恢复作为持有采矿营业执照的公司恢复环境功能的责任

Restorasi Sebagai, Pertanggungjawaban Pemulihan, Fungsi Lingkungan, Hidup Bagi, Perusahaan Pemegang, Izin Usaha, Jasa Pertambangan, Lingga Parama, Wisnu Aryo Dewanto, Restorasi Sebagai Pertanggungjawab, an Pemulihan, Liofa Wisnu, Aryo Dewanto
{"title":"恢复作为持有采矿营业执照的公司恢复环境功能的责任","authors":"Restorasi Sebagai, Pertanggungjawaban Pemulihan, Fungsi Lingkungan, Hidup Bagi, Perusahaan Pemegang, Izin Usaha, Jasa Pertambangan, Lingga Parama, Wisnu Aryo Dewanto, Restorasi Sebagai Pertanggungjawab, an Pemulihan, Liofa Wisnu, Aryo Dewanto","doi":"10.24123/yustika.v26i02.6023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mining is a business that operates in the exploitation of natural resources, so the potential for natural damage is something that must be faced and addressed wisely. The Law on Environmental Protection and Management has made it mandatory for every person who pollutes the environment to restore environmental functions, one of which is restoration. In summary, restoration is an effort to restore environmental functions in the form of restoring the environment to its original condition. However, the Law on Mineral and Coal Mining stipulates that if the IUP or IUPK holder uses mining services, the responsibility for mining business activities remains borne by the IUP or IUPK holder. This results in a conflict of laws, resulting in a legal vacuum that requires mining service providers to carry out restoration as an action to restore environmental functions. Based on this, this research aims to analyze whether mining service providers whose services are used by mineral and coal mining can be required to carry out restoration as a form of responsibility for restoring environmental functions. The results of this research show that the imposition of mining responsibilities on IUP or IUPK holders also has an impact on the absence of obligations on mining service providers to carry out restoration.","PeriodicalId":367058,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN","volume":" 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restorasi Sebagai Pertanggungjawaban Pemulihan Fungsi Lingkungan Hidup Bagi Perusahaan Pemegang Izin Usaha Pertambangan\",\"authors\":\"Restorasi Sebagai, Pertanggungjawaban Pemulihan, Fungsi Lingkungan, Hidup Bagi, Perusahaan Pemegang, Izin Usaha, Jasa Pertambangan, Lingga Parama, Wisnu Aryo Dewanto, Restorasi Sebagai Pertanggungjawab, an Pemulihan, Liofa Wisnu, Aryo Dewanto\",\"doi\":\"10.24123/yustika.v26i02.6023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mining is a business that operates in the exploitation of natural resources, so the potential for natural damage is something that must be faced and addressed wisely. The Law on Environmental Protection and Management has made it mandatory for every person who pollutes the environment to restore environmental functions, one of which is restoration. In summary, restoration is an effort to restore environmental functions in the form of restoring the environment to its original condition. However, the Law on Mineral and Coal Mining stipulates that if the IUP or IUPK holder uses mining services, the responsibility for mining business activities remains borne by the IUP or IUPK holder. This results in a conflict of laws, resulting in a legal vacuum that requires mining service providers to carry out restoration as an action to restore environmental functions. Based on this, this research aims to analyze whether mining service providers whose services are used by mineral and coal mining can be required to carry out restoration as a form of responsibility for restoring environmental functions. The results of this research show that the imposition of mining responsibilities on IUP or IUPK holders also has an impact on the absence of obligations on mining service providers to carry out restoration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":367058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN\",\"volume\":\" 45\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24123/yustika.v26i02.6023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24123/yustika.v26i02.6023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采矿业是一个开采自然资源的行业,因此必须明智地面对和解决可能对自然造成的破坏。环境保护和管理法》规定,每个污染环境的人都必须恢复环境功能,其中之一就是恢复。概括地说,修复就是以恢复环境原状的形式努力恢复环境功能。然而,《矿产和煤炭开采法》规定,如果 IUP 或 IUPK 持有人使用采矿服务,采矿经营活动的责任仍由 IUP 或 IUPK 持有人承担。这就造成了法律冲突,导致法律真空,要求采矿服务提供商进行恢复,以此作为恢复环境功能的行动。基于此,本研究旨在分析矿产和煤炭开采所使用的采矿服务提供商是否可以被要求进行恢复,作为恢复环境功能的一种责任形式。研究结果表明,将采矿责任强加于 IUP 或 IUPK 持有者也会对采矿服务提供商不承担恢复义务产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Restorasi Sebagai Pertanggungjawaban Pemulihan Fungsi Lingkungan Hidup Bagi Perusahaan Pemegang Izin Usaha Pertambangan
Mining is a business that operates in the exploitation of natural resources, so the potential for natural damage is something that must be faced and addressed wisely. The Law on Environmental Protection and Management has made it mandatory for every person who pollutes the environment to restore environmental functions, one of which is restoration. In summary, restoration is an effort to restore environmental functions in the form of restoring the environment to its original condition. However, the Law on Mineral and Coal Mining stipulates that if the IUP or IUPK holder uses mining services, the responsibility for mining business activities remains borne by the IUP or IUPK holder. This results in a conflict of laws, resulting in a legal vacuum that requires mining service providers to carry out restoration as an action to restore environmental functions. Based on this, this research aims to analyze whether mining service providers whose services are used by mineral and coal mining can be required to carry out restoration as a form of responsibility for restoring environmental functions. The results of this research show that the imposition of mining responsibilities on IUP or IUPK holders also has an impact on the absence of obligations on mining service providers to carry out restoration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信