将太阳能区域供热与建筑物翻新作为农村地区供热脱碳措施的比较

Jan Kelch, Oleg Kusyy, Johannes Zipplies, Janybek Orozaliev, Klaus Vajen
{"title":"将太阳能区域供热与建筑物翻新作为农村地区供热脱碳措施的比较","authors":"Jan Kelch,&nbsp;Oleg Kusyy,&nbsp;Johannes Zipplies,&nbsp;Janybek Orozaliev,&nbsp;Klaus Vajen","doi":"10.1016/j.seja.2024.100060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study two different decarbonization strategies for rural heat supply are compared on the example of 180 buildings located in a small village in Germany with about 860 inhabitants and typically mainly old buildings, partly in half-timbered construction. The comparison shows that erection of a solar district heating system with solar fraction of about 67 % leads to similar heating costs as an energy efficient renovation followed by installation of decentralized air source heat pumps for most of the buildings. Both concepts aim to achieve a heat supply that is free from the local use of fossil fuels. While the solar district heating system can probably be realized within a few years and therefore achieves the full CO<sub>2</sub> savings promptly, this would take decades for the implementation of energy efficient renovation and heat pumps due to low renovation rate. Reaching climate-neutrality for the heat supply could thus be accelerated significantly by the construction of a solar district heating system. Moreover, the two decarbonization approaches do not appear to be fundamentally mutually exclusive: subsequent steady renovation of connected buildings will either increase solar share in heat supply or enable connection of new consumers at similar solar coverage rate. However, it should be also noted that with solar district heating alone, not always the same thermal comfort as with reinforced building renovation is achieved.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101174,"journal":{"name":"Solar Energy Advances","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100060"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266711312400010X/pdfft?md5=e097ad514ad30d676a76ab75029062d0&pid=1-s2.0-S266711312400010X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of solar district heating and renovation of buildings as measures for decarbonization of heat supply in rural areas\",\"authors\":\"Jan Kelch,&nbsp;Oleg Kusyy,&nbsp;Johannes Zipplies,&nbsp;Janybek Orozaliev,&nbsp;Klaus Vajen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.seja.2024.100060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study two different decarbonization strategies for rural heat supply are compared on the example of 180 buildings located in a small village in Germany with about 860 inhabitants and typically mainly old buildings, partly in half-timbered construction. The comparison shows that erection of a solar district heating system with solar fraction of about 67 % leads to similar heating costs as an energy efficient renovation followed by installation of decentralized air source heat pumps for most of the buildings. Both concepts aim to achieve a heat supply that is free from the local use of fossil fuels. While the solar district heating system can probably be realized within a few years and therefore achieves the full CO<sub>2</sub> savings promptly, this would take decades for the implementation of energy efficient renovation and heat pumps due to low renovation rate. Reaching climate-neutrality for the heat supply could thus be accelerated significantly by the construction of a solar district heating system. Moreover, the two decarbonization approaches do not appear to be fundamentally mutually exclusive: subsequent steady renovation of connected buildings will either increase solar share in heat supply or enable connection of new consumers at similar solar coverage rate. However, it should be also noted that with solar district heating alone, not always the same thermal comfort as with reinforced building renovation is achieved.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Solar Energy Advances\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100060\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266711312400010X/pdfft?md5=e097ad514ad30d676a76ab75029062d0&pid=1-s2.0-S266711312400010X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Solar Energy Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266711312400010X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Energy Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266711312400010X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以德国一个小村庄的 180 栋建筑为例,比较了两种不同的农村供热去碳化策略,该村庄约有 860 名居民,主要是老式建筑,部分为半木结构。比较结果表明,安装太阳能区域供热系统(太阳能利用率约为 67%)所需的供热成本与节能改造后为大部分建筑物安装分散式空气源热泵所需的供热成本相近。这两个概念的目的都是实现供热,无需在当地使用化石燃料。太阳能区域供热系统可能在几年内就能实现,因此可以迅速实现二氧化碳的全部减排,而节能改造和热泵的实施则需要几十年的时间,因为改造率较低。因此,建设太阳能区域供热系统可以大大加快实现供热的气候中立性。此外,这两种去碳化方法从根本上讲似乎并不相互排斥:随后对已连接建筑物的稳定翻新将增加太阳能在供热中的比例,或以类似的太阳能覆盖率连接新的用户。然而,还应注意的是,仅靠太阳能区域供热并不总能达到与加强建筑翻新相同的热舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of solar district heating and renovation of buildings as measures for decarbonization of heat supply in rural areas

In this study two different decarbonization strategies for rural heat supply are compared on the example of 180 buildings located in a small village in Germany with about 860 inhabitants and typically mainly old buildings, partly in half-timbered construction. The comparison shows that erection of a solar district heating system with solar fraction of about 67 % leads to similar heating costs as an energy efficient renovation followed by installation of decentralized air source heat pumps for most of the buildings. Both concepts aim to achieve a heat supply that is free from the local use of fossil fuels. While the solar district heating system can probably be realized within a few years and therefore achieves the full CO2 savings promptly, this would take decades for the implementation of energy efficient renovation and heat pumps due to low renovation rate. Reaching climate-neutrality for the heat supply could thus be accelerated significantly by the construction of a solar district heating system. Moreover, the two decarbonization approaches do not appear to be fundamentally mutually exclusive: subsequent steady renovation of connected buildings will either increase solar share in heat supply or enable connection of new consumers at similar solar coverage rate. However, it should be also noted that with solar district heating alone, not always the same thermal comfort as with reinforced building renovation is achieved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信