为什么要赔偿?种族与公众对赔偿的看法

RSF Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.7758/RSF.2024.10.3.02
Jesse H. Rhodes, Tatishe M. Nteta, Lilliauna Hopkins, Gregory Wall
{"title":"为什么要赔偿?种族与公众对赔偿的看法","authors":"Jesse H. Rhodes, Tatishe M. Nteta, Lilliauna Hopkins, Gregory Wall","doi":"10.7758/RSF.2024.10.3.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During a period of rising partisan and racial polarization, how do partisanship, ideology, and racial antagonism influence attitudes toward reparations policies directed at the descendants of slaves? In this article, we use a wealth of public opinion data to examine trends in attitudes toward reparations and analyze the correlates of opposition to reparations proposals. We hypothesize that, given the ascendance over the past decade of a powerful racial justice movement and ensuing conservative backlash, racial attitudes should be particularly powerful in determining attitudes toward reparations. Using four original, nationally representative surveys, we show that negative racial attitudes play a central role in determining opposition to reparations, with effects that typically rival or exceed those of Republican partisanship or conservative ideology.","PeriodicalId":516617,"journal":{"name":"RSF","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Reparations? Race and Public Opinion Toward Reparations\",\"authors\":\"Jesse H. Rhodes, Tatishe M. Nteta, Lilliauna Hopkins, Gregory Wall\",\"doi\":\"10.7758/RSF.2024.10.3.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During a period of rising partisan and racial polarization, how do partisanship, ideology, and racial antagonism influence attitudes toward reparations policies directed at the descendants of slaves? In this article, we use a wealth of public opinion data to examine trends in attitudes toward reparations and analyze the correlates of opposition to reparations proposals. We hypothesize that, given the ascendance over the past decade of a powerful racial justice movement and ensuing conservative backlash, racial attitudes should be particularly powerful in determining attitudes toward reparations. Using four original, nationally representative surveys, we show that negative racial attitudes play a central role in determining opposition to reparations, with effects that typically rival or exceed those of Republican partisanship or conservative ideology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RSF\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RSF\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2024.10.3.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSF","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2024.10.3.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在党派和种族两极分化日益加剧的时期,党派、意识形态和种族对立如何影响人们对针对奴隶后代的赔偿政策的态度?在这篇文章中,我们利用大量的民意数据研究了人们对赔偿的态度趋势,并分析了反对赔偿提案的相关因素。我们假设,鉴于过去十年中强大的种族正义运动的兴起以及随之而来的保守派的反弹,种族态度在决定人们对赔偿的态度方面应该特别强大。通过四项具有全国代表性的原创调查,我们发现,负面的种族态度在决定反对赔偿的态度中起着核心作用,其影响通常可与共和党党派或保守意识形态相媲美,甚至超过它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Reparations? Race and Public Opinion Toward Reparations
During a period of rising partisan and racial polarization, how do partisanship, ideology, and racial antagonism influence attitudes toward reparations policies directed at the descendants of slaves? In this article, we use a wealth of public opinion data to examine trends in attitudes toward reparations and analyze the correlates of opposition to reparations proposals. We hypothesize that, given the ascendance over the past decade of a powerful racial justice movement and ensuing conservative backlash, racial attitudes should be particularly powerful in determining attitudes toward reparations. Using four original, nationally representative surveys, we show that negative racial attitudes play a central role in determining opposition to reparations, with effects that typically rival or exceed those of Republican partisanship or conservative ideology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
RSF
RSF
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信