{"title":"用于大麻合规性检测的快速准确液相色谱法","authors":"Liguo Song, Lindsey LeBlanc, Emily Jovanovich, Ammar Mohammad Al-Bataineh, Keszia Jervelle Fabien","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2024.100592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A liquid chromatography ultraviolet (LC-UV) method, which used methanol as the organic solvent for both extraction and separation, was developed for hemp compliance testing. While published methods occasionally used methanol for separation, all of them used gradient elution which would cause baseline drifts and a subsequent high limit of quantification (LOQ), and only eight or less cannabinoids were included. Our method was characterized by a baseline separation of Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC) and Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (Δ<sup>9</sup>-THCA) among nineteen cannabinoids in ten minutes and a calibration between 0.04 to 50 µg/mL, making it the most effective method validated so far. However, a reproducible separation of Δ<sup>9</sup>-THCA could not be achieved with the common formate buffer system, presumably due to its adsorption onto the C18 column which could be prevented by either using acetonitrile in the organic solvent that was widely undertaken by published methods or adding 0.1 % (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid in the aqueous solvent that was achieved only in this study. While similar problems were not reported by published methods, it was speculated that the problem could be common for all C18 columns, more or less, as the stationary phase in this study was di-isobutyl-n-octadecyl-silane without any polar imbedded moieties. Additionally, while quantification of Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC at 230 nm achieved good specificity, quantification of Δ<sup>9</sup>-THCA required 269 nm for acceptable specificity, which was verified by electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI/TOFMS), indicating no false quantification and identification of Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC and Δ<sup>9</sup>-THCA, despite the observation of ten matrix peaks in the LC-UV chromatograms and identification of three untargeted/unknown cannabinoids by ESI/TOFMS in ten samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100592"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A rapid and accurate liquid chromatographic method for hemp compliance testing\",\"authors\":\"Liguo Song, Lindsey LeBlanc, Emily Jovanovich, Ammar Mohammad Al-Bataineh, Keszia Jervelle Fabien\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forc.2024.100592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A liquid chromatography ultraviolet (LC-UV) method, which used methanol as the organic solvent for both extraction and separation, was developed for hemp compliance testing. While published methods occasionally used methanol for separation, all of them used gradient elution which would cause baseline drifts and a subsequent high limit of quantification (LOQ), and only eight or less cannabinoids were included. Our method was characterized by a baseline separation of Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC) and Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (Δ<sup>9</sup>-THCA) among nineteen cannabinoids in ten minutes and a calibration between 0.04 to 50 µg/mL, making it the most effective method validated so far. However, a reproducible separation of Δ<sup>9</sup>-THCA could not be achieved with the common formate buffer system, presumably due to its adsorption onto the C18 column which could be prevented by either using acetonitrile in the organic solvent that was widely undertaken by published methods or adding 0.1 % (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid in the aqueous solvent that was achieved only in this study. While similar problems were not reported by published methods, it was speculated that the problem could be common for all C18 columns, more or less, as the stationary phase in this study was di-isobutyl-n-octadecyl-silane without any polar imbedded moieties. Additionally, while quantification of Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC at 230 nm achieved good specificity, quantification of Δ<sup>9</sup>-THCA required 269 nm for acceptable specificity, which was verified by electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI/TOFMS), indicating no false quantification and identification of Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC and Δ<sup>9</sup>-THCA, despite the observation of ten matrix peaks in the LC-UV chromatograms and identification of three untargeted/unknown cannabinoids by ESI/TOFMS in ten samples.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100592\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170924000444\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170924000444","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A rapid and accurate liquid chromatographic method for hemp compliance testing
A liquid chromatography ultraviolet (LC-UV) method, which used methanol as the organic solvent for both extraction and separation, was developed for hemp compliance testing. While published methods occasionally used methanol for separation, all of them used gradient elution which would cause baseline drifts and a subsequent high limit of quantification (LOQ), and only eight or less cannabinoids were included. Our method was characterized by a baseline separation of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (Δ9-THCA) among nineteen cannabinoids in ten minutes and a calibration between 0.04 to 50 µg/mL, making it the most effective method validated so far. However, a reproducible separation of Δ9-THCA could not be achieved with the common formate buffer system, presumably due to its adsorption onto the C18 column which could be prevented by either using acetonitrile in the organic solvent that was widely undertaken by published methods or adding 0.1 % (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid in the aqueous solvent that was achieved only in this study. While similar problems were not reported by published methods, it was speculated that the problem could be common for all C18 columns, more or less, as the stationary phase in this study was di-isobutyl-n-octadecyl-silane without any polar imbedded moieties. Additionally, while quantification of Δ9-THC at 230 nm achieved good specificity, quantification of Δ9-THCA required 269 nm for acceptable specificity, which was verified by electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI/TOFMS), indicating no false quantification and identification of Δ9-THC and Δ9-THCA, despite the observation of ten matrix peaks in the LC-UV chromatograms and identification of three untargeted/unknown cannabinoids by ESI/TOFMS in ten samples.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.