使用 BioGlue 治疗颅骨切除术患者的炎症过程导致伤口延迟愈合:病例系列与文献综述

Methee Wongsirsiuwan
{"title":"使用 BioGlue 治疗颅骨切除术患者的炎症过程导致伤口延迟愈合:病例系列与文献综述","authors":"Methee Wongsirsiuwan","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background  BioGlue is touted as a safe and effective sealant for various surgical procedures. This article describes five cases of delayed wound healing associated with the use of BioGlue after craniectomies. Case Description  Five patients of different genders and ages who had undergone craniectomy with BioGlue were presented to our medical center with wound dehiscence and purulent discharge. The first attempt to solve this problem by incision and drainage was unsuccessful. The removal of BioGlue is necessary to eliminate these problems. Discussion  The presence of wound dehiscence and aseptic cystic contents may indicate a chronic inflammatory process following the application of BioGlue. This problem usually occurs within a few months after wound closure. For rapid intervention, it is recommended to perform an incision and drainage and remove the BioGlue. The main risk factor is directly applying BioGlue to the skin, subcutaneous tissue, or titanium material. Conclusion  Neurosurgeons should exercise caution and be aware of a possible delayed chronic inflammatory process in surgical wounds associated with the use of BioGlue as a sealant, especially when the product is used without cranial coverage or in cases where it comes into direct contact with subcutaneous tissue or titanium material. To resolve this issue quickly, BioGlue should be completely removed at the first attempt at incision and drainage.","PeriodicalId":8521,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delayed Wound Healing Resulting from Inflammatory Process in Craniectomy Patients Treated with BioGlue: A Case Series with Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Methee Wongsirsiuwan\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1787673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background  BioGlue is touted as a safe and effective sealant for various surgical procedures. This article describes five cases of delayed wound healing associated with the use of BioGlue after craniectomies. Case Description  Five patients of different genders and ages who had undergone craniectomy with BioGlue were presented to our medical center with wound dehiscence and purulent discharge. The first attempt to solve this problem by incision and drainage was unsuccessful. The removal of BioGlue is necessary to eliminate these problems. Discussion  The presence of wound dehiscence and aseptic cystic contents may indicate a chronic inflammatory process following the application of BioGlue. This problem usually occurs within a few months after wound closure. For rapid intervention, it is recommended to perform an incision and drainage and remove the BioGlue. The main risk factor is directly applying BioGlue to the skin, subcutaneous tissue, or titanium material. Conclusion  Neurosurgeons should exercise caution and be aware of a possible delayed chronic inflammatory process in surgical wounds associated with the use of BioGlue as a sealant, especially when the product is used without cranial coverage or in cases where it comes into direct contact with subcutaneous tissue or titanium material. To resolve this issue quickly, BioGlue should be completely removed at the first attempt at incision and drainage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787673\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 背景 BioGlue 被誉为用于各种外科手术的安全有效的密封剂。本文描述了五例与颅骨切除术后使用 BioGlue 相关的伤口延迟愈合病例。病例描述 五名不同性别和年龄的患者在接受了使用 BioGlue 的颅骨切除术后,因伤口开裂和脓性分泌物而来到我们的医疗中心。首次尝试通过切开引流解决这一问题,但未获成功。要解决这些问题,必须去除 BioGlue。讨论 伤口开裂和无菌囊性内容物的出现可能表明使用 BioGlue 后出现了慢性炎症过程。这种问题通常发生在伤口闭合后的几个月内。为了快速干预,建议进行切开引流并取出 BioGlue。主要的风险因素是直接将 BioGlue 涂在皮肤、皮下组织或钛材料上。结论 神经外科医生在使用 BioGlue 作为密封剂时,尤其是在未覆盖颅骨或直接接触皮下组织或钛材料的情况下使用该产品时,应谨慎行事并注意手术伤口可能出现的延迟性慢性炎症过程。为尽快解决这一问题,应在首次尝试切开引流时完全清除 BioGlue。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Delayed Wound Healing Resulting from Inflammatory Process in Craniectomy Patients Treated with BioGlue: A Case Series with Literature Review
Abstract Background  BioGlue is touted as a safe and effective sealant for various surgical procedures. This article describes five cases of delayed wound healing associated with the use of BioGlue after craniectomies. Case Description  Five patients of different genders and ages who had undergone craniectomy with BioGlue were presented to our medical center with wound dehiscence and purulent discharge. The first attempt to solve this problem by incision and drainage was unsuccessful. The removal of BioGlue is necessary to eliminate these problems. Discussion  The presence of wound dehiscence and aseptic cystic contents may indicate a chronic inflammatory process following the application of BioGlue. This problem usually occurs within a few months after wound closure. For rapid intervention, it is recommended to perform an incision and drainage and remove the BioGlue. The main risk factor is directly applying BioGlue to the skin, subcutaneous tissue, or titanium material. Conclusion  Neurosurgeons should exercise caution and be aware of a possible delayed chronic inflammatory process in surgical wounds associated with the use of BioGlue as a sealant, especially when the product is used without cranial coverage or in cases where it comes into direct contact with subcutaneous tissue or titanium material. To resolve this issue quickly, BioGlue should be completely removed at the first attempt at incision and drainage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信