{"title":"接受新一代雄激素受体信号抑制剂治疗的转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌患者的临床疗效和风险分层","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Optimal drug selection for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) remains unclear. We therefore assessed the clinical outcomes of mHSPC treated with new-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARSIs) and identified risk factors associated with the prognosis of mHSPC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed 324 patients with mHSPC who were treated with ARSIs, including abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, between January 2018 and December 2022. In addition to assessing the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and overall survival (OS) during ARSI treatment, we investigated several potential risk factors for a poor OS in patients with mHSPC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with a ≥ 90% PSA reduction (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.58; <em>P</em> = .002) and those whose PSA declined to ≤ 0.2 ng/mL (HR: 0.22, 95% CI, 0.08-0.63; <em>P</em> = .005) showed significantly better OS than other patients. Gleason grade group 5 (GG5), presence of liver metastasis, and an LDH ≥ 250 U/L were identified as prognostic factors significantly associated with a poor OS, with HRs of 2.31 (95% CI, 1.02-5.20; <em>P</em> = .044), 7.87 (95% CI, 2.61-23.8; <em>P</em> < .001) and 3.21 (95% CI, 1.43-7.23; <em>P</em> = .005).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We identified GG5, the presence of liver metastasis, and elevated LDH at the diagnosis as significant factors predicting the OS of mHSPC, but the choice of ARSIs did not affect the prognosis. The potential prognostic impact of these markers requires further investigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":"22 5","pages":"Article 102140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes and Risk Stratification in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated With New-Generation Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Optimal drug selection for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) remains unclear. We therefore assessed the clinical outcomes of mHSPC treated with new-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARSIs) and identified risk factors associated with the prognosis of mHSPC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed 324 patients with mHSPC who were treated with ARSIs, including abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, between January 2018 and December 2022. In addition to assessing the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and overall survival (OS) during ARSI treatment, we investigated several potential risk factors for a poor OS in patients with mHSPC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with a ≥ 90% PSA reduction (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.58; <em>P</em> = .002) and those whose PSA declined to ≤ 0.2 ng/mL (HR: 0.22, 95% CI, 0.08-0.63; <em>P</em> = .005) showed significantly better OS than other patients. Gleason grade group 5 (GG5), presence of liver metastasis, and an LDH ≥ 250 U/L were identified as prognostic factors significantly associated with a poor OS, with HRs of 2.31 (95% CI, 1.02-5.20; <em>P</em> = .044), 7.87 (95% CI, 2.61-23.8; <em>P</em> < .001) and 3.21 (95% CI, 1.43-7.23; <em>P</em> = .005).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We identified GG5, the presence of liver metastasis, and elevated LDH at the diagnosis as significant factors predicting the OS of mHSPC, but the choice of ARSIs did not affect the prognosis. The potential prognostic impact of these markers requires further investigation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical genitourinary cancer\",\"volume\":\"22 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 102140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical genitourinary cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324001113\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767324001113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)的最佳药物选择仍不明确。因此,我们评估了接受新一代雄激素受体通路抑制剂(ARSIs)治疗的mHSPC的临床结果,并确定了与mHSPC预后相关的风险因素。方法我们回顾性地回顾了2018年1月至2022年12月期间接受ARSIs(包括醋酸阿比特龙、恩扎鲁胺和阿帕鲁胺)治疗的324例mHSPC患者。除了评估ARSI治疗期间的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)反应和总生存期(OS)外,我们还调查了mHSPC患者OS较差的几个潜在风险因素。结果PSA下降≥90%的患者(危险比[HR]:0.24,95%置信区间[CI],0.10-0.58;P = .002)和PSA下降≤0.2纳克/毫升的患者(HR:0.22,95%置信区间[CI],0.08-0.63;P = .005)的OS明显优于其他患者。格里森分级 5 级组 (GG5)、肝转移和 LDH ≥ 250 U/L被认为是与较差的 OS 显著相关的预后因素,其 HR 分别为 2.31 (95% CI, 1.02-5.20; P = .044)、7.87 (95% CI, 2.61-23.8; P < .001)和 3.21 (95% CI, 0.08-0.63; P = .005)。结论我们发现GG5、肝转移和诊断时LDH升高是预测mHSPC OS的重要因素,但ARSIs的选择并不影响预后。这些标志物对预后的潜在影响还需要进一步研究。
Clinical Outcomes and Risk Stratification in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated With New-Generation Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors
Background
Optimal drug selection for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) remains unclear. We therefore assessed the clinical outcomes of mHSPC treated with new-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARSIs) and identified risk factors associated with the prognosis of mHSPC.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 324 patients with mHSPC who were treated with ARSIs, including abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, between January 2018 and December 2022. In addition to assessing the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and overall survival (OS) during ARSI treatment, we investigated several potential risk factors for a poor OS in patients with mHSPC.
Results
Patients with a ≥ 90% PSA reduction (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.58; P = .002) and those whose PSA declined to ≤ 0.2 ng/mL (HR: 0.22, 95% CI, 0.08-0.63; P = .005) showed significantly better OS than other patients. Gleason grade group 5 (GG5), presence of liver metastasis, and an LDH ≥ 250 U/L were identified as prognostic factors significantly associated with a poor OS, with HRs of 2.31 (95% CI, 1.02-5.20; P = .044), 7.87 (95% CI, 2.61-23.8; P < .001) and 3.21 (95% CI, 1.43-7.23; P = .005).
Conclusion
We identified GG5, the presence of liver metastasis, and elevated LDH at the diagnosis as significant factors predicting the OS of mHSPC, but the choice of ARSIs did not affect the prognosis. The potential prognostic impact of these markers requires further investigation.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research in genitourinary cancers. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of genitourinary cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to genitourinary malignancies. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.