Ruben Van den Brande , Maxim Van den Kieboom , Marc Peeters , Charlotte Billiet , Erik Van de Kelft
{"title":"放疗后溶解性脊柱转移灶的再矿化--传统体外放射治疗与立体定向烧蚀体放射治疗比较的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Ruben Van den Brande , Maxim Van den Kieboom , Marc Peeters , Charlotte Billiet , Erik Van de Kelft","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Osteolytic spinal metastases (SM) have a higher risk of fracture. In this study we aim to confirm the remineralization of lytic SM after radiation therapy. Secondary the influence of SBRT compared to cEBRT and tumor type will be analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>87 patients, 100 SM were included. 29 received SBRT, 71 cEBRT. Most common primary tumors were breast (35 %), lung (26 %) and renal (11 %). Both cEBRT and SBRT resulted in a significant increase of bone mineral density (BMD) (83.76 HU ± 5.72 → 241.41 HU ± 22.58 (p < 0.001) and 82.45 ± 9.13 → 179.38 ± 47.83p = 0.026). There was a significant increase in absolute difference of BMD between the SM and reference vertebrae (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between SBRT and cEBRT. There was no increase of BMD in renal lytic SM after radiation therapy (pre-treatment: 85.96 HU ± 19.07; 3 m 92.00 HU ± 21.86 (p = 0.882); 6 m 92.06 HU ± 23.94 (p = 0.902); 9 m 70.44 HU ± 7.45 (p = 0.213); 12 m 98.08 HU ± 11.24 (p = 0.740)). In all other primary tumors, a significant increase of BMD after radiation therapy was demonstrated (p < 0,05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We conclude that the BMD of lytic SM increases significantly after radiation therapy. Lytic SM of primary renal tumors are the exception; there is no significant remineralization of renal lytic SM after radiation therapy. There is no benefit of SBRT over cEBRT in this remineralization. These findings should be taken into account when deciding on surgery in the potentially unstable group defined by the spinal instability neoplastic score.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 100805"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563082400082X/pdfft?md5=4f8ef0023f8c09ab89107f6ffeef76aa&pid=1-s2.0-S240563082400082X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remineralization of lytic spinal metastases after radiation therapy – A retrospective cohort study comparing conventional external beam radiation therapy with stereotactic ablative body radiation\",\"authors\":\"Ruben Van den Brande , Maxim Van den Kieboom , Marc Peeters , Charlotte Billiet , Erik Van de Kelft\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Osteolytic spinal metastases (SM) have a higher risk of fracture. In this study we aim to confirm the remineralization of lytic SM after radiation therapy. Secondary the influence of SBRT compared to cEBRT and tumor type will be analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>87 patients, 100 SM were included. 29 received SBRT, 71 cEBRT. Most common primary tumors were breast (35 %), lung (26 %) and renal (11 %). Both cEBRT and SBRT resulted in a significant increase of bone mineral density (BMD) (83.76 HU ± 5.72 → 241.41 HU ± 22.58 (p < 0.001) and 82.45 ± 9.13 → 179.38 ± 47.83p = 0.026). There was a significant increase in absolute difference of BMD between the SM and reference vertebrae (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between SBRT and cEBRT. There was no increase of BMD in renal lytic SM after radiation therapy (pre-treatment: 85.96 HU ± 19.07; 3 m 92.00 HU ± 21.86 (p = 0.882); 6 m 92.06 HU ± 23.94 (p = 0.902); 9 m 70.44 HU ± 7.45 (p = 0.213); 12 m 98.08 HU ± 11.24 (p = 0.740)). In all other primary tumors, a significant increase of BMD after radiation therapy was demonstrated (p < 0,05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We conclude that the BMD of lytic SM increases significantly after radiation therapy. Lytic SM of primary renal tumors are the exception; there is no significant remineralization of renal lytic SM after radiation therapy. There is no benefit of SBRT over cEBRT in this remineralization. These findings should be taken into account when deciding on surgery in the potentially unstable group defined by the spinal instability neoplastic score.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"48 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100805\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563082400082X/pdfft?md5=4f8ef0023f8c09ab89107f6ffeef76aa&pid=1-s2.0-S240563082400082X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563082400082X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563082400082X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言溶骨性脊柱转移瘤(SM)发生骨折的风险较高。在这项研究中,我们旨在证实溶骨性脊柱转移瘤在放疗后的再矿化情况。方法进行了一项回顾性队列研究。29例接受了SBRT,71例接受了cEBRT。最常见的原发肿瘤是乳腺癌(35%)、肺癌(26%)和肾癌(11%)。cEBRT 和 SBRT 均可显著增加骨矿物质密度(BMD)(83.76 HU ± 5.72 → 241.41 HU ± 22.58 (p < 0.001) 和 82.45 ± 9.13 → 179.38 ± 47.83p = 0.026)。SM椎体和参照椎体之间的 BMD 绝对值差异明显增加(p < 0.001)。SBRT 和 cEBRT 之间无明显差异。放疗后,肾溶解性 SM 的 BMD 没有增加(治疗前:85.96 HU ± 19.07;3 m 92.00 HU ± 21.86(p = 0.882);6 m 92.06 HU ± 23.94(p = 0.902);9 m 70.44 HU ± 7.45(p = 0.213);12 m 98.08 HU ± 11.24(p = 0.740))。结论我们得出结论,溶血性 SM 的 BMD 在放疗后显著增加。原发性肾肿瘤的溶解性 SM 是个例外;放疗后肾溶解性 SM 没有明显的再矿化。在这种再矿化方面,SBRT 比 cEBRT 没有优势。在根据脊柱不稳定性肿瘤评分确定潜在不稳定组的手术方案时,应考虑到这些发现。
Remineralization of lytic spinal metastases after radiation therapy – A retrospective cohort study comparing conventional external beam radiation therapy with stereotactic ablative body radiation
Introduction
Osteolytic spinal metastases (SM) have a higher risk of fracture. In this study we aim to confirm the remineralization of lytic SM after radiation therapy. Secondary the influence of SBRT compared to cEBRT and tumor type will be analyzed.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was performed.
Results
87 patients, 100 SM were included. 29 received SBRT, 71 cEBRT. Most common primary tumors were breast (35 %), lung (26 %) and renal (11 %). Both cEBRT and SBRT resulted in a significant increase of bone mineral density (BMD) (83.76 HU ± 5.72 → 241.41 HU ± 22.58 (p < 0.001) and 82.45 ± 9.13 → 179.38 ± 47.83p = 0.026). There was a significant increase in absolute difference of BMD between the SM and reference vertebrae (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between SBRT and cEBRT. There was no increase of BMD in renal lytic SM after radiation therapy (pre-treatment: 85.96 HU ± 19.07; 3 m 92.00 HU ± 21.86 (p = 0.882); 6 m 92.06 HU ± 23.94 (p = 0.902); 9 m 70.44 HU ± 7.45 (p = 0.213); 12 m 98.08 HU ± 11.24 (p = 0.740)). In all other primary tumors, a significant increase of BMD after radiation therapy was demonstrated (p < 0,05).
Conclusion
We conclude that the BMD of lytic SM increases significantly after radiation therapy. Lytic SM of primary renal tumors are the exception; there is no significant remineralization of renal lytic SM after radiation therapy. There is no benefit of SBRT over cEBRT in this remineralization. These findings should be taken into account when deciding on surgery in the potentially unstable group defined by the spinal instability neoplastic score.