不同临界值的 50 克葡萄糖挑战试验结合临床风险因素在预测妊娠糖尿病诊断中的诊断价值

Q4 Medicine
Amontis Chaimongkolpipob, Supapen Lertvutivivat, T. Nanthakomon, C. Tanprasertkul, Banthisa Somboon, C. Somprasit
{"title":"不同临界值的 50 克葡萄糖挑战试验结合临床风险因素在预测妊娠糖尿病诊断中的诊断价值","authors":"Amontis Chaimongkolpipob, Supapen Lertvutivivat, T. Nanthakomon, C. Tanprasertkul, Banthisa Somboon, C. Somprasit","doi":"10.31584/jhsmr.20241063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic precision of the 50-gram glucose challenge test (50-g GCT) at various levels for the detection of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and to examine its association with clinical risk indicators. Material and Methods: At Thammasat University Hospital, our retrospective cohort comprised 1,197 pregnant women screened using the 50-g GCT based on risk factors, including a family history of GDM, obesity, and other factors. Out of these, 219 tested positive, with 83 (37.9%) diagnosed with GDM and 136 (62.1%) without GDM. Comprehensive data including baseline characteristics, as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes, were compiled. We assessed the correlations between clinical risk factors and 50-g GCT values to ascertain GDM. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for various cut-off levels were determined. Results: The best cutoff for the 50-g GCT for GDM diagnosis was ≥220 mg/dL with 100% PPV without adding clinical risk. The PPVs reached 75% and 100%, respectively, when combined with maternal age ≥35 years at 50-g GCT thresholds of ≥210 mg/dL and ≥220 mg/dL. A history of diabetes in the family combined with a 50-g GCT provided 100% PPV at 200 mg/dL. Conclusion: A 50-g GCT cut-off value of ≥220mg/dL is proposed for a definitive GDM diagnosis in certain circumstances, negating the need for this additional test. When a pregnant woman has a family history of diabetes, the 50-g GCT cut-off of 200 mg/dL could be a promising marker for identifying GDM. ","PeriodicalId":36211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Diagnostic Value of the 50-Gram Glucose Challenge Test at Various Cut-off Levels Combined with Clinical Risk Factors in Predicting the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus\",\"authors\":\"Amontis Chaimongkolpipob, Supapen Lertvutivivat, T. Nanthakomon, C. Tanprasertkul, Banthisa Somboon, C. Somprasit\",\"doi\":\"10.31584/jhsmr.20241063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic precision of the 50-gram glucose challenge test (50-g GCT) at various levels for the detection of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and to examine its association with clinical risk indicators. Material and Methods: At Thammasat University Hospital, our retrospective cohort comprised 1,197 pregnant women screened using the 50-g GCT based on risk factors, including a family history of GDM, obesity, and other factors. Out of these, 219 tested positive, with 83 (37.9%) diagnosed with GDM and 136 (62.1%) without GDM. Comprehensive data including baseline characteristics, as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes, were compiled. We assessed the correlations between clinical risk factors and 50-g GCT values to ascertain GDM. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for various cut-off levels were determined. Results: The best cutoff for the 50-g GCT for GDM diagnosis was ≥220 mg/dL with 100% PPV without adding clinical risk. The PPVs reached 75% and 100%, respectively, when combined with maternal age ≥35 years at 50-g GCT thresholds of ≥210 mg/dL and ≥220 mg/dL. A history of diabetes in the family combined with a 50-g GCT provided 100% PPV at 200 mg/dL. Conclusion: A 50-g GCT cut-off value of ≥220mg/dL is proposed for a definitive GDM diagnosis in certain circumstances, negating the need for this additional test. When a pregnant woman has a family history of diabetes, the 50-g GCT cut-off of 200 mg/dL could be a promising marker for identifying GDM. \",\"PeriodicalId\":36211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20241063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20241063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估不同水平的 50 克葡萄糖挑战试验(50-g GCT)对检测妊娠糖尿病(GDM)的诊断精确度,并研究其与临床风险指标的关联。材料与方法在 Thammasat 大学医院,我们的回顾性队列由 1,197 名孕妇组成,她们根据 GDM 家族史、肥胖等风险因素接受了 50-g GCT 筛查。其中 219 人检测结果呈阳性,83 人(37.9%)确诊为 GDM,136 人(62.1%)未确诊为 GDM。我们收集了包括基线特征、孕产妇和新生儿结局在内的全面数据。我们评估了临床风险因素与 50-g GCT 值之间的相关性,以确定 GDM。确定了不同临界值的阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。结果显示诊断 GDM 的 50-g GCT 最佳临界值为≥220 mg/dL,PPV 为 100%,且不增加临床风险。在 50-g GCT 临界值≥210 毫克/分升和≥220 毫克/分升时,结合产妇年龄≥35 岁,PPV 分别达到 75% 和 100%。在 200 mg/dL 时,家族糖尿病史结合 50-g GCT 可提供 100% 的 PPV。结论在某些情况下,50-g GCT 的临界值≥220mg/dL 可用于明确诊断 GDM,从而无需进行额外的检测。当孕妇有糖尿病家族史时,50 克 GCT 临界值为 200 毫克/分升可能是鉴别 GDM 的一个有前途的标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Diagnostic Value of the 50-Gram Glucose Challenge Test at Various Cut-off Levels Combined with Clinical Risk Factors in Predicting the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic precision of the 50-gram glucose challenge test (50-g GCT) at various levels for the detection of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and to examine its association with clinical risk indicators. Material and Methods: At Thammasat University Hospital, our retrospective cohort comprised 1,197 pregnant women screened using the 50-g GCT based on risk factors, including a family history of GDM, obesity, and other factors. Out of these, 219 tested positive, with 83 (37.9%) diagnosed with GDM and 136 (62.1%) without GDM. Comprehensive data including baseline characteristics, as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes, were compiled. We assessed the correlations between clinical risk factors and 50-g GCT values to ascertain GDM. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for various cut-off levels were determined. Results: The best cutoff for the 50-g GCT for GDM diagnosis was ≥220 mg/dL with 100% PPV without adding clinical risk. The PPVs reached 75% and 100%, respectively, when combined with maternal age ≥35 years at 50-g GCT thresholds of ≥210 mg/dL and ≥220 mg/dL. A history of diabetes in the family combined with a 50-g GCT provided 100% PPV at 200 mg/dL. Conclusion: A 50-g GCT cut-off value of ≥220mg/dL is proposed for a definitive GDM diagnosis in certain circumstances, negating the need for this additional test. When a pregnant woman has a family history of diabetes, the 50-g GCT cut-off of 200 mg/dL could be a promising marker for identifying GDM. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信