{"title":"在认可测试中报告测量不确定度的问题","authors":"Ricardo J. N. Bettencourt da Silva","doi":"10.1007/s00769-024-01603-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The globalisation of trade and environmental and health requirements, supported by the physical–chemical characterisation of relevant items, have promoted relevant evolutions on how test laboratories report results from their analysis. The relevance of reporting measurement results from the characterisation of these items with the measurement uncertainty is unquestionable to guarantee determinations are adequately uncertain and the objective interpretation of analytical information. The latest edition of the ISO/IEC 17025 standard, which supports the International Accreditation of test laboratories, even mentions the need to manage the impact of measurement uncertainty in the risk of false conformity assessments. Some accreditation bodies have considered this novelty and the reiteration that measurement results should be reported with the measurement uncertainty to make reporting the measurement uncertainty mandatory. This correct interpretation of the accreditation standard and society's expectations regarding the role of laboratories in the management of the most relevant interests of the community should be generalised.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"29 4","pages":"329 - 330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The issue of reporting the measurement uncertainty in accredited tests\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo J. N. Bettencourt da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00769-024-01603-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The globalisation of trade and environmental and health requirements, supported by the physical–chemical characterisation of relevant items, have promoted relevant evolutions on how test laboratories report results from their analysis. The relevance of reporting measurement results from the characterisation of these items with the measurement uncertainty is unquestionable to guarantee determinations are adequately uncertain and the objective interpretation of analytical information. The latest edition of the ISO/IEC 17025 standard, which supports the International Accreditation of test laboratories, even mentions the need to manage the impact of measurement uncertainty in the risk of false conformity assessments. Some accreditation bodies have considered this novelty and the reiteration that measurement results should be reported with the measurement uncertainty to make reporting the measurement uncertainty mandatory. This correct interpretation of the accreditation standard and society's expectations regarding the role of laboratories in the management of the most relevant interests of the community should be generalised.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"329 - 330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-024-01603-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-024-01603-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The issue of reporting the measurement uncertainty in accredited tests
The globalisation of trade and environmental and health requirements, supported by the physical–chemical characterisation of relevant items, have promoted relevant evolutions on how test laboratories report results from their analysis. The relevance of reporting measurement results from the characterisation of these items with the measurement uncertainty is unquestionable to guarantee determinations are adequately uncertain and the objective interpretation of analytical information. The latest edition of the ISO/IEC 17025 standard, which supports the International Accreditation of test laboratories, even mentions the need to manage the impact of measurement uncertainty in the risk of false conformity assessments. Some accreditation bodies have considered this novelty and the reiteration that measurement results should be reported with the measurement uncertainty to make reporting the measurement uncertainty mandatory. This correct interpretation of the accreditation standard and society's expectations regarding the role of laboratories in the management of the most relevant interests of the community should be generalised.
期刊介绍:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.