耕作方式和综合养分管理对印度北方邦豇豆(Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)土壤理化性质和产量的影响

Koushik Pati, A. A. David, T. Thomas, R. Bharose, N. Toppo, I. S. Reddy
{"title":"耕作方式和综合养分管理对印度北方邦豇豆(Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)土壤理化性质和产量的影响","authors":"Koushik Pati, A. A. David, T. Thomas, R. Bharose, N. Toppo, I. S. Reddy","doi":"10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i74730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A field investigation was conducted at Central Research Farm of Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry at Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India during Zaid season of 2023. The experimental plot was laid down into a randomized block design with 9 treatments replicated thrice, consist of 3 levels each of tillage practices and RDF (0 %, 50%, 100%) and 1level of vermicompost (5 t ha -1). Results revealed that maximum bulk density (1.29 Mg m-3) and soil pH (7.10) were found in T1 (Tillage @ 0% + RDF @ 0% +VC @ 5t ha-1). The others soil parameters like porosity (55.60 %),water holding capacity (46.63 %), organic carbon (0.49 %), electrical conductivity(0.25 dS m-1), available Nitrogen (331.54 kg ha-1), available Phosphorus (28 kg ha-1), available Potassium (193.73 kg ha-1 ) were recorded maximum in T9 (Tillage @ 100% + RDF @ 100% +VC @ 5t ha-1) .Whereas best yield (150.56 q ha-1 ) was also recorded in T9 (Tillage @ 100% + RDF @ 100% +VC @ 5t ha-1) .Economic parameters like gross return (₹271008.00 ha-1) and net return (₹152323.00 ha-1) were found to be maximum in T9 (Tillage @ 100% + RDF @ 100% +VC @ 5t ha-1) and best cost benefit ratio (C: B) was recorded as (1:2.28) in treatment T9 (Tillage @ 100% + RDF @ 100% +VC @ 5t ha-1). Integrated approach of application of RDF (NPK), vermicompost along with 100% tillage practices found to be the best treatment as the soil parameters and plant growth parameters significantly affected with the different levels of nutrient and tillage practices.","PeriodicalId":14186,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science","volume":"82 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Tillage Practices and Integrated Nutrient Management on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Yield of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) at Uttar Pradesh, India\",\"authors\":\"Koushik Pati, A. A. David, T. Thomas, R. Bharose, N. Toppo, I. S. Reddy\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i74730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A field investigation was conducted at Central Research Farm of Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry at Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India during Zaid season of 2023. The experimental plot was laid down into a randomized block design with 9 treatments replicated thrice, consist of 3 levels each of tillage practices and RDF (0 %, 50%, 100%) and 1level of vermicompost (5 t ha -1). Results revealed that maximum bulk density (1.29 Mg m-3) and soil pH (7.10) were found in T1 (Tillage @ 0% + RDF @ 0% +VC @ 5t ha-1). The others soil parameters like porosity (55.60 %),water holding capacity (46.63 %), organic carbon (0.49 %), electrical conductivity(0.25 dS m-1), available Nitrogen (331.54 kg ha-1), available Phosphorus (28 kg ha-1), available Potassium (193.73 kg ha-1 ) were recorded maximum in T9 (Tillage @ 100% + RDF @ 100% +VC @ 5t ha-1) .Whereas best yield (150.56 q ha-1 ) was also recorded in T9 (Tillage @ 100% + RDF @ 100% +VC @ 5t ha-1) .Economic parameters like gross return (₹271008.00 ha-1) and net return (₹152323.00 ha-1) were found to be maximum in T9 (Tillage @ 100% + RDF @ 100% +VC @ 5t ha-1) and best cost benefit ratio (C: B) was recorded as (1:2.28) in treatment T9 (Tillage @ 100% + RDF @ 100% +VC @ 5t ha-1). Integrated approach of application of RDF (NPK), vermicompost along with 100% tillage practices found to be the best treatment as the soil parameters and plant growth parameters significantly affected with the different levels of nutrient and tillage practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"82 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i74730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i74730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2023 年扎伊德季节,在印度北方邦普拉亚格拉杰的萨姆-希金博顿农业、技术和科学大学土壤科学和农业化学系中央研究农场进行了实地调查。实验小区采用随机区组设计,共设 9 个处理,重复 3 次,包括 3 个耕作方法水平和 RDF(0%、50%、100%)以及 1 个蛭肥水平(5 吨/公顷-1)。结果显示,T1(耕作 @ 0% + RDF @ 0% +VC @ 5t ha-1)的土壤容重(1.29 Mg m-3)和土壤 pH 值(7.10)最大。其他土壤参数如孔隙度(55.60 %)、持水率(46.63 %)、有机碳(0.49 %)、电导率(0.25 dS m-1)、可利用氮(331.54 kg ha-1)、可利用磷(28 kg ha-1)、可利用钾(193.73 kg ha-1)在 T9(耕作率 @ 100 % + RDF @ 100 % +VC @ 5t ha-1)中达到最高值。毛收益(₹271008.00 ha-1)和净收益(₹152323.毛收益(₹271008.00 ha-1)和净收益(₹152323.00 ha-1)等经济指标在 T9 处理(耕作 @ 100% + RDF @ 100% +VC @ 5t ha-1)中最大,最佳成本效益比(C: B)在 T9 处理(耕作 @ 100% + RDF @ 100% +VC @ 5t ha-1)中为(1:2.28)。施用 RDF(氮磷钾)、蛭石堆肥和 100% 耕作的综合方法被认为是最佳处理,因为土壤参数和植物生长参数受到不同养分水平和耕作方法的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Tillage Practices and Integrated Nutrient Management on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Yield of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) at Uttar Pradesh, India
A field investigation was conducted at Central Research Farm of Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry at Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India during Zaid season of 2023. The experimental plot was laid down into a randomized block design with 9 treatments replicated thrice, consist of 3 levels each of tillage practices and RDF (0 %, 50%, 100%) and 1level of vermicompost (5 t ha -1). Results revealed that maximum bulk density (1.29 Mg m-3) and soil pH (7.10) were found in T1 (Tillage @ 0% + RDF @ 0% +VC @ 5t ha-1). The others soil parameters like porosity (55.60 %),water holding capacity (46.63 %), organic carbon (0.49 %), electrical conductivity(0.25 dS m-1), available Nitrogen (331.54 kg ha-1), available Phosphorus (28 kg ha-1), available Potassium (193.73 kg ha-1 ) were recorded maximum in T9 (Tillage @ 100% + RDF @ 100% +VC @ 5t ha-1) .Whereas best yield (150.56 q ha-1 ) was also recorded in T9 (Tillage @ 100% + RDF @ 100% +VC @ 5t ha-1) .Economic parameters like gross return (₹271008.00 ha-1) and net return (₹152323.00 ha-1) were found to be maximum in T9 (Tillage @ 100% + RDF @ 100% +VC @ 5t ha-1) and best cost benefit ratio (C: B) was recorded as (1:2.28) in treatment T9 (Tillage @ 100% + RDF @ 100% +VC @ 5t ha-1). Integrated approach of application of RDF (NPK), vermicompost along with 100% tillage practices found to be the best treatment as the soil parameters and plant growth parameters significantly affected with the different levels of nutrient and tillage practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信