嵌入式动机访谈与智能手机应用相结合,增加亚急性腰背痛患者的体育锻炼:分组随机对照试验

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jason Holden , Paul O'Halloran , Megan Davidson , Jeff Breckon , Wenny Rahayu , Melissa Monfries , Nicholas F. Taylor
{"title":"嵌入式动机访谈与智能手机应用相结合,增加亚急性腰背痛患者的体育锻炼:分组随机对照试验","authors":"Jason Holden ,&nbsp;Paul O'Halloran ,&nbsp;Megan Davidson ,&nbsp;Jeff Breckon ,&nbsp;Wenny Rahayu ,&nbsp;Melissa Monfries ,&nbsp;Nicholas F. Taylor","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Moderately vigorous physical activity (PA) may be beneficial for people with sub-acute low back pain (LBP), but may initially be painful for patients and challenging for physical therapists to facilitate.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study investigated motivational interviewing (MI) delivered by physical therapists and a smartphone app for increasing PA in people with LBP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A mixed methods cluster randomised controlled trial involving 46 adults with LBP in Melbourne, Australia. Participants attended weekly 30-min physical therapy consultations for 6 weeks. Experimental group physical therapists were taught to embed MI into consultations and patients were provided with a self-directed app. The primary outcome was accelerometer-derived moderately vigorous PA. Secondary outcomes were LBP disability (Oswestry Disability Index), functional capacity (Patient Specific Functional Scale), and self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire). Between-group differences were analysed by ANCOVA post-intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no statistically significant difference between the experimental group and control group for PA. Between-group differences in LBP disability (MD= 19.4 units, 95% CI: 8.5, 30.3), functional capacity (primary MD= −4.1 units, 95% CI: −6.9, −1.3; average MD= −3.1, 95% CI: −4.9, −1.2) and self-efficacy (MD −11.3 units, 95%CI −20.2, −2.5) favoured the control group with small to moderate effect sizes. There were low levels of overall engagement with the app.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The embedded MI intervention was no more beneficial than physical therapy alone for PA and was associated with poorer LBP disability, function, and self-efficacy. The effectiveness of embedding MI and a smartphone app into usual care for LBP was not supported.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S141335552400501X/pdfft?md5=d8f2a682794c7cd9c5c685f9ed5b43b1&pid=1-s2.0-S141335552400501X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Embedded motivational interviewing combined with a smartphone application to increase physical activity in people with sub-acute low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Jason Holden ,&nbsp;Paul O'Halloran ,&nbsp;Megan Davidson ,&nbsp;Jeff Breckon ,&nbsp;Wenny Rahayu ,&nbsp;Melissa Monfries ,&nbsp;Nicholas F. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Moderately vigorous physical activity (PA) may be beneficial for people with sub-acute low back pain (LBP), but may initially be painful for patients and challenging for physical therapists to facilitate.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study investigated motivational interviewing (MI) delivered by physical therapists and a smartphone app for increasing PA in people with LBP.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A mixed methods cluster randomised controlled trial involving 46 adults with LBP in Melbourne, Australia. Participants attended weekly 30-min physical therapy consultations for 6 weeks. Experimental group physical therapists were taught to embed MI into consultations and patients were provided with a self-directed app. The primary outcome was accelerometer-derived moderately vigorous PA. Secondary outcomes were LBP disability (Oswestry Disability Index), functional capacity (Patient Specific Functional Scale), and self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire). Between-group differences were analysed by ANCOVA post-intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no statistically significant difference between the experimental group and control group for PA. Between-group differences in LBP disability (MD= 19.4 units, 95% CI: 8.5, 30.3), functional capacity (primary MD= −4.1 units, 95% CI: −6.9, −1.3; average MD= −3.1, 95% CI: −4.9, −1.2) and self-efficacy (MD −11.3 units, 95%CI −20.2, −2.5) favoured the control group with small to moderate effect sizes. There were low levels of overall engagement with the app.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The embedded MI intervention was no more beneficial than physical therapy alone for PA and was associated with poorer LBP disability, function, and self-efficacy. The effectiveness of embedding MI and a smartphone app into usual care for LBP was not supported.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S141335552400501X/pdfft?md5=d8f2a682794c7cd9c5c685f9ed5b43b1&pid=1-s2.0-S141335552400501X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S141335552400501X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S141335552400501X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景中等强度的体力活动(PA)可能对亚急性腰背痛(LBP)患者有益,但最初可能会给患者带来痛苦,而且对物理治疗师来说,促进体力活动也具有挑战性。目的本研究调查了物理治疗师提供的动机访谈(MI)和智能手机应用程序对增加腰背痛患者体力活动的作用。参与者每周接受 30 分钟的物理治疗咨询,为期 6 周。实验组物理治疗师接受了将多元智能融入咨询的教学,患者则获得了一款自我指导的应用程序。主要结果是加速度计得出的中度剧烈运动。次要结果为枸杞多糖症残疾(Oswestry 残疾指数)、功能能力(患者特定功能量表)和自我效能(疼痛自我效能问卷)。实验组与对照组在运动量方面的差异无统计学意义。实验组和对照组在腰背痛残疾(MD= 19.4 个单位,95% CI:8.5,30.3)、功能能力(主要 MD=-4.1 个单位,95% CI:-6.9,-1.3;平均 MD=-3.1,95% CI:-4.9,-1.2)和自我效能感(MD-11.3 个单位,95%CI -20.2,-2.5)方面的组间差异偏向于对照组,影响大小为小到中等。结论:嵌入式多元智能干预并不比单纯的物理治疗对腰椎间盘突出症更有益,而且与较差的腰椎间盘突出症残疾、功能和自我效能相关。将多元智能和智能手机应用程序嵌入枸杞痛的常规护理中的有效性未得到支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Embedded motivational interviewing combined with a smartphone application to increase physical activity in people with sub-acute low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Background

Moderately vigorous physical activity (PA) may be beneficial for people with sub-acute low back pain (LBP), but may initially be painful for patients and challenging for physical therapists to facilitate.

Objectives

This study investigated motivational interviewing (MI) delivered by physical therapists and a smartphone app for increasing PA in people with LBP.

Methods

A mixed methods cluster randomised controlled trial involving 46 adults with LBP in Melbourne, Australia. Participants attended weekly 30-min physical therapy consultations for 6 weeks. Experimental group physical therapists were taught to embed MI into consultations and patients were provided with a self-directed app. The primary outcome was accelerometer-derived moderately vigorous PA. Secondary outcomes were LBP disability (Oswestry Disability Index), functional capacity (Patient Specific Functional Scale), and self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire). Between-group differences were analysed by ANCOVA post-intervention.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the experimental group and control group for PA. Between-group differences in LBP disability (MD= 19.4 units, 95% CI: 8.5, 30.3), functional capacity (primary MD= −4.1 units, 95% CI: −6.9, −1.3; average MD= −3.1, 95% CI: −4.9, −1.2) and self-efficacy (MD −11.3 units, 95%CI −20.2, −2.5) favoured the control group with small to moderate effect sizes. There were low levels of overall engagement with the app.

Conclusion

The embedded MI intervention was no more beneficial than physical therapy alone for PA and was associated with poorer LBP disability, function, and self-efficacy. The effectiveness of embedding MI and a smartphone app into usual care for LBP was not supported.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT) is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Physical Therapy Research and Graduate Studies (ABRAPG-Ft). It publishes original research articles on topics related to the areas of physical therapy and rehabilitation sciences, including clinical, basic or applied studies on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of movement disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信