生物燃料对压燃发动机燃烧和摩擦学特性的实验和数值研究

I. Temizer, Fırat Gücer
{"title":"生物燃料对压燃发动机燃烧和摩擦学特性的实验和数值研究","authors":"I. Temizer, Fırat Gücer","doi":"10.1177/09544089241258177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, the tightening of exhaust emission regulations in engines directs researchers to alternative fuel types. In this study investigated the impact of blending diesel fuel with bioethanol and diethyl-ether on combustion parameters and exhaust emissions in a single-cylinder DI (direct injection) diesel engine. Both numerical and experimental analyses were used to compare the in-cylinder pressure and heat release rate of various fuel blends. Fuel spray/temperature/equivalence changes in the cylinder for different crank angles were created for different fuel types. The analysis was examined various parameters such as in-cylinder pressure, temperature, heat release rate, mass fraction burned, fuel spray formations, and equivalence ratio at variable crank angles. Results showed that all blended fuels exhibited a decrease in in-cylinder maximum pressure, temperature, and heat release rates compared to 100% diesel fuel, with an increase in mass fraction burned. CO2 emissions of D90E10 (90% diesel fuel + 10% bioethanol), D80E20 (80% diesel fuel + 20% bioethanol), D80E10DEE10 (80% diesel fuel 10% bioethanol + 10% diethyl ether) and D85E10DEE5 (85% diesel fuel + 10% bioethanol + 5% diethyl ether) fuelled engine were decreased rates 2%, 2.9%, 5% and 3.8% compared to D100 (100%diesel fuel) operation, respectively. Also, the maximum pressure in the chamber was decreased rate 3% in D80E10DEE10 fuel operation, compared to diesel fuel. Based on FTIR (Fourier Transform Infra-Red) data, the lubricating oil analyses showed that there was no significant decline in oil performance after 110 h of operation with different fuel types. However, a closer examination of the AVL FIRE program data and the EDX (Energy Dispersive X-Ray) analysis of the first ring uncovered that the wear patterns observed on the ring while using D100 fuel were heavily influenced by temperature and pressure parameters. This was particularly noticeable when compared to blended fuels that included bioethanol.","PeriodicalId":506108,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The experimental and numerical investigation of biofuels on combustion and tribology characteristics in a compression ignition engine\",\"authors\":\"I. Temizer, Fırat Gücer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09544089241258177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Today, the tightening of exhaust emission regulations in engines directs researchers to alternative fuel types. In this study investigated the impact of blending diesel fuel with bioethanol and diethyl-ether on combustion parameters and exhaust emissions in a single-cylinder DI (direct injection) diesel engine. Both numerical and experimental analyses were used to compare the in-cylinder pressure and heat release rate of various fuel blends. Fuel spray/temperature/equivalence changes in the cylinder for different crank angles were created for different fuel types. The analysis was examined various parameters such as in-cylinder pressure, temperature, heat release rate, mass fraction burned, fuel spray formations, and equivalence ratio at variable crank angles. Results showed that all blended fuels exhibited a decrease in in-cylinder maximum pressure, temperature, and heat release rates compared to 100% diesel fuel, with an increase in mass fraction burned. CO2 emissions of D90E10 (90% diesel fuel + 10% bioethanol), D80E20 (80% diesel fuel + 20% bioethanol), D80E10DEE10 (80% diesel fuel 10% bioethanol + 10% diethyl ether) and D85E10DEE5 (85% diesel fuel + 10% bioethanol + 5% diethyl ether) fuelled engine were decreased rates 2%, 2.9%, 5% and 3.8% compared to