不同化疗方案对 65 岁以上播散性胰腺癌患者的疗效和安全性

M. Manukyan, Y. Chikhareva, I. S. Bazin, I. A. Pokataev, A. A. Tryakin
{"title":"不同化疗方案对 65 岁以上播散性胰腺癌患者的疗效和安全性","authors":"M. Manukyan, Y. Chikhareva, I. S. Bazin, I. A. Pokataev, A. A. Tryakin","doi":"10.17650/2949-5857-2024-14-2-38-47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of systemic chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) in real clinical practice.Materials and methods. The study included patients with mPC over 65 years of age who received first-line chemotherapy at the N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology for the period from 2004 to 2023. Any previous antitumor chemotherapy for mPC was an exclusion criterion. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were ORR, median progression-free survival, median OS, chemotherapy tolerability.Results. The study included 148 patients aged 65 to 86 years with mPC who received first-line chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival among the entire population was 5.2 months. One-year OS among all patients was 32 %. The 1-year OS in mFOLFIRINOX group was 43.4 % and in gemcitabine group – 19.6 %. In a subgroup analysis, median OS with combination treatment was higher than in the gemcitabine monotherapy group (median OS 8.4 months vs. 6.8 months, p = 0.009). Patients with ECOG 2–3 also benefited from combination chemotherapy. Median OS was 8.9 months versus 3.9 months in gemcitabine (p = 0.008). The frequency of an objective response with triple chemotherapy was 66.1 %. In 30.8 % of cases, grade 3–4 neutropenia developed with mFOLFIRINOX, but febrile neutropenia developed only in three patients (5.8 %). The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events was low, and these chemotherapy regimens were well tolerated.Conclusion. Conducting a triple chemotherapy regimen in elderly patients with mPC is an effective treatment option with an acceptable range of toxicity. ","PeriodicalId":509681,"journal":{"name":"Surgery and Oncology","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of different chemotherapy regimens in patients with disseminated pancreatic cancer over 65 years old\",\"authors\":\"M. Manukyan, Y. Chikhareva, I. S. Bazin, I. A. Pokataev, A. A. Tryakin\",\"doi\":\"10.17650/2949-5857-2024-14-2-38-47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of systemic chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) in real clinical practice.Materials and methods. The study included patients with mPC over 65 years of age who received first-line chemotherapy at the N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology for the period from 2004 to 2023. Any previous antitumor chemotherapy for mPC was an exclusion criterion. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were ORR, median progression-free survival, median OS, chemotherapy tolerability.Results. The study included 148 patients aged 65 to 86 years with mPC who received first-line chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival among the entire population was 5.2 months. One-year OS among all patients was 32 %. The 1-year OS in mFOLFIRINOX group was 43.4 % and in gemcitabine group – 19.6 %. In a subgroup analysis, median OS with combination treatment was higher than in the gemcitabine monotherapy group (median OS 8.4 months vs. 6.8 months, p = 0.009). Patients with ECOG 2–3 also benefited from combination chemotherapy. Median OS was 8.9 months versus 3.9 months in gemcitabine (p = 0.008). The frequency of an objective response with triple chemotherapy was 66.1 %. In 30.8 % of cases, grade 3–4 neutropenia developed with mFOLFIRINOX, but febrile neutropenia developed only in three patients (5.8 %). The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events was low, and these chemotherapy regimens were well tolerated.Conclusion. Conducting a triple chemotherapy regimen in elderly patients with mPC is an effective treatment option with an acceptable range of toxicity. \",\"PeriodicalId\":509681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery and Oncology\",\"volume\":\" 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17650/2949-5857-2024-14-2-38-47\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/2949-5857-2024-14-2-38-47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估临床实践中老年转移性胰腺癌(mPC)患者接受全身化疗的有效性和耐受性。研究对象包括在 N. N. Blokhin 国立肿瘤医学研究中心接受一线化疗的 65 岁以上转移性胰腺癌患者。Blokhin 国家肿瘤医学研究中心接受一线化疗的 65 岁以上 mPC 患者。曾接受过任何mPC抗肿瘤化疗的患者为排除标准。主要终点为1年总生存期(OS),次要终点为ORR、中位无进展生存期、中位OS、化疗耐受性。研究纳入了148名年龄在65至86岁之间、接受一线化疗的mPC患者。所有患者的中位无进展生存期为5.2个月。所有患者的一年OS为32%。mFOLFIRINOX 组的 1 年生存率为 43.4%,吉西他滨组的 1 年生存率为 19.6%。在亚组分析中,联合治疗组的中位OS高于吉西他滨单药组(中位OS为8.4个月对6.8个月,P = 0.009)。ECOG 2-3 患者也从联合化疗中获益。中位生存期为8.9个月,吉西他滨为3.9个月(P = 0.008)。三联化疗的客观反应发生率为 66.1%。使用mFOLFIRINOX时,30.8%的病例出现3-4级中性粒细胞减少症,但只有3名患者(5.8%)出现发热性中性粒细胞减少症。3-4级不良反应的发生率较低,这些化疗方案的耐受性良好。结论:对老年mPC患者实施三联化疗方案是一种有效的治疗选择,且毒性范围可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of different chemotherapy regimens in patients with disseminated pancreatic cancer over 65 years old
Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of systemic chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) in real clinical practice.Materials and methods. The study included patients with mPC over 65 years of age who received first-line chemotherapy at the N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology for the period from 2004 to 2023. Any previous antitumor chemotherapy for mPC was an exclusion criterion. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were ORR, median progression-free survival, median OS, chemotherapy tolerability.Results. The study included 148 patients aged 65 to 86 years with mPC who received first-line chemotherapy. Median progression-free survival among the entire population was 5.2 months. One-year OS among all patients was 32 %. The 1-year OS in mFOLFIRINOX group was 43.4 % and in gemcitabine group – 19.6 %. In a subgroup analysis, median OS with combination treatment was higher than in the gemcitabine monotherapy group (median OS 8.4 months vs. 6.8 months, p = 0.009). Patients with ECOG 2–3 also benefited from combination chemotherapy. Median OS was 8.9 months versus 3.9 months in gemcitabine (p = 0.008). The frequency of an objective response with triple chemotherapy was 66.1 %. In 30.8 % of cases, grade 3–4 neutropenia developed with mFOLFIRINOX, but febrile neutropenia developed only in three patients (5.8 %). The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events was low, and these chemotherapy regimens were well tolerated.Conclusion. Conducting a triple chemotherapy regimen in elderly patients with mPC is an effective treatment option with an acceptable range of toxicity. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信