快讯:利用经济激励机制影响基层医疗机构的抗生素处方行为

IF 4.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Salar Ghamat, Mojtaba Araghi, Lauren E. Cipriano, Michael Silverman
{"title":"快讯:利用经济激励机制影响基层医疗机构的抗生素处方行为","authors":"Salar Ghamat, Mojtaba Araghi, Lauren E. Cipriano, Michael Silverman","doi":"10.1177/10591478241264022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antibiotic resistance is an ongoing public health crisis fueled by overuse and misuse of antibiotics. The goal of this paper is to examine the impact of action-based incentive payments on reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions in primary care, where thirty to fifty percent of antibiotic prescriptions are inappropriate. Various financial incentive programs to reduce the rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions have been implemented and studied empirically. However, there have not been analytical studies to evaluate payment model contract design features and the potential for payment models to impact diagnosis decision making. We develop a stylized physician compensation model to study the interaction between a payer and a provider. The payer offers a payment contract, with a bonus tied to the prescription, to maximize social welfare, considering total costs of providing care and social harm from antibiotic resistance. Given the contract offered and their own opportunity cost associated with factors such as fear of misdiagnosis and time spent explaining to patients why antibiotics are not indicated, the provider chooses whether or not to prescribe antibiotics to patients for whom antibiotics are not clinically indicated. We consider four cases: when diagnostic accuracy relies on symptom presentation vs. additional diagnostic testing and when the opportunity cost of not prescribing antibiotics is public vs. private information of the provider. When there is no information asymmetry, an action-based incentive payment can coordinate care and achieve the first-best policy, decreasing the rate of inappropriate prescribing, even when incentive payments can affect the diagnosis behavior. However, when the diagnosis depends on additional testing, the first-best policy results in fewer inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions, when the test has high specificity. Therefore, when an accurate technical diagnostic is available, a simple to implement action-based incentive payment can be effective in reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. In the realistic setting where the provider’s opportunity cost is private information, an action-based incentive payment cannot eliminate inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. In these settings, the introduction of point of care diagnostics to aid in objective diagnostic criteria will reduce the unintended consequences of the contract.","PeriodicalId":20623,"journal":{"name":"Production and Operations Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: Influencing Primary Care Antibiotic Prescription Behavior Using Financial Incentives\",\"authors\":\"Salar Ghamat, Mojtaba Araghi, Lauren E. Cipriano, Michael Silverman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10591478241264022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Antibiotic resistance is an ongoing public health crisis fueled by overuse and misuse of antibiotics. The goal of this paper is to examine the impact of action-based incentive payments on reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions in primary care, where thirty to fifty percent of antibiotic prescriptions are inappropriate. Various financial incentive programs to reduce the rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions have been implemented and studied empirically. However, there have not been analytical studies to evaluate payment model contract design features and the potential for payment models to impact diagnosis decision making. We develop a stylized physician compensation model to study the interaction between a payer and a provider. The payer offers a payment contract, with a bonus tied to the prescription, to maximize social welfare, considering total costs of providing care and social harm from antibiotic resistance. Given the contract offered and their own opportunity cost associated with factors such as fear of misdiagnosis and time spent explaining to patients why antibiotics are not indicated, the provider chooses whether or not to prescribe antibiotics to patients for whom antibiotics are not clinically indicated. We consider four cases: when diagnostic accuracy relies on symptom presentation vs. additional diagnostic testing and when the opportunity cost of not prescribing antibiotics is public vs. private information of the provider. When there is no information asymmetry, an action-based incentive payment can coordinate care and achieve the first-best policy, decreasing the rate of inappropriate prescribing, even when incentive payments can affect the diagnosis behavior. However, when the diagnosis depends on additional testing, the first-best policy results in fewer inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions, when the test has high specificity. Therefore, when an accurate technical diagnostic is available, a simple to implement action-based incentive payment can be effective in reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. In the realistic setting where the provider’s opportunity cost is private information, an action-based incentive payment cannot eliminate inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. In these settings, the introduction of point of care diagnostics to aid in objective diagnostic criteria will reduce the unintended consequences of the contract.