving participants recruited to the Training to Improve Dyspnoea (TIDe) study. Participants completed a satisfaction survey and were invited to take part in a focus group. Focus groups were conducted by a researcher independent to the randomised controlled trial. Data was analysed independently by two researchers using inductive thematic analysis, and themes/sub-themes were agreed jointly. Data is presented in themes and sub themes and triangulated with survey response data. Results Fourteen participants were recruited to two focus groups (71% male, mean [SD] age 64[9] years). The key themes were patient selection, device use, and investment. Patient selection explores the disease characteristics, emotional impact and management of care. Device use explores the device prescription and usage, routine and lifestyle and effectiveness. Investment covers accessibility, understanding, benefits vs participation and overall perceptions of the device. Conclusion This research demonstrates the complexity of device interventions and that key considerations should be given to patient selection, the device use itself and, the time and cost investment required for participants to successfully implement the device into daily life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"1345 - 1355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S443186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S443186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言 高频气道振荡装置(HFAO)的开发目的是通过流动阻力呼吸肌训练和固定频率振荡帮助慢性阻塞性肺病患者减少呼吸困难。先前的研究表明,该装置比假装置更能改善吸气肌力。两组患者都改善了呼吸困难状况,并保留了临床疗效,但与假装置相比,没有统计学意义上的显著差异。因此,我们进行了一项定性分析,以了解受试者对 HFAO 设备的体验。方法 这是一项探索性定性分析,涉及 "改善呼吸困难培训"(TIDe)研究的参与者。参与者填写了一份满意度调查表,并受邀参加了一个焦点小组。焦点小组由一名独立于随机对照试验的研究人员主持。两名研究人员采用归纳式主题分析法对数据进行了独立分析,并共同商定了主题/次主题。数据以主题和次主题的形式呈现,并与调查回复数据进行三角验证。结果 两个焦点小组共招募了 14 名参与者(71% 为男性,平均 [SD] 年龄为 64[9] 岁)。关键主题是患者选择、设备使用和投资。患者选择探讨了疾病特征、情绪影响和护理管理。设备使用探讨了设备的处方和使用、常规和生活方式以及有效性。投资包括设备的可获得性、理解、收益与参与以及对设备的总体看法。结论 这项研究表明了设备干预的复杂性,应重点考虑患者选择、设备使用本身以及参与者在日常生活中成功使用设备所需的时间和成本投入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Training to Improve Dyspnoea Study- Patient Experiences of Using a High Frequency Airway Oscillating Device
Introduction The High Frequency Airway Oscillating device (HFAO) was developed to help patients with COPD feel less breathless through flow resistive respiratory muscle training and fixed rate oscillations. Previous work has demonstrated that this device can improve inspiratory muscle strength over and above a sham device. Both groups improved their breathlessness and preserved clinical benefits though there were no statistically significant differences seen over and above the sham device. It is important to understand patient perceptions of using a device and how this may influence their treatment and therefore a qualitative analysis was conducted to understand participant experiences of a HFAO device. Methods This was an exploratory qualitative analysis involving participants recruited to the Training to Improve Dyspnoea (TIDe) study. Participants completed a satisfaction survey and were invited to take part in a focus group. Focus groups were conducted by a researcher independent to the randomised controlled trial. Data was analysed independently by two researchers using inductive thematic analysis, and themes/sub-themes were agreed jointly. Data is presented in themes and sub themes and triangulated with survey response data. Results Fourteen participants were recruited to two focus groups (71% male, mean [SD] age 64[9] years). The key themes were patient selection, device use, and investment. Patient selection explores the disease characteristics, emotional impact and management of care. Device use explores the device prescription and usage, routine and lifestyle and effectiveness. Investment covers accessibility, understanding, benefits vs participation and overall perceptions of the device. Conclusion This research demonstrates the complexity of device interventions and that key considerations should be given to patient selection, the device use itself and, the time and cost investment required for participants to successfully implement the device into daily life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信