河岸侵蚀脆弱性评估指标:未来研究的系统文献综述

Neegar Sultana, Sagorika Rani Paul
{"title":"河岸侵蚀脆弱性评估指标:未来研究的系统文献综述","authors":"Neegar Sultana,&nbsp;Sagorika Rani Paul","doi":"10.1016/j.hydres.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the devastating nature of riverbank erosion, existing studies hardly address the complex nature of vulnerability affecting the livelihoods of erosion-prone residents. Hence, the indicators of riverbank erosion vulnerability need to be reviewed and aggregated within a specified framework to assess the vulnerability. This research performed a comprehensive literature review of the indicators of riverbank erosion vulnerability to address this knowledge gap. From 2000 to 2022, 22 journal articles were found using the PRISMA protocol. The review revealed that most studies were conducted in South Asia (82%), such as Bangladesh, India, and Nepal, and on local scales (68%), such as sub-districts, villages, unions etc. The analysis also highlighted the IPCC vulnerability framework is the most extensively used for riverbank erosion. The study identified a total of 28 vulnerability indicators of riverbank erosion. The findings reveal that there are substantial geographical and conceptual gaps in the assessment of riverbank erosion vulnerability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100615,"journal":{"name":"HydroResearch","volume":"7 ","pages":"Pages 337-359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589757824000210/pdfft?md5=52e8e575f091abd7f6fc83a40cdfb57f&pid=1-s2.0-S2589757824000210-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indicators of riverbank Erosion vulnerability assessment: A systematic literature review for future research\",\"authors\":\"Neegar Sultana,&nbsp;Sagorika Rani Paul\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hydres.2024.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite the devastating nature of riverbank erosion, existing studies hardly address the complex nature of vulnerability affecting the livelihoods of erosion-prone residents. Hence, the indicators of riverbank erosion vulnerability need to be reviewed and aggregated within a specified framework to assess the vulnerability. This research performed a comprehensive literature review of the indicators of riverbank erosion vulnerability to address this knowledge gap. From 2000 to 2022, 22 journal articles were found using the PRISMA protocol. The review revealed that most studies were conducted in South Asia (82%), such as Bangladesh, India, and Nepal, and on local scales (68%), such as sub-districts, villages, unions etc. The analysis also highlighted the IPCC vulnerability framework is the most extensively used for riverbank erosion. The study identified a total of 28 vulnerability indicators of riverbank erosion. The findings reveal that there are substantial geographical and conceptual gaps in the assessment of riverbank erosion vulnerability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HydroResearch\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 337-359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589757824000210/pdfft?md5=52e8e575f091abd7f6fc83a40cdfb57f&pid=1-s2.0-S2589757824000210-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HydroResearch\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589757824000210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HydroResearch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589757824000210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管河岸侵蚀具有破坏性,但现有研究几乎没有涉及影响易受侵蚀居民生计的脆弱性的复杂性。因此,需要对河岸侵蚀脆弱性指标进行审查,并在特定框架内进行汇总,以评估脆弱性。本研究对河岸侵蚀脆弱性指标进行了全面的文献综述,以填补这一知识空白。从 2000 年到 2022 年,使用 PRISMA 协议共找到 22 篇期刊文章。综述显示,大多数研究都是在南亚地区(82%)进行的,如孟加拉国、印度和尼泊尔,而且都是在地方范围内(68%)进行的,如县、村、社区等。分析还强调,IPCC 脆弱性框架在河岸侵蚀方面的应用最为广泛。研究共确定了 28 项河岸侵蚀脆弱性指标。研究结果表明,河岸侵蚀脆弱性评估在地理和概念上存在很大差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indicators of riverbank Erosion vulnerability assessment: A systematic literature review for future research

Despite the devastating nature of riverbank erosion, existing studies hardly address the complex nature of vulnerability affecting the livelihoods of erosion-prone residents. Hence, the indicators of riverbank erosion vulnerability need to be reviewed and aggregated within a specified framework to assess the vulnerability. This research performed a comprehensive literature review of the indicators of riverbank erosion vulnerability to address this knowledge gap. From 2000 to 2022, 22 journal articles were found using the PRISMA protocol. The review revealed that most studies were conducted in South Asia (82%), such as Bangladesh, India, and Nepal, and on local scales (68%), such as sub-districts, villages, unions etc. The analysis also highlighted the IPCC vulnerability framework is the most extensively used for riverbank erosion. The study identified a total of 28 vulnerability indicators of riverbank erosion. The findings reveal that there are substantial geographical and conceptual gaps in the assessment of riverbank erosion vulnerability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信