在翻修型全肘关节置换术中取出固定良好的植入物和水泥的技术

Q4 Medicine
{"title":"在翻修型全肘关节置换术中取出固定良好的植入物和水泥的技术","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Revision total elbow arthroplasty (rTEA) is a technically challenging procedure that is associated with high rates of surgical complications. Cement removal remains an important and difficult component of rTEA. Particularly in the case of prosthetic joint infection following TEA, failure to remove all of the cement from the index procedure results in higher rates of recurrent or persistent infection. Options for cement removal include the use of nonpowered instruments, powered instruments, ultrasonic devices, arthroscopic-assisted techniques, bone episiotomies, and cortical windows. Carefully assessing the risks and benefits of each of these techniques can provide aid in both improving surgical efficiency and potentially reducing surgical morbidity during these complex procedures. The purpose of this narrative review was to explore technical aspects of cement removal for well-fixed implants during rTEA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 720-726"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techniques for removal of well-fixed implants and cement in revision total elbow arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.05.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Revision total elbow arthroplasty (rTEA) is a technically challenging procedure that is associated with high rates of surgical complications. Cement removal remains an important and difficult component of rTEA. Particularly in the case of prosthetic joint infection following TEA, failure to remove all of the cement from the index procedure results in higher rates of recurrent or persistent infection. Options for cement removal include the use of nonpowered instruments, powered instruments, ultrasonic devices, arthroscopic-assisted techniques, bone episiotomies, and cortical windows. Carefully assessing the risks and benefits of each of these techniques can provide aid in both improving surgical efficiency and potentially reducing surgical morbidity during these complex procedures. The purpose of this narrative review was to explore technical aspects of cement removal for well-fixed implants during rTEA.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 720-726\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000865\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639124000865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

翻修全肘关节置换术(rTEA)是一项技术难度高、手术并发症发生率高的手术。清除骨水泥仍然是翻修全肘关节置换术的一个重要而困难的环节。特别是在TEA术后发生假体关节感染的情况下,如果不能从索引手术中清除所有骨水泥,就会导致较高的复发或持续感染率。清除骨水泥的方法包括使用无动力器械、动力器械、超声波设备、关节镜辅助技术、骨外膜切口和皮质窗。在这些复杂的手术中,仔细评估每种技术的风险和益处有助于提高手术效率并降低潜在的手术发病率。本综述旨在探讨 rTEA 中固定良好的种植体的骨水泥去除技术方面的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Techniques for removal of well-fixed implants and cement in revision total elbow arthroplasty
Revision total elbow arthroplasty (rTEA) is a technically challenging procedure that is associated with high rates of surgical complications. Cement removal remains an important and difficult component of rTEA. Particularly in the case of prosthetic joint infection following TEA, failure to remove all of the cement from the index procedure results in higher rates of recurrent or persistent infection. Options for cement removal include the use of nonpowered instruments, powered instruments, ultrasonic devices, arthroscopic-assisted techniques, bone episiotomies, and cortical windows. Carefully assessing the risks and benefits of each of these techniques can provide aid in both improving surgical efficiency and potentially reducing surgical morbidity during these complex procedures. The purpose of this narrative review was to explore technical aspects of cement removal for well-fixed implants during rTEA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信