微妙但无懈可击:女权主义者冲破红楼和偏见的骄傲

Yongxu Chen
{"title":"微妙但无懈可击:女权主义者冲破红楼和偏见的骄傲","authors":"Yongxu Chen","doi":"10.61173/4gmr4619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper is dedicated to the analysis of differences and resemblances of feminism consciousness between Elizabeth Bennet and Lin Daiyu, the protagonists in Pride and Prejudice and a Dream in Red Mansions. The two works are considered pioneering greatly because female characters are of vital importance, breaking the narrative traditions. The paper, capturing this mutual transcendence, examines the two works through a feminism scope, and explores how social background influences feminism ideals by introducing the measurement “feminism applicability” for evaluation of Daiyu and Elizabeth’s respective feminism, and aims to argue that society determines, both shapes internally and affects exteriorly, applicability of feminism. By applying the comparative analysis method, the writer finally concludes that Ming-Qing and British Enlightenment triggers females’ recognition towards self, which contributes to their mutual emotionality; however, demand for rationality, females’ rights of speech and prevailing ideologies differentiate in two societies, thus their strength of need for self-judgement and autonomy is differed, resulting in different levels of feminism applicability.","PeriodicalId":294483,"journal":{"name":"Arts, Culture and Language","volume":"50 s252","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subtle but Invulnerable: Feminists Breaking through Red Chambers and Prejudiced Pride\",\"authors\":\"Yongxu Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.61173/4gmr4619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper is dedicated to the analysis of differences and resemblances of feminism consciousness between Elizabeth Bennet and Lin Daiyu, the protagonists in Pride and Prejudice and a Dream in Red Mansions. The two works are considered pioneering greatly because female characters are of vital importance, breaking the narrative traditions. The paper, capturing this mutual transcendence, examines the two works through a feminism scope, and explores how social background influences feminism ideals by introducing the measurement “feminism applicability” for evaluation of Daiyu and Elizabeth’s respective feminism, and aims to argue that society determines, both shapes internally and affects exteriorly, applicability of feminism. By applying the comparative analysis method, the writer finally concludes that Ming-Qing and British Enlightenment triggers females’ recognition towards self, which contributes to their mutual emotionality; however, demand for rationality, females’ rights of speech and prevailing ideologies differentiate in two societies, thus their strength of need for self-judgement and autonomy is differed, resulting in different levels of feminism applicability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arts, Culture and Language\",\"volume\":\"50 s252\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arts, Culture and Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61173/4gmr4619\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts, Culture and Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61173/4gmr4619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文致力于分析《傲慢与偏见》和《红楼梦》中的主人公伊丽莎白-班纳特和林黛玉在女性主义意识方面的异同。这两部作品之所以被认为具有极大的开创性,是因为女性角色的重要性,打破了叙事传统。本文抓住这一相互超越的特点,从女性主义的视角来审视两部作品,通过引入 "女性主义适用性 "这一衡量标准来评价黛玉和伊丽莎白各自的女性主义,探讨社会背景如何影响女性主义理想,旨在论证女性主义的适用性是由社会决定的,既有内在的塑造,也有外在的影响。作者运用比较分析的方法,最终得出结论:明清启蒙运动和英国启蒙运动引发了女性对自我的认同,促成了她们之间的情感共鸣;但两个社会对理性的需求、女性的话语权和主流意识形态的不同,导致了她们对自我判断和自主的需求强度不同,从而导致了女性主义适用性的不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subtle but Invulnerable: Feminists Breaking through Red Chambers and Prejudiced Pride
The paper is dedicated to the analysis of differences and resemblances of feminism consciousness between Elizabeth Bennet and Lin Daiyu, the protagonists in Pride and Prejudice and a Dream in Red Mansions. The two works are considered pioneering greatly because female characters are of vital importance, breaking the narrative traditions. The paper, capturing this mutual transcendence, examines the two works through a feminism scope, and explores how social background influences feminism ideals by introducing the measurement “feminism applicability” for evaluation of Daiyu and Elizabeth’s respective feminism, and aims to argue that society determines, both shapes internally and affects exteriorly, applicability of feminism. By applying the comparative analysis method, the writer finally concludes that Ming-Qing and British Enlightenment triggers females’ recognition towards self, which contributes to their mutual emotionality; however, demand for rationality, females’ rights of speech and prevailing ideologies differentiate in two societies, thus their strength of need for self-judgement and autonomy is differed, resulting in different levels of feminism applicability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信