在一家三级儿童医院的电子病历中整合儿科主要潜在不当药物清单

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Seerat Kapoor Pharm.D., William A. Mabry Pharm.D., MBA, Dhyana Naik Pharm.D., Kelly S. Bobo Pharm.D., MBA
{"title":"在一家三级儿童医院的电子病历中整合儿科主要潜在不当药物清单","authors":"Seerat Kapoor Pharm.D.,&nbsp;William A. Mabry Pharm.D., MBA,&nbsp;Dhyana Naik Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Kelly S. Bobo Pharm.D., MBA","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The key potentially inappropriate drugs in pediatrics (KIDs) List raises awareness of medications and excipients that should be used cautiously in specific age groups, appropriately monitored, or avoided. This project used the KIDs List to identify opportunities to improve our clinical decision support program and adjust the medication formulary.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Our team used the Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycle to assess items and take actions that included no change, creation of an alert or task for pharmacists or providers, referral for additional study, inventory modification, and modification of dose range alerts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our initial assessment of 34 formulary items identified 10 items (29%) with the recommendations from the KIDs list in place; 72% (24/34) were referred for further study. In the preliminary phase, 15% (5/34) were submitted to pharmacy information technology (IT) to develop an alert, 24% (8/34) needed inventory modifications, 24% (8/34) required dose range alert adjustments, and 9% (3/34) were referred for additional study. Final actions included the development of six new alerts, inventory modification for nine medications, dose range checking for eight medications, and no change for 11 medications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The PDSA cycle was an effective process that allowed the team to assess each medication using a systematic approach and encouraged additional analysis when needed. We were able to compare the KIDs List recommendations to current clinical decision support parameters and make adjustments or develop new alerts within the electronic health record to match the current standard. This initiative had a team-based approach, included key stakeholders, and is replicable in other institutions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integration of the key potentially inappropriate drugs in pediatrics list within the electronic health record in a tertiary care children's hospital\",\"authors\":\"Seerat Kapoor Pharm.D.,&nbsp;William A. Mabry Pharm.D., MBA,&nbsp;Dhyana Naik Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Kelly S. Bobo Pharm.D., MBA\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jac5.1975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>The key potentially inappropriate drugs in pediatrics (KIDs) List raises awareness of medications and excipients that should be used cautiously in specific age groups, appropriately monitored, or avoided. This project used the KIDs List to identify opportunities to improve our clinical decision support program and adjust the medication formulary.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our team used the Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycle to assess items and take actions that included no change, creation of an alert or task for pharmacists or providers, referral for additional study, inventory modification, and modification of dose range alerts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our initial assessment of 34 formulary items identified 10 items (29%) with the recommendations from the KIDs list in place; 72% (24/34) were referred for further study. In the preliminary phase, 15% (5/34) were submitted to pharmacy information technology (IT) to develop an alert, 24% (8/34) needed inventory modifications, 24% (8/34) required dose range alert adjustments, and 9% (3/34) were referred for additional study. Final actions included the development of six new alerts, inventory modification for nine medications, dose range checking for eight medications, and no change for 11 medications.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The PDSA cycle was an effective process that allowed the team to assess each medication using a systematic approach and encouraged additional analysis when needed. We were able to compare the KIDs List recommendations to current clinical decision support parameters and make adjustments or develop new alerts within the electronic health record to match the current standard. This initiative had a team-based approach, included key stakeholders, and is replicable in other institutions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.1975\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.1975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿科关键潜在不当药物(KIDs)清单提高了人们对特定年龄组应慎用、适当监控或避免使用的药物和辅料的认识。我们的团队采用计划、实施、研究、行动(PDSA)循环来评估项目并采取相应行动,包括不做任何改变、为药剂师或医疗服务提供者创建提示或任务、转介进行更多研究、修改库存以及修改剂量范围提示。我们对 34 个处方药项目进行了初步评估,发现 10 个项目(29%)采纳了 KIDs 列表中的建议;72% 的项目(24/34)转介进行更多研究。在初步阶段,15%(5/34)的项目被提交至药房信息技术部门(IT)以制定警示,24%(8/34)的项目需要修改库存,24%(8/34)的项目需要调整剂量范围警示,9%(3/34)的项目被提交进行进一步研究。PDSA 循环是一个有效的流程,它允许团队使用系统的方法对每种药物进行评估,并鼓励在需要时进行额外分析。我们能够将 KID 列表建议与当前的临床决策支持参数进行比较,并在电子健康记录中进行调整或开发新的警报,以符合当前的标准。这项计划以团队为基础,包括主要利益相关者,可在其他机构推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integration of the key potentially inappropriate drugs in pediatrics list within the electronic health record in a tertiary care children's hospital

Introduction

The key potentially inappropriate drugs in pediatrics (KIDs) List raises awareness of medications and excipients that should be used cautiously in specific age groups, appropriately monitored, or avoided. This project used the KIDs List to identify opportunities to improve our clinical decision support program and adjust the medication formulary.

Methods

Our team used the Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycle to assess items and take actions that included no change, creation of an alert or task for pharmacists or providers, referral for additional study, inventory modification, and modification of dose range alerts.

Results

Our initial assessment of 34 formulary items identified 10 items (29%) with the recommendations from the KIDs list in place; 72% (24/34) were referred for further study. In the preliminary phase, 15% (5/34) were submitted to pharmacy information technology (IT) to develop an alert, 24% (8/34) needed inventory modifications, 24% (8/34) required dose range alert adjustments, and 9% (3/34) were referred for additional study. Final actions included the development of six new alerts, inventory modification for nine medications, dose range checking for eight medications, and no change for 11 medications.

Discussion

The PDSA cycle was an effective process that allowed the team to assess each medication using a systematic approach and encouraged additional analysis when needed. We were able to compare the KIDs List recommendations to current clinical decision support parameters and make adjustments or develop new alerts within the electronic health record to match the current standard. This initiative had a team-based approach, included key stakeholders, and is replicable in other institutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信