英国少数民族痴呆症评估筛查工具

C. Calia, Mario A. Parra
{"title":"英国少数民族痴呆症评估筛查工具","authors":"C. Calia, Mario A. Parra","doi":"10.37349/emed.2024.00227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The present study investigated whether commonly used screening tools and assessments for dementia were culturally appropriate for older adults from ethnic minorities (EM) groups living in the UK. Methods: Both South Asian and British participants (N = 43) were assessed using the Cross-Linguistic Naming Test, Mini Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination, Visual Short-Term Memory Binding Test (VSTMBT), and the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale. Multi-Ethnic Acculturation Scale and English proficiency, measured with a self-rated scale, were associated with the four respective. No interpreters were used. Results: While members from EM significantly differed from members of the ethnic majority group in traditional neuropsychological tasks, their performance on the VSTMBT yielded results comparable to those drawn from the ethnic majority group. Complex influences seem to drive the sensitivity of traditional neuropsychological tasks to sociocultural factors. Conclusions: This is the first study that subjects the VSTMBT to investigation in EM groups. Older adults from EM showed no impact of their sociocultural backgrounds on the function assessed by this test. However, other tests widely used for the assessment of EM populations proved sensitive to the investigated sociocultural factors. Our results lend support to the suggestion that neuropsychological assessments must abandon the one-size-fits-all notion when it comes to dementia risk detection among EM groups.","PeriodicalId":507580,"journal":{"name":"Exploration of Medicine","volume":"100 S397","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening tools for dementia assessment in UK based ethnic minorities\",\"authors\":\"C. Calia, Mario A. Parra\",\"doi\":\"10.37349/emed.2024.00227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The present study investigated whether commonly used screening tools and assessments for dementia were culturally appropriate for older adults from ethnic minorities (EM) groups living in the UK. Methods: Both South Asian and British participants (N = 43) were assessed using the Cross-Linguistic Naming Test, Mini Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination, Visual Short-Term Memory Binding Test (VSTMBT), and the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale. Multi-Ethnic Acculturation Scale and English proficiency, measured with a self-rated scale, were associated with the four respective. No interpreters were used. Results: While members from EM significantly differed from members of the ethnic majority group in traditional neuropsychological tasks, their performance on the VSTMBT yielded results comparable to those drawn from the ethnic majority group. Complex influences seem to drive the sensitivity of traditional neuropsychological tasks to sociocultural factors. Conclusions: This is the first study that subjects the VSTMBT to investigation in EM groups. Older adults from EM showed no impact of their sociocultural backgrounds on the function assessed by this test. However, other tests widely used for the assessment of EM populations proved sensitive to the investigated sociocultural factors. Our results lend support to the suggestion that neuropsychological assessments must abandon the one-size-fits-all notion when it comes to dementia risk detection among EM groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploration of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"100 S397\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploration of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37349/emed.2024.00227\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploration of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37349/emed.2024.00227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究调查了常用的痴呆症筛查工具和评估方法在文化上是否适合居住在英国的少数民族(EM)老年人。研究方法:使用跨语言命名测试、迷你阿登布鲁克斯认知检查、视觉短期记忆绑定测试(VSTMBT)和罗兰通用痴呆评估量表对南亚和英国参与者(43 人)进行评估。多种族文化适应性量表和英语熟练程度(通过自评量表测量)分别与这四项指标相关。没有使用口译员。结果虽然少数族裔成员在传统神经心理学任务中与多数族裔成员有明显差异,但他们在 VSTMBT 中的表现却与多数族裔成员不相上下。传统神经心理学任务对社会文化因素的敏感性似乎受到了复杂因素的影响。结论:这是第一项在少数族裔群体中进行 VSTMBT 调查的研究。少数族裔老年人的社会文化背景对该测试所评估的功能没有影响。然而,其他广泛用于评估少数族裔群体的测试证明对所调查的社会文化因素很敏感。我们的研究结果支持了这样一种观点,即神经心理评估在检测少數族裔群体痴呆症风险时,必须摒弃 "一刀切 "的观念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screening tools for dementia assessment in UK based ethnic minorities
Aim: The present study investigated whether commonly used screening tools and assessments for dementia were culturally appropriate for older adults from ethnic minorities (EM) groups living in the UK. Methods: Both South Asian and British participants (N = 43) were assessed using the Cross-Linguistic Naming Test, Mini Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination, Visual Short-Term Memory Binding Test (VSTMBT), and the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale. Multi-Ethnic Acculturation Scale and English proficiency, measured with a self-rated scale, were associated with the four respective. No interpreters were used. Results: While members from EM significantly differed from members of the ethnic majority group in traditional neuropsychological tasks, their performance on the VSTMBT yielded results comparable to those drawn from the ethnic majority group. Complex influences seem to drive the sensitivity of traditional neuropsychological tasks to sociocultural factors. Conclusions: This is the first study that subjects the VSTMBT to investigation in EM groups. Older adults from EM showed no impact of their sociocultural backgrounds on the function assessed by this test. However, other tests widely used for the assessment of EM populations proved sensitive to the investigated sociocultural factors. Our results lend support to the suggestion that neuropsychological assessments must abandon the one-size-fits-all notion when it comes to dementia risk detection among EM groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信