绘制决策路径图:确定疑似严重感染诊断检测的干预切入点

Raasti Naseem, N. Howe, Sara Pretorius, Cameron Williams, Clare Lendrem, Philip Pallmann, E. Carrol
{"title":"绘制决策路径图:确定疑似严重感染诊断检测的干预切入点","authors":"Raasti Naseem, N. Howe, Sara Pretorius, Cameron Williams, Clare Lendrem, Philip Pallmann, E. Carrol","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13568.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background PROTECT (Platform Randomised evaluation of clinical Outcomes using novel TEChnologies to optimise antimicrobial Therapy) has brought together a team of researchers to design a platform trial to rapidly evaluate and adopt into care multiple diagnostic technologies, bringing immediate benefit to patients. Rapid diagnostic tests will be used to identify patients at risk of deterioration from severe infection, before they become critically unwell. The platform will assess their comparative clinical and cost-effectiveness relative to current standard of care. Preliminary work, conducted under a Health Technology Assessment Application Acceleration Award, provided key evidence to optimise the design of the PROTECT platform. Methods Qualitative methods which involved consulting key stakeholders in the field of serious infection addressed the key priorities. A high-level care pathway analysis focusing on serious infection in secondary care, captured the points of contact, actions, decisions, and potential outcomes associated with a patient’s care. Results Two use cases of rapid diagnostic tests for serious infection were identified; (1) in acute emergency medicine to decide on antimicrobial initiation and/or escalation of care, and (2) in hospitalised patients to monitor treatment response. Within the emergency department, clinicians believed a test would be used as an adjunct to existing standard of care and would be used to either rule-in or rule-out serious infection. The “ideal” test should be rapid, point-of-care, cheap to procure, have capacity for high usability, and ability to be performed and interpreted by all staff. Facilitators to the adoption of infection diagnostic tests is their clinical need, and the main potential barrier is poor change management and behavioural change. Conclusions Any new test should provide robust evidence of its effectiveness and have the potential to benefit the clinical pathway for patients, clinicians, and hospitals as a whole, to be considered for adoption as a new standard of care.","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping decision-making pathways: Determination of intervention entry points for diagnostic tests in suspected serious infection\",\"authors\":\"Raasti Naseem, N. Howe, Sara Pretorius, Cameron Williams, Clare Lendrem, Philip Pallmann, E. Carrol\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/nihropenres.13568.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background PROTECT (Platform Randomised evaluation of clinical Outcomes using novel TEChnologies to optimise antimicrobial Therapy) has brought together a team of researchers to design a platform trial to rapidly evaluate and adopt into care multiple diagnostic technologies, bringing immediate benefit to patients. Rapid diagnostic tests will be used to identify patients at risk of deterioration from severe infection, before they become critically unwell. The platform will assess their comparative clinical and cost-effectiveness relative to current standard of care. Preliminary work, conducted under a Health Technology Assessment Application Acceleration Award, provided key evidence to optimise the design of the PROTECT platform. Methods Qualitative methods which involved consulting key stakeholders in the field of serious infection addressed the key priorities. A high-level care pathway analysis focusing on serious infection in secondary care, captured the points of contact, actions, decisions, and potential outcomes associated with a patient’s care. Results Two use cases of rapid diagnostic tests for serious infection were identified; (1) in acute emergency medicine to decide on antimicrobial initiation and/or escalation of care, and (2) in hospitalised patients to monitor treatment response. Within the emergency department, clinicians believed a test would be used as an adjunct to existing standard of care and would be used to either rule-in or rule-out serious infection. The “ideal” test should be rapid, point-of-care, cheap to procure, have capacity for high usability, and ability to be performed and interpreted by all staff. Facilitators to the adoption of infection diagnostic tests is their clinical need, and the main potential barrier is poor change management and behavioural change. Conclusions Any new test should provide robust evidence of its effectiveness and have the potential to benefit the clinical pathway for patients, clinicians, and hospitals as a whole, to be considered for adoption as a new standard of care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NIHR open research\",\"volume\":\" 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NIHR open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13568.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13568.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 PROTECT(使用新型 TEChnologies 优化抗菌疗法的临床结果平台随机评估)汇集了一支研究团队,共同设计了一项平台试验,以快速评估和采用多种诊断技术,为患者带来立竿见影的效果。快速诊断检测将用于识别有可能因严重感染而病情恶化的患者,以免他们出现严重不适。该平台将评估这些技术与当前标准疗法的临床和成本效益比较。根据健康技术评估应用加速奖开展的初步工作为优化 PROTECT 平台的设计提供了关键证据。方法 采用定性方法,咨询严重感染领域的主要利益相关者,以确定关键优先事项。以二级护理中的严重感染为重点的高级护理路径分析捕捉了与患者护理相关的接触点、行动、决策和潜在结果。结果 确定了严重感染快速诊断检测的两个用例:(1) 急诊科,用于决定抗菌药物的使用和/或护理升级;(2) 住院患者,用于监测治疗反应。在急诊科,临床医生认为检验将作为现有标准护理的辅助手段,用于排除严重感染。理想的 "检验应该是快速的、可在医疗点进行的、采购成本低廉的、可用性强的,并且能够由所有工作人员进行操作和解释。采用感染诊断检测的促进因素是其临床需求,而主要的潜在障碍则是变革管理和行为改变不力。结论 任何新的检验方法都应提供有力的证据证明其有效性,并有可能为患者、临床医生和整个医院的临床路径带来益处,才能考虑将其作为一种新的护理标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping decision-making pathways: Determination of intervention entry points for diagnostic tests in suspected serious infection
Background PROTECT (Platform Randomised evaluation of clinical Outcomes using novel TEChnologies to optimise antimicrobial Therapy) has brought together a team of researchers to design a platform trial to rapidly evaluate and adopt into care multiple diagnostic technologies, bringing immediate benefit to patients. Rapid diagnostic tests will be used to identify patients at risk of deterioration from severe infection, before they become critically unwell. The platform will assess their comparative clinical and cost-effectiveness relative to current standard of care. Preliminary work, conducted under a Health Technology Assessment Application Acceleration Award, provided key evidence to optimise the design of the PROTECT platform. Methods Qualitative methods which involved consulting key stakeholders in the field of serious infection addressed the key priorities. A high-level care pathway analysis focusing on serious infection in secondary care, captured the points of contact, actions, decisions, and potential outcomes associated with a patient’s care. Results Two use cases of rapid diagnostic tests for serious infection were identified; (1) in acute emergency medicine to decide on antimicrobial initiation and/or escalation of care, and (2) in hospitalised patients to monitor treatment response. Within the emergency department, clinicians believed a test would be used as an adjunct to existing standard of care and would be used to either rule-in or rule-out serious infection. The “ideal” test should be rapid, point-of-care, cheap to procure, have capacity for high usability, and ability to be performed and interpreted by all staff. Facilitators to the adoption of infection diagnostic tests is their clinical need, and the main potential barrier is poor change management and behavioural change. Conclusions Any new test should provide robust evidence of its effectiveness and have the potential to benefit the clinical pathway for patients, clinicians, and hospitals as a whole, to be considered for adoption as a new standard of care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信