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Production and Operations Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Production and Operations Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478241264022\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production and Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478241264022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗生素耐药性是因过度使用和滥用抗生素而引发的持续性公共卫生危机。本文旨在研究以行动为基础的激励措施对减少初级医疗中不适当抗生素处方的影响,因为初级医疗中30%到50%的抗生素处方是不适当的。各种旨在降低抗生素不当处方率的经济激励项目已经实施并进行了实证研究。然而,目前还没有分析研究来评估支付模式合同设计的特点以及支付模式影响诊断决策的潜力。我们建立了一个风格化的医生薪酬模型,以研究支付方和提供方之间的互动。考虑到提供医疗服务的总成本和抗生素耐药性造成的社会危害,支付方提供了一份与处方挂钩的支付合同,以实现社会福利最大化。考虑到所提供的合同以及医疗服务提供者自身的机会成本,如担心误诊以及花费时间向患者解释为什么不适合使用抗生素等因素,医疗服务提供者会选择是否向临床上不适合使用抗生素的患者开具抗生素处方。我们考虑了四种情况:当诊断准确性依赖于症状表现与额外诊断检测时,以及当不开具抗生素的机会成本是医疗服务提供者的公开信息与私人信息时。在不存在信息不对称的情况下,基于行动的激励支付可以协调医疗服务,实现最优政策,降低不当处方率,即使激励支付会影响诊断行为。然而,当诊断依赖于额外的检测时,当检测具有高特异性时,第一最优政策会导致更少的不适当抗生素处方。因此,当有了准确的技术诊断时,以行动为基础的简单激励措施可以有效减少不适当的抗生素处方。在现实环境中,医疗服务提供者的机会成本是私人信息,因此以行动为基础的激励措施无法消除不恰当的抗生素处方。在这种情况下,引入医疗点诊断来帮助制定客观的诊断标准将减少合同的意外后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EXPRESS: Influencing Primary Care Antibiotic Prescription Behavior Using Financial Incentives
Antibiotic resistance is an ongoing public health crisis fueled by overuse and misuse of antibiotics. The goal of this paper is to examine the impact of action-based incentive payments on reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions in primary care, where thirty to fifty percent of antibiotic prescriptions are inappropriate. Various financial incentive programs to reduce the rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions have been implemented and studied empirically. However, there have not been analytical studies to evaluate payment model contract design features and the potential for payment models to impact diagnosis decision making. We develop a stylized physician compensation model to study the interaction between a payer and a provider. The payer offers a payment contract, with a bonus tied to the prescription, to maximize social welfare, considering total costs of providing care and social harm from antibiotic resistance. Given the contract offered and their own opportunity cost associated with factors such as fear of misdiagnosis and time spent explaining to patients why antibiotics are not indicated, the provider chooses whether or not to prescribe antibiotics to patients for whom antibiotics are not clinically indicated. We consider four cases: when diagnostic accuracy relies on symptom presentation vs. additional diagnostic testing and when the opportunity cost of not prescribing antibiotics is public vs. private information of the provider. When there is no information asymmetry, an action-based incentive payment can coordinate care and achieve the first-best policy, decreasing the rate of inappropriate prescribing, even when incentive payments can affect the diagnosis behavior. However, when the diagnosis depends on additional testing, the first-best policy results in fewer inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions, when the test has high specificity. Therefore, when an accurate technical diagnostic is available, a simple to implement action-based incentive payment can be effective in reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. In the realistic setting where the provider’s opportunity cost is private information, an action-based incentive payment cannot eliminate inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. In these settings, the introduction of point of care diagnostics to aid in objective diagnostic criteria will reduce the unintended consequences of the contract.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Production and Operations Management
Production and Operations Management 管理科学-工程:制造
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.00%
发文量
278
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: The mission of Production and Operations Management is to serve as the flagship research journal in operations management in manufacturing and services. The journal publishes scientific research into the problems, interest, and concerns of managers who manage product and process design, operations, and supply chains. It covers all topics in product and process design, operations, and supply chain management and welcomes papers using any research paradigm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信