与对照组相比,I 型糖尿病儿童主动脉弹性的变化

Q3 Medicine
N. Noori, Alireza Teimouri, Ali Salimi Asl, S. Rajaei
{"title":"与对照组相比,I 型糖尿病儿童主动脉弹性的变化","authors":"N. Noori, Alireza Teimouri, Ali Salimi Asl, S. Rajaei","doi":"10.5812/jcp-145187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Arterial stiffness is recognized as a critical indicator of cardiac disorders. Objectives: This study aimed to compare aortic stiffening between children with type I diabetes mellitus (DMTI) and healthy children. Methods: This case-control study included 192 children, with 96 individuals in each group of DMTI and healthy controls. The diameter of the aorta in systole and diastole was measured using M-mode echocardiography. Aortic elasticity measures were assessed, including aortic strain, aortic stiffness beta index (ASβI), arterial distensibility (AD), and pressure strain elastic modulus. Data were analyzed using SPSS 20, with a significance level set at P < 0.05. Results: The participants had a mean age of 10.87 ± 3.46 years in the DMTI group and 10.77 ± 2.82 years in the control group (P = 0.579). Diastolic (P = 0.005) and systolic (P < 0.001) aortic diameters were significantly higher in children with DMTI. ASβI (12.70 ± 15.15 vs. 8.77 ± 17.46, P < 0.001) and pressure strain elastic modulus (8.92 ± 12.03 vs. 7.24 ± 14.34, P = 0.030) appeared to be higher in healthy children, while AD (0.08 ± 0.06 vs. 0.13 ± 0.09, P < 0.001) and aortic strain (7.78 ± 6.32 vs. 11.98 ± 9.1, P < 0.001) showed a significant lower amount in children with DMTI. However, no significant differences were shown in the elasticity parameters based on hemoglobin A1c levels or duration of diabetes (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Children with DMTI exhibited higher ASβI and pressure strain elastic modulus, as well as lower aortic strain and AD, compared to healthy children. The type of diabetes control and duration of diabetes did not significantly affect the stiffening parameters in children with DMTI.","PeriodicalId":37929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aortic Elasticity Changes in Children with Type I Diabetes Mellitus Compared to Controls\",\"authors\":\"N. Noori, Alireza Teimouri, Ali Salimi Asl, S. Rajaei\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/jcp-145187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Arterial stiffness is recognized as a critical indicator of cardiac disorders. Objectives: This study aimed to compare aortic stiffening between children with type I diabetes mellitus (DMTI) and healthy children. Methods: This case-control study included 192 children, with 96 individuals in each group of DMTI and healthy controls. The diameter of the aorta in systole and diastole was measured using M-mode echocardiography. Aortic elasticity measures were assessed, including aortic strain, aortic stiffness beta index (ASβI), arterial distensibility (AD), and pressure strain elastic modulus. Data were analyzed using SPSS 20, with a significance level set at P < 0.05. Results: The participants had a mean age of 10.87 ± 3.46 years in the DMTI group and 10.77 ± 2.82 years in the control group (P = 0.579). Diastolic (P = 0.005) and systolic (P < 0.001) aortic diameters were significantly higher in children with DMTI. ASβI (12.70 ± 15.15 vs. 8.77 ± 17.46, P < 0.001) and pressure strain elastic modulus (8.92 ± 12.03 vs. 7.24 ± 14.34, P = 0.030) appeared to be higher in healthy children, while AD (0.08 ± 0.06 vs. 0.13 ± 0.09, P < 0.001) and aortic strain (7.78 ± 6.32 vs. 11.98 ± 9.1, P < 0.001) showed a significant lower amount in children with DMTI. However, no significant differences were shown in the elasticity parameters based on hemoglobin A1c levels or duration of diabetes (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Children with DMTI exhibited higher ASβI and pressure strain elastic modulus, as well as lower aortic strain and AD, compared to healthy children. The type of diabetes control and duration of diabetes did not significantly affect the stiffening parameters in children with DMTI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/jcp-145187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jcp-145187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:动脉僵化被认为是心脏疾病的一个重要指标。研究目的本研究旨在比较 I 型糖尿病(DMTI)儿童和健康儿童的主动脉僵化情况。研究方法这项病例对照研究包括 192 名儿童,DMTI 和健康对照组各 96 人。采用 M 型超声心动图测量主动脉收缩期和舒张期的直径。评估了主动脉弹性指标,包括主动脉应变、主动脉僵硬度β指数(ASβI)、动脉舒张性(AD)和压力应变弹性模量。数据使用 SPSS 20 进行分析,显著性水平设定为 P <0.05。结果DMTI 组参与者的平均年龄为(10.87 ± 3.46)岁,对照组参与者的平均年龄为(10.77 ± 2.82)岁(P = 0.579)。DMTI患儿的主动脉舒张径(P = 0.005)和收缩径(P < 0.001)明显高于对照组。健康儿童的 ASβI(12.70 ± 15.15 vs. 8.77 ± 17.46,P < 0.001)和压力应变弹性模量(8.92 ± 12.03 vs. 7.24 ± 14.34,P = 0.030)似乎更高,而 AD(0.08 ± 0.06 vs. 0.13 ± 0.09,P < 0.001)和主动脉应变(7.78 ± 6.32 vs. 11.98 ± 9.1,P < 0.001)在 DMTI 患儿中明显较低。然而,根据血红蛋白 A1c 水平或糖尿病病程,弹性参数没有明显差异(P > 0.05)。结论:与健康儿童相比,DMTI患儿表现出更高的ASβI和压力应变弹性模量,以及更低的主动脉应变和AD。糖尿病控制类型和糖尿病持续时间对DMTI患儿的僵化参数没有明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aortic Elasticity Changes in Children with Type I Diabetes Mellitus Compared to Controls
Background: Arterial stiffness is recognized as a critical indicator of cardiac disorders. Objectives: This study aimed to compare aortic stiffening between children with type I diabetes mellitus (DMTI) and healthy children. Methods: This case-control study included 192 children, with 96 individuals in each group of DMTI and healthy controls. The diameter of the aorta in systole and diastole was measured using M-mode echocardiography. Aortic elasticity measures were assessed, including aortic strain, aortic stiffness beta index (ASβI), arterial distensibility (AD), and pressure strain elastic modulus. Data were analyzed using SPSS 20, with a significance level set at P < 0.05. Results: The participants had a mean age of 10.87 ± 3.46 years in the DMTI group and 10.77 ± 2.82 years in the control group (P = 0.579). Diastolic (P = 0.005) and systolic (P < 0.001) aortic diameters were significantly higher in children with DMTI. ASβI (12.70 ± 15.15 vs. 8.77 ± 17.46, P < 0.001) and pressure strain elastic modulus (8.92 ± 12.03 vs. 7.24 ± 14.34, P = 0.030) appeared to be higher in healthy children, while AD (0.08 ± 0.06 vs. 0.13 ± 0.09, P < 0.001) and aortic strain (7.78 ± 6.32 vs. 11.98 ± 9.1, P < 0.001) showed a significant lower amount in children with DMTI. However, no significant differences were shown in the elasticity parameters based on hemoglobin A1c levels or duration of diabetes (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Children with DMTI exhibited higher ASβI and pressure strain elastic modulus, as well as lower aortic strain and AD, compared to healthy children. The type of diabetes control and duration of diabetes did not significantly affect the stiffening parameters in children with DMTI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics
Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics is the official publication of Iranian Society of Pediatrics (ISP) and a peer-reviewed medical journal which is published quarterly. It is informative for all practicing pediatrics including general medical profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信