{"title":"关于人力的 2022 年第 02 号政府代法条例(Perpu)颁布后雇佣协议的法律地位","authors":"Evanto Pandora Manalu, Siti Hajati Hoesin, Bangun Pandapotan Hutajulu, Rinaldi Agusta Fahlevie, Athil Khaleel Farhan","doi":"10.33506/js.v10i3.2420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The government has replaced Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation, eliminating derivative provisions from Law Number 11 of 2020 on Employment and citing the principles of Legal Certainty and Protection. The terms of employment contracts are predominantly governed by Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower, with specific provisions from Law Number 11 of 2020 remaining intact, such as the conversion from Fixed-Term Work Agreements/ Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT) to Permanent Work Agreements/Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWTT). Meanwhile, Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021 has been rescinded by the newly implemented Regulation, posing challenges for legal status adjustments in district courts. This investigation aims to scrutinize and elucidate the execution of converting PKWT to PKWTT before enacting the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu) and the Omnibus Law. Subsequently, the aim is to explore and clarify the conversion of fixed-term work contracts such as PKWT into permanent work contracts such as PKWTT following the implementation of the Perppu. This study adopts a normative/doctrinal approach. The consulted literature encompasses various legal documents, including Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021. Then, it was found that the significance of regulations concerning the PKWT to PKWTT conversion was underscored in offering clarity to workers in their daily tasks. The Manpower Law imposes restrictions on work agreements with employees, mandating written contracts in Indonesian and prohibiting multiple extensions beyond the stipulated limit.","PeriodicalId":477047,"journal":{"name":"Justisi","volume":"119 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Position of Employment Agreement after the Enactment of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perpu) Number 02 of 2022 Concerning Manpower\",\"authors\":\"Evanto Pandora Manalu, Siti Hajati Hoesin, Bangun Pandapotan Hutajulu, Rinaldi Agusta Fahlevie, Athil Khaleel Farhan\",\"doi\":\"10.33506/js.v10i3.2420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The government has replaced Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation, eliminating derivative provisions from Law Number 11 of 2020 on Employment and citing the principles of Legal Certainty and Protection. The terms of employment contracts are predominantly governed by Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower, with specific provisions from Law Number 11 of 2020 remaining intact, such as the conversion from Fixed-Term Work Agreements/ Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT) to Permanent Work Agreements/Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWTT). Meanwhile, Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021 has been rescinded by the newly implemented Regulation, posing challenges for legal status adjustments in district courts. This investigation aims to scrutinize and elucidate the execution of converting PKWT to PKWTT before enacting the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu) and the Omnibus Law. Subsequently, the aim is to explore and clarify the conversion of fixed-term work contracts such as PKWT into permanent work contracts such as PKWTT following the implementation of the Perppu. This study adopts a normative/doctrinal approach. The consulted literature encompasses various legal documents, including Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021. Then, it was found that the significance of regulations concerning the PKWT to PKWTT conversion was underscored in offering clarity to workers in their daily tasks. The Manpower Law imposes restrictions on work agreements with employees, mandating written contracts in Indonesian and prohibiting multiple extensions beyond the stipulated limit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":477047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Justisi\",\"volume\":\"119 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Justisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i3.2420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justisi","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i3.2420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
政府取代了关于创造就业机会的 2022 年第 2 号法律,取消了关于就业的 2020 年第 11 号法律中的衍生条款,并引用了法律确定性和保护原则。就业合同条款主要受 2003 年《第 13 号人力法》管辖,2020 年《第 11 号法》中的具体条款保持不变,如将定期工作协议/Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT) 转换为永久工作协议/Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWTT)。与此同时,2021 年第 35 号政府条例已被新实施的条例废除,这给地方法院的法律地位调整带来了挑战。本调查旨在审查和阐明在颁布《政府代替法律条例》(Perppu)和《综合法》之前将 PKWT 转变为 PKWTT 的执行情况。随后,本研究旨在探讨和阐明在《政府代法条例》(Perppu)和《综合法》实施后,将定期工作合同(如 PKWT)转换为长期工作合同(如 PKWTT)的情况。本研究采用规范/理论方法。参考文献包括各种法律文件,其中包括 2021 年第 35 号政府条例。研究发现,有关将 PKWT 转为 PKWTT 的法规在明确工人日常工作方面具有重要意义。人力法》对与员工签订的工作协议做出了限制,规定必须用印尼语签订书面合同,并禁止在规定期限之外多次延期。
Legal Position of Employment Agreement after the Enactment of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perpu) Number 02 of 2022 Concerning Manpower
The government has replaced Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation, eliminating derivative provisions from Law Number 11 of 2020 on Employment and citing the principles of Legal Certainty and Protection. The terms of employment contracts are predominantly governed by Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower, with specific provisions from Law Number 11 of 2020 remaining intact, such as the conversion from Fixed-Term Work Agreements/ Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT) to Permanent Work Agreements/Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWTT). Meanwhile, Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021 has been rescinded by the newly implemented Regulation, posing challenges for legal status adjustments in district courts. This investigation aims to scrutinize and elucidate the execution of converting PKWT to PKWTT before enacting the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu) and the Omnibus Law. Subsequently, the aim is to explore and clarify the conversion of fixed-term work contracts such as PKWT into permanent work contracts such as PKWTT following the implementation of the Perppu. This study adopts a normative/doctrinal approach. The consulted literature encompasses various legal documents, including Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021. Then, it was found that the significance of regulations concerning the PKWT to PKWTT conversion was underscored in offering clarity to workers in their daily tasks. The Manpower Law imposes restrictions on work agreements with employees, mandating written contracts in Indonesian and prohibiting multiple extensions beyond the stipulated limit.