患者安全--我们说的是同一种语言吗?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
{"title":"患者安全--我们说的是同一种语言吗?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2024.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Since the radical years following the <em>To Err is Human</em><span> report, patient safety<span> research has become settled on standardisation and audit<span> cultures. Recent work suggests a change in direction. Current efforts exploring the intricate relationship between stability and change within organisations establish a more balanced patient safety perspective. Frontline staff insights are key to this new knowledge.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p><span>This study aims to explore the patient safety perceptions of registered nurses working directly with patients in </span>acute care settings.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Facilitated reflexive workshops were conducted with nine wards from October to November 2022. Data analysis explored creative works and reflective notes of group discussions with frontline registered nurses using a critical lens.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We offer four analytical interpretations of how frontline registered nurses understand and experience patient safety. These are as follows: buzzwords, keep ME safe, listen to US, and this is MY role. These manifest the business of patient safety where nurses are, under siege, the silenced team member and experience tension between accountability and responsibility.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Critical questioning and reappraisal of patient safety practices require the vast knowledge of frontline staff to be fully utilised.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This research reveals much of what is avoided in patient safety literature — the tension between what registered nurses understand, experience, and can deliver in patient safety practice. It challenges organisational leaders to enable and support frontline nurses in driving local change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"31 5","pages":"Pages 284-291"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient safety — Are we speaking the same language?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.colegn.2024.05.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Since the radical years following the <em>To Err is Human</em><span> report, patient safety<span> research has become settled on standardisation and audit<span> cultures. Recent work suggests a change in direction. Current efforts exploring the intricate relationship between stability and change within organisations establish a more balanced patient safety perspective. Frontline staff insights are key to this new knowledge.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p><span>This study aims to explore the patient safety perceptions of registered nurses working directly with patients in </span>acute care settings.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Facilitated reflexive workshops were conducted with nine wards from October to November 2022. Data analysis explored creative works and reflective notes of group discussions with frontline registered nurses using a critical lens.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>We offer four analytical interpretations of how frontline registered nurses understand and experience patient safety. These are as follows: buzzwords, keep ME safe, listen to US, and this is MY role. These manifest the business of patient safety where nurses are, under siege, the silenced team member and experience tension between accountability and responsibility.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Critical questioning and reappraisal of patient safety practices require the vast knowledge of frontline staff to be fully utilised.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This research reveals much of what is avoided in patient safety literature — the tension between what registered nurses understand, experience, and can deliver in patient safety practice. It challenges organisational leaders to enable and support frontline nurses in driving local change.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collegian\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 284-291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collegian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000349\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景自 "出错即是人"(To Err is Human)报告发表后的激进年代以来,患者安全研究一直停留在标准化和审计文化上。最近的研究表明,研究方向发生了变化。目前,研究机构内部稳定与变化之间错综复杂关系的工作建立了一个更加平衡的患者安全视角。本研究旨在探讨在急症护理环境中直接与患者打交道的注册护士对患者安全的看法。研究方法:2022 年 10 月至 11 月,在九个病房开展了促进性反思研讨会。研究结果我们对一线注册护士如何理解和体验患者安全提供了四种分析性解释。它们是:流行语、保证我的安全、倾听我们的意见、这是我的职责。讨论对患者安全实践的批判性质疑和重新评估需要充分利用一线员工的丰富知识。结论这项研究揭示了患者安全文献中被回避的大部分内容--注册护士在患者安全实践中的理解、体验和能力之间的紧张关系。它向组织领导者提出了挑战,要求他们支持一线护士推动当地的变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient safety — Are we speaking the same language?

Background

Since the radical years following the To Err is Human report, patient safety research has become settled on standardisation and audit cultures. Recent work suggests a change in direction. Current efforts exploring the intricate relationship between stability and change within organisations establish a more balanced patient safety perspective. Frontline staff insights are key to this new knowledge.

Aim

This study aims to explore the patient safety perceptions of registered nurses working directly with patients in acute care settings.

Method

Facilitated reflexive workshops were conducted with nine wards from October to November 2022. Data analysis explored creative works and reflective notes of group discussions with frontline registered nurses using a critical lens.

Findings

We offer four analytical interpretations of how frontline registered nurses understand and experience patient safety. These are as follows: buzzwords, keep ME safe, listen to US, and this is MY role. These manifest the business of patient safety where nurses are, under siege, the silenced team member and experience tension between accountability and responsibility.

Discussion

Critical questioning and reappraisal of patient safety practices require the vast knowledge of frontline staff to be fully utilised.

Conclusion

This research reveals much of what is avoided in patient safety literature — the tension between what registered nurses understand, experience, and can deliver in patient safety practice. It challenges organisational leaders to enable and support frontline nurses in driving local change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信