单人病房设计对重症监护病房院内感染发生率的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析

Zheng Zhang, Xiaojiao Tan, Haiqing Shi, Jia Zhao, Huan Zhang, Jianbo Li, Xuelian Liao
{"title":"单人病房设计对重症监护病房院内感染发生率的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Zheng Zhang, Xiaojiao Tan, Haiqing Shi, Jia Zhao, Huan Zhang, Jianbo Li, Xuelian Liao","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1421055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies have yielded varying conclusions regarding the impact of single-patient room design on nosocomial infection in the intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to examine the impact of ICU single-patient room design on infection control.We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, and CBM databases from inception to October 2023, without language restrictions. We included observational cohort and quasi-experimental studies assessing the effect of single- versus multi-patient rooms on infection control in the ICU. Outcomes measured included the nosocomial infection rate, incidence density of nosocomial infection, nosocomial colonization and infection rate, acquisition rate of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), and nosocomial bacteremia rate. The choice of effect model was determined by heterogeneity.Our final analysis incorporated 12 studies involving 12,719 patients. Compared with multi-patient rooms in the ICU, single-patient rooms demonstrated a significant benefit in reducing the nosocomial infection rate (odds ratio [OR]: 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59, 0.79; p < 0.00001). Analysis based on nosocomial infection incidence density revealed a statistically significant reduction in single-patient rooms (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.92; p = 0.02). Single-patient rooms were associated with a marked decrease in nosocomial colonization and infection rate (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.62; p < 0.00001). Furthermore, patients in single-patient rooms experienced lower nosocomial bacteremia rate (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.89; p = 0.002) and lower acquisition rate of MDROs (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.73; p = 0.002) than those in multi-patient rooms.Implementation of single-patient rooms represents an effective strategy for reducing nosocomial infections in the ICU.https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/).","PeriodicalId":502302,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":" 693","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of single-patient room design on the incidence of nosocomial infection in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Zheng Zhang, Xiaojiao Tan, Haiqing Shi, Jia Zhao, Huan Zhang, Jianbo Li, Xuelian Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmed.2024.1421055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previous studies have yielded varying conclusions regarding the impact of single-patient room design on nosocomial infection in the intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to examine the impact of ICU single-patient room design on infection control.We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, and CBM databases from inception to October 2023, without language restrictions. We included observational cohort and quasi-experimental studies assessing the effect of single- versus multi-patient rooms on infection control in the ICU. Outcomes measured included the nosocomial infection rate, incidence density of nosocomial infection, nosocomial colonization and infection rate, acquisition rate of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), and nosocomial bacteremia rate. The choice of effect model was determined by heterogeneity.Our final analysis incorporated 12 studies involving 12,719 patients. Compared with multi-patient rooms in the ICU, single-patient rooms demonstrated a significant benefit in reducing the nosocomial infection rate (odds ratio [OR]: 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59, 0.79; p < 0.00001). Analysis based on nosocomial infection incidence density revealed a statistically significant reduction in single-patient rooms (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.92; p = 0.02). Single-patient rooms were associated with a marked decrease in nosocomial colonization and infection rate (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.62; p < 0.00001). Furthermore, patients in single-patient rooms experienced lower nosocomial bacteremia rate (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.89; p = 0.002) and lower acquisition rate of MDROs (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.73; p = 0.002) than those in multi-patient rooms.Implementation of single-patient rooms represents an effective strategy for reducing nosocomial infections in the ICU.https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/).\",\"PeriodicalId\":502302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" 693\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1421055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1421055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于单人病房设计对重症监护病房(ICU)内院内感染的影响,以往的研究得出了不同的结论。我们对 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、CNKI、万方数据和 CBM 数据库进行了全面检索,检索时间从开始到 2023 年 10 月,没有语言限制。我们纳入了评估单人病房与多人病房对 ICU 感染控制影响的观察性队列研究和准实验研究。衡量的结果包括院内感染率、院内感染发病密度、院内定植和感染率、耐多药菌(MDROs)感染率以及院内菌血症率。我们的最终分析纳入了 12 项研究,涉及 12,719 名患者。与重症监护室中的多病种病房相比,单病种病房在降低鼻疽感染率方面具有显著优势(几率比 [OR]:0.68;95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.59, 0.79; p < 0.00001).根据鼻疽感染发病密度进行的分析表明,单人病房的鼻疽感染率有显著降低(OR:0.64;95% 置信区间[CI]:0.44,0.92;P = 0.02)。单人病房与非病原菌定植和感染率的明显降低有关(OR:0.44;95% CI:0.32,0.62;P <0.00001)。此外,与多病种病房相比,单病种病房患者的院内菌血症发生率更低(OR:0.73;95% CI:0.59,0.89;P = 0.002),MDROs 感染率更低(OR:0.41;95% CI:0.23,0.73;P = 0.002)。单病种病房的实施是减少重症监护病房院内感染的有效策略。https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of single-patient room design on the incidence of nosocomial infection in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Previous studies have yielded varying conclusions regarding the impact of single-patient room design on nosocomial infection in the intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to examine the impact of ICU single-patient room design on infection control.We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, and CBM databases from inception to October 2023, without language restrictions. We included observational cohort and quasi-experimental studies assessing the effect of single- versus multi-patient rooms on infection control in the ICU. Outcomes measured included the nosocomial infection rate, incidence density of nosocomial infection, nosocomial colonization and infection rate, acquisition rate of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), and nosocomial bacteremia rate. The choice of effect model was determined by heterogeneity.Our final analysis incorporated 12 studies involving 12,719 patients. Compared with multi-patient rooms in the ICU, single-patient rooms demonstrated a significant benefit in reducing the nosocomial infection rate (odds ratio [OR]: 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59, 0.79; p < 0.00001). Analysis based on nosocomial infection incidence density revealed a statistically significant reduction in single-patient rooms (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.92; p = 0.02). Single-patient rooms were associated with a marked decrease in nosocomial colonization and infection rate (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.62; p < 0.00001). Furthermore, patients in single-patient rooms experienced lower nosocomial bacteremia rate (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.89; p = 0.002) and lower acquisition rate of MDROs (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.73; p = 0.002) than those in multi-patient rooms.Implementation of single-patient rooms represents an effective strategy for reducing nosocomial infections in the ICU.https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信