D100 (100%diesel fuel) operation, respectively. Also, the maximum pressure in the chamber was decreased rate 3% in D80E10DEE10 fuel operation, compared to diesel fuel. Based on FTIR (Fourier Transform Infra-Red) data, the lubricating oil analyses showed that there was no significant decline in oil performance after 110 h of operation with different fuel types. However, a closer examination of the AVL FIRE program data and the EDX (Energy Dispersive X-Ray) analysis of the first ring uncovered that the wear patterns observed on the ring while using D100 fuel were heavily influenced by temperature and pressure parameters. This was particularly noticeable when compared to blended fuels that included bioethanol.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering\",\"volume\":\" 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089241258177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089241258177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,随着发动机废气排放法规的收紧,研究人员将目光投向了替代燃料类型。本研究调查了柴油与生物乙醇和二乙醚混合后对单缸 DI(直喷)柴油发动机燃烧参数和尾气排放的影响。通过数值和实验分析,比较了各种混合燃料的缸内压力和热释放率。针对不同类型的燃料,创建了不同曲柄角度下气缸内的燃料喷射/温度/等效变化。分析考察了各种参数,如不同曲柄角度下的缸内压力、温度、热释放率、燃烧质量分数、燃料喷射形式和当量比。结果表明,与 100% 柴油相比,所有混合燃料的缸内最大压力、温度和热释放率都有所下降,但燃烧的质量分数有所增加。与 D100(100% 柴油)相比,D90E10(90% 柴油+10% 生物乙醇)、D80E20(80% 柴油+20% 生物乙醇)、D80E10DEE10(80% 柴油+10% 生物乙醇+10% 二乙醚)和 D85E10DEE5(85% 柴油+10% 生物乙醇+5% 二乙醚)燃料发动机的二氧化碳排放量分别降低了 2%、2.9%、5% 和 3.8%。此外,与柴油相比,在使用 D80E10DEE10 燃料的情况下,燃烧室内的最大压力降低了 3%。根据傅立叶变换红外(FTIR)数据,润滑油分析表明,在使用不同燃料类型运行 110 小时后,润滑油的性能没有明显下降。然而,对 AVL FIRE 程序数据和第一道环的 EDX(能量色散 X 射线)分析进行仔细研究后发现,使用 D100 燃料时在环上观察到的磨损模式在很大程度上受温度和压力参数的影响。这一点与包含生物乙醇的混合燃料相比尤为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The experimental and numerical investigation of biofuels on combustion and tribology characteristics in a compression ignition engine
Today, the tightening of exhaust emission regulations in engines directs researchers to alternative fuel types. In this study investigated the impact of blending diesel fuel with bioethanol and diethyl-ether on combustion parameters and exhaust emissions in a single-cylinder DI (direct injection) diesel engine. Both numerical and experimental analyses were used to compare the in-cylinder pressure and heat release rate of various fuel blends. Fuel spray/temperature/equivalence changes in the cylinder for different crank angles were created for different fuel types. The analysis was examined various parameters such as in-cylinder pressure, temperature, heat release rate, mass fraction burned, fuel spray formations, and equivalence ratio at variable crank angles. Results showed that all blended fuels exhibited a decrease in in-cylinder maximum pressure, temperature, and heat release rates compared to 100% diesel fuel, with an increase in mass fraction burned. CO2 emissions of D90E10 (90% diesel fuel + 10% bioethanol), D80E20 (80% diesel fuel + 20% bioethanol), D80E10DEE10 (80% diesel fuel 10% bioethanol + 10% diethyl ether) and D85E10DEE5 (85% diesel fuel + 10% bioethanol + 5% diethyl ether) fuelled engine were decreased rates 2%, 2.9%, 5% and 3.8% compared to D100 (100%diesel fuel) operation, respectively. Also, the maximum pressure in the chamber was decreased rate 3% in D80E10DEE10 fuel operation, compared to diesel fuel. Based on FTIR (Fourier Transform Infra-Red) data, the lubricating oil analyses showed that there was no significant decline in oil performance after 110 h of operation with different fuel types. However, a closer examination of the AVL FIRE program data and the EDX (Energy Dispersive X-Ray) analysis of the first ring uncovered that the wear patterns observed on the ring while using D100 fuel were heavily influenced by temperature and pressure parameters. This was particularly noticeable when compared to blended fuels that included bioethanol.